Money - lack of
Money - value for
Quite - probably best if the poster of these questions puts the crayons away now.
Money - lack of
Money - value for
Quite - probably best if the poster of these questions puts the crayons away now.
As this thread has just received a request for a link to it, in another more currently running thread, where Class 230 units are the fulcrum point of discussion, it would be useful to receive any new information, if any, on how the TOC themselves actually regard future operational and technical matters on the Island Line.
I don't think anything new has been made public recently.
I was on the Island last month, and was actually quite pleasantly surprised by the current state of the rolling stock - it seems a bit smarter than it was a couple of years ago, certainly internally at least.
Has unit 007 returned to service yet following its refurb last year?
Has any improvement's been made to the track work of late? On a visit to the island last year, it was becoming quite apparent that the track work south of Ryde St Johns was in dire need of some attention. It's considerably bouncy along that stretch!
Awful track quality. Are they still running at 50mph?
I noted 45mph on my most recent trip last month; the ride quality didn't seem all that atrocious to me.
They could advertise it as the Island's 'Alton Towers' experience ! Awful track quality. Are they still running at 50mph ? If it was a heritage line the ORR would have shut it down by now....
Went on Easter Monday. The roofs on most of the units are in a terrible state. Looks like they're down to 3 operational and 2 languishing in St John's Road depot.
All the talk of reinstating the loop at Brading to allow more trains to run, but they wouldn't have enough to actually do it!
I'm thinking of visiting the line soon, could you advise which units you saw running and which are visible at St Johns? Thanks.
Oh heck, I wasn't paying that close attention. I think 7 and 4 were running, 6 was sitting in the platform at RYR, one with "Raptor" on its name plate was gutted at the depot and one was on the siding behind it.
All the talk of reinstating the loop at Brading to allow more trains to run, but they wouldn't have enough to actually do it!
The idea behind that is to run the service at 30/30 instead of 20/40, so it's the same number of trains, just more evenly spaced.
Personally I think they should do 30/30 in the winter and 20/20/20 between Easter and October. The present 40 minute gap has got to be a deterrent to travel.
Agreed and they might have to lenghten the new units with a summer 20min interval too.The idea behind that is to run the service at 30/30 instead of 20/40, so it's the same number of trains, just more evenly spaced.
Personally I think they should do 30/30 in the winter and 20/20/20 between Easter and October. The present 40 minute gap has got to be a deterrent to travel.
Agreed and they might have to lengthen the new units with a summer 20min interval too.
The 230s have quite a lot of extra capacity compared to the 483s even in 2 car format but yes, I think 3 car would be the way to go.
When I went just before Easter, I had 006 and 008Oh heck, I wasn't paying that close attention. I think 7 and 4 were running, 6 was sitting in the platform at RYR, one with "Raptor" on its name plate was gutted at the depot and one was on the siding behind it.
I think it was a joke (as in getting the trains over).So why is the Solent stopping them from running? I know when there’s a high tide and a heavy swell they knock the service on the head at the Esplanade but that doesn’t happen all that often.
Gauging professional Gareth Dennis has made some interesting comments on twitter: https://twitter.com/GarethDennis/status/1121055592171356161
"...the dynamically modelled Class 230 vehicles "fit" (i.e. can be gauge-cleared) without a problem.... A little cosy here and there, but the only thing stopping them running is the Solent!"
"The tunnel is flatly not an issue. Platform gauging always requires a bit of work, and there are two minor overbridges that get tight enough to warrant a closer look, but not a thing that would worry me, and I have to live and breathe this stuff."
"(and I ran this using data that precedes the recent physical work that "may or may not" have been done to make sure they definitely fit anyway)"
Strap em to a hovercraft. It'll be fineI think it was a joke (as in getting the trains over).
Suggested that maybe 3rd rail charging at termini (small generators) and possibly Brading, as the existing electrical infrastructure is in need of desperate renewal.Sounds like a good solution then. Hopefully though, they would be converted to third rail, rather than diesel.