Not on AHBCs.I was under the impression that train drivers had a white light displayed to them to confirm that the barriers had lowered and the wig-wags were wig-wagging. Is that not the case?
Not on AHBCs.I was under the impression that train drivers had a white light displayed to them to confirm that the barriers had lowered and the wig-wags were wig-wagging. Is that not the case?
It won’t time out with a train within the controls on the approach, only in certain conditions if the train’s at least started to leave the crossing but hasn’t operated the ‘strike out’ sequence correctly (fairly sure that still requires the track circuit on approach clear even if the exit treadle has been operated).It won't 'fail' but they do 'time out' and raise after a while, the lights stay flashing though. See the thread about the car colliding with the failed freight train across an AHB. They're designed to.
So how do train drivers know that the crossing has deployed correctly?Not on AHBCs.
They don't.So how do train drivers know that the crossing has deployed correctly?
So how do train drivers know that the crossing has deployed correctly?
They don't.
Other types of crossings do have DWLs, although I understand they have a flashing red aspect as well, when the crossing hasn't activated.
Thanks. Been years since I've been near an AOCL.The red is flashing at all times & only changes to white once the road warning lights have started flashing correctly but before the barriers are fully lowered.
So how do train drivers know that the crossing has deployed correctly?
I was under the impression that train drivers had a white light displayed to them to confirm that the barriers had lowered and the wig-wags were wig-wagging. Is that not the case?
Sorry, but if the crossing is half barriered then it is NOT locally monitored, and there are NO signal indications for the train driver.
To be fair the "cretin"'s complaint seems to be more about the surprisingly circuitous route she's now been required to take in order to get just a few stops up the line, rather than the accident itself, but I agree that she's been extremely insensitive about the whole thing. A simple rephrasing expressing condolences to all concerned before then complaining about the workaround arrangements might have worked wonders.
I actually think the journalist's behaviour is arguably worse, especially given the age of those involved.
Hmmm, that makes it sound as if I might be defending the complainant's text. I'm really not.
No, why should they, it would be far more common. This is quite unusual.
If he had such a light he could do nothing about it as AHBs only activate after the point that a train could stop.I was under the impression that train drivers had a white light displayed to them to confirm that the barriers had lowered and the wig-wags were wig-wagging. Is that not the case?
I was just going to post to my wife the somewhat odious Kate Jackson's Twitter feed re. this incident - link not now available. Surprised? - no! As a former Level Crossing Manager with Railtrack SW this was not one of mine, so to speak. I would view the situation as generally commented on. The driver of the train in question is the one who can give more substance. Traumatic, to say the least, for him/her.
A commuter has been branded "ignorant and selfish" for complaining about delays after a 15-year-old boy and his granddad were killed when their car was hit by a train.
The car was reportedly engulfed by a fireball as it was shunted along the track in the tiny hamlet of Barns Green near Billingshurst, Sussex.
But people began seething at one commuter online after she complained about having to get a rail replacement bus following the incident.
Kate Jackson was told to "get some perspective" and to "get a grip" following her comments just over an hour after the incident.
She wrote: "Ridiculous from Southern Rail UK.
If you still wish to show your wife, the Mirror have reported it.
https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/delayed-commuter-slammed-complaining-after-12041924
Happened too in the derailment near Ashford a couple of years ago. GSMR failing to work correctly when most needed.
If you still wish to show your wife, the Mirror have reported it.
https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/delayed-commuter-slammed-complaining-after-12041924
It won’t time out with a train within the controls on the approach, only in certain conditions if the train’s at least started to leave the crossing but hasn’t operated the ‘strike out’ sequence correctly (fairly sure that still requires the track circuit on approach clear even if the exit treadle has been operated).
From memory the GSMR MCB was tripped during that derailment. It would (in theory) be possible to use the GSMR set in a non driving cab. Quicker to use the nearest SPT if it’s less than 4 coach lengths away.
Good. She fully deserves to be publicly shamed. Serves her right.
View attachment 42911
Just going to leave this here.
It sure does.And look what she changed her profile image to in the last 30 minutes or so, says a lot.
Erm:
ABCL
Auto (half) Barrier Crossing Locally monitored.
Darandio - many thanks. A lot more there than the twitter feed.If you still wish to show your wife, the Mirror have reported it.
https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/delayed-commuter-slammed-complaining-after-12041924
Many thanks to those that have enlightened me about AHBs. I have to confess that my involvement in level crossings is limited to those with big white gates protected by semaphore signals.
Erm:
ABCL
Auto (half) Barrier Crossing Locally monitored.
The problem with attempting to use another GSMR in another cab X far away comes when you have to answer in court why you didn't lay emergency protection immediately after realising you couldn't contact the signaller. I wouldn't want to walk back to the other end of my HST only to have a train in the opposite direction unknowingly hit my derailed train or wreckage. I digress, apologies.