See if you can spot a pattern in the seemingly random set of stopsIt would be the mid 90s just before privatization. I remember using them as a child and going to Luton (and onwards to Brighton) on service called "Intercity Shuttle" calling at Leicester, Kettering, Luton and London St Pancras.
I am interested to see the pattern of calling points and especially how it compares to the twice hourly clock face timetable.
If memory serves me correctly the timetable was tweaked to incorporate the IC Shuttle concept and to maximise the use of the limited IC125's.It would be the mid 90s just before privatization. I remember using them as a child and going to Luton (and onwards to Brighton) on service called "Intercity Shuttle" calling at Leicester, Kettering, Luton and London St Pancras.
I am interested to see the pattern of calling points and especially how it compares to the twice hourly clock face timetable.
Summer 1989If memory serves me correctly the timetable was tweaked to incorporate the IC Shuttle concept and to maximise the use of the limited IC125's.
Off peak it was every 90 minutes to/from:
London to Nottingham with some intermediate stops chiefly Luton and Kettering to Leicester then Loughborough and Nottingham.
London to Sheffield principally fast to Leicester. Some also called Luton or Bedford then fast to Leicester, Derby, Chesterfield and Sheffield.
London to Leicester calling Luton, Bedford, Wellingborough, Kettering and Market Harborough before terminating at Leicester.
The calls at Luton were designed to provide an easy interchange with NSE's Thameslink service to Gatwick and for Luton Airport via the dedicated Luton flyer buslink.
The idea was to provide an even 30 minute service between St. Pancras and Leicester and even 90 minutes to Derby, Nottingham and Sheffield.
EDIT at 2047.
Post 5 describes the situation perfectly whereas my description must be a year or two earlier because MML got extra HST's to boost its services to hourly.
It's bizzare to think of a London Terminal recieving only a half-hourly (or in the case of Sundays, hourly) service now, not least one the size of St. Pancras.
I suppose Eurostar and HS1 really did save it then (perhaps with the help of the Corby reopening), whilst also simultaneously destroying it in some people's view!!Primarily I suppose because fairly uniquely the "local" services were all moved elsewhere, whether in the distant past (trains to the LTS, other suburban services) or more recently with Thameslink going downstairs leaving the main terminal with just a fairly small scale Intercity operation. You can almost see why there was a proposal to shut it.
See if you can spot a pattern in the seemingly random set of stops
Winter 1993-1994
Weekday departures from St Pancras
0700 Sheffield - LUT-WEL-KET-MHR-LEI-DBY-CHD-SHF
0730 Nottingham - BDM-WEL-LEI-NOT
0800 Sheffield - LUT-LEI-LBO-DBY-CHD-SHF
0830 Nottingham - LUT-WEL-KET-LEI-NOT
0900 Sheffield - BDM-MHR-LEI-LBO-DBY-CHD-SHF
0930 Nottingham - BDM-KET-LEI-NOT
1000 Sheffield - LUT-WEL-KET-MHR-LEI-DBY-CHD-SHF
1030 Nottingham - KET-LEI-LBO-NOT
1100 Sheffield - BDM-WEL-KET-MHR-LEI-DBY-CHD-SHF
1130 Nottingham - LUT-LEI-NOT
1200 Sheffield - LUT-KET-LEI-LBO-DBY-CHD-SHF
1230 Nottingham - BDM-WEL-MHR-LEI-NOT
1300 Sheffield - LUT-WEL-KET-LEI-DBY-CHD-SHF
1330 Nottingham - KET-LEI-LBO-NOT
1400 Sheffield - BDM-WEL-KET-MHR-LEI-DBY-CHD-SHF
1430 Nottingham - LUT-LEI-NOT
1500 Leeds - KET-LEI-LBO-DBY-CHD-SHF-DON-WKF-LDS
1530 Nottingham - BDM-WEL-KET-LEI-NOT
1600 Sheffield - LUT-MHR-LEI-LBO-DBY-CHD-SHF
1630 Nottingham - BDM-WEL-KET-MHR-LEI-LBO-NOT
1700 Sheffield - LEI-DBY-CHD-SHF (The Master Cutler)
1715 Nottingham - WEL-KET-MHR-LEI-LBO-NOT (The Robin Hood)
1730 Derby - WEL-KET-LEI-LGE-DBY (Class 47 and coaches, not HST)
1745 Leeds - WEL-KET-MHR-LEI-BEE-NOT-ALF-CHD-SHF-DON-WKF-LDS
1800 Sheffield - LEI-LBO-DBY-CHD-SHF
1820 Nottingham - WEL-KET-MHR-LEI-NOT
1850 Leeds - LUT-KET-MHR-DBY-CHD-SHF-WKF-LDS
1920 Sheffield - BDM-WEL-KET-LEI-BEE-NOT-ALF-CHD-SHF
2000 Sheffield - LUT-WEL-KET-LEI-LBO-DBY-CHD-SHF
2045 Derby - BDM-WEL-KET-MHR-LEI-NOT-DBY
2145 Sheffield - LUT-WEL-KET-LEI-LBO-DBY-CHD-SHF
2315 Derby - BDM-WEL-KET-MHR-LEI-LBO-NOT-DBY (2336 on Fridays with stop at Luton)
Saturdays were 45 minute gaps between departures from St Pancras instead of 30 - ie Nottingham and Sheffield each served every 90 minutes. Sunday close to hourly, ie two-hourly to each destination but some extras, all with seemingly random skip-stopping.
LUT=Luton, BDM=Bedford, WEL=Wellingborough, KET=Kettering, MHR=Market Harborough, LEI=Leicester, LBO=Loughborough, BEE=Beeston, NOT=Nottingham, LGE=Long Eaton, ALF=Alfreton & Mansfield Parkway, DBY=Derby, CHD=Chesterfield, SHF=Sheffield, DON=Doncaster, WKF=Wakefield Westgate, LDS=Leeds
This is why the late 1990s timetable with the Turbostars was revolutionary.
I think Midland Mainline started that recovery by doubling service provision in 1999 as evidenced by the fact that within one year the 170s were inadequate and centre cars were ordered to augment 10 of the sets to 3-car and then not very long after than the order for the 222s was placed.I suppose Eurostar and HS1 really did save it then (perhaps with the help of the Corby reopening), whilst also simultaneously destroying it in some people's view!!
Going off my Summer 1993 timetable the opening notes and symbols section defines InterCity 'Shuttle' trains as having:That really is a dire service.
What was the Shuttle concept by the way?
One IC Shuttle aim was to always have a train to board at the terminus, with doors and buffet open, so no hanging around on the concourse.What was the Shuttle concept by the way?
The later VT 3tph Euston-Birmingham/Manchester services were supposed to offer a similar level of service - I don't know if they did in practice.
It's bizzare to think of a London Terminal recieving only a half-hourly (or in the case of Sundays, hourly) service now, not least one the size of St. Pancras.
Primarily I suppose because fairly uniquely the "local" services were all moved elsewhere, whether in the distant past (trains to the LTS, other suburban services) or more recently with Thameslink going downstairs leaving the main terminal with just a fairly small scale Intercity operation. You can almost see why there was a proposal to shut it.
Good points - we've come a long way since the 1980s - we can obviously put our own "spin" on the reasons for this (depending on your politics) but the frequencies in the 1980s are worth remembering when people complain about how apparently short sighted it was to suggest things like closing Marylebone/ St Pancras - I get frustrated when people moan about how supposedly backward people were back then (whether they blame BR/ Civil Service/ Mrs Thatcher herself for any proposal).
Things were bleak back then - the idea that we'd be arguing about how four trains per hour from London to Leicester would soon be inadequate (and trains of up to ten coaches too) would have seemed rather fanciful.
Similarly, the Sheffield - London service has come down from "just under two and a half hours" to "just over two hours" (still a lot slower than comparable distances on the ECML/ WCML, but a lot faster than it used to be) - the MML has been a real success story of the last generation.
When everything is running OK, they pretty much did at Euston and Piccadilly.
This is true, however one can rather than critique the proposals, critique the attitude towards the railways at the time - it's not as though the demand wasn't there, it just needed some forward thinking and innovation to bring it out, and the MML is a perfect example of this.Good points - we've come a long way since the 1980s - we can obviously put our own "spin" on the reasons for this (depending on your politics) but the frequencies in the 1980s are worth remembering when people complain about how apparently short sighted it was to suggest things like closing Marylebone/ St Pancras - I get frustrated when people moan about how supposedly backward people were back then (whether they blame BR/ Civil Service/ Mrs Thatcher herself for any proposal).
Things were bleak back then - the idea that we'd be arguing about how four trains per hour from London to Leicester would soon be inadequate (and trains of up to ten coaches too) would have seemed rather fanciful.
Similarly, the Sheffield - London service has come down from "just under two and a half hours" to "just over two hours" (still a lot slower than comparable distances on the ECML/ WCML, but a lot faster than it used to be) - the MML has been a real success story of the last generation.
BA's shuttles actually had a guarantee that if a flight was full and a passenger turned up they would put on a relief flight using a stand-by aircraft. Even if there was only one extra passenger! Not sure when BA phased out that guarantee, but Heathrow was slot constrained even in the 1980s so for BA the idea of keeping aircraft on standby and trying to get it out (and it'd have to come back) would have become increasingly problematic. I'd imagine they would need a couple of standby aircraft (plus crews) as well.One IC Shuttle aim was to always have a train to board at the terminus, with doors and buffet open, so no hanging around on the concourse.
Like the one-time aim to "ban paper destination labels on doors", I'm not sure it ever worked quite like that.
BA's "shuttles", on which the BR concept was based didn't work either, in the long run.
I suppose in both cases the resources needed were too wasteful of capacity.
BA's shuttles actually had a guarantee that if a flight was full and a passenger turned up they would put on a relief flight using a stand-by aircraft. Even if there was only one extra passenger!
Good points - we've come a long way since the 1980s - we can obviously put our own "spin" on the reasons for this (depending on your politics) but the frequencies in the 1980s are worth remembering when people complain about how apparently short sighted it was to suggest things like closing Marylebone/ St Pancras - I get frustrated when people moan about how supposedly backward people were back then (whether they blame BR/ Civil Service/ Mrs Thatcher herself for any proposal).
Things were bleak back then - the idea that we'd be arguing about how four trains per hour from London to Leicester would soon be inadequate (and trains of up to ten coaches too) would have seemed rather fanciful.
Similarly, the Sheffield - London service has come down from "just under two and a half hours" to "just over two hours" (still a lot slower than comparable distances on the ECML/ WCML, but a lot faster than it used to be) - the MML has been a real success story of the last generation.
Emphasis here on number of departures per hour, but how many seats are now provided compared to the 1980s, and what are the actual loads.
Certainly there were no 5-car trains running St Pancras to Sheffield, unlike today. Nor a 5-car southbound Sheffield service making all the principal stops, with standees, running just a few minutes ahead of a larger HST from Nottingham, half-empty or more because all its passengers have been scooped by the train ahead. If you asked how many square metres of carriage saloon space were provided, because nowadays the seats have been squeezed up so your knees are up by your ears, an even more telling comparison. And then there's the desire to do an Orcats raid on Thameslink by making extra stops at stations well served by the latter's 12-car trains.