• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Linespeed querys

Status
Not open for further replies.

ntanswell

Member
Joined
23 Mar 2006
Messages
52
Location
Gloucestershire
Hi,

Does anyone know the linespeed through Nuneaton station on the fast lines, Stafford station on the fast lines and Watford Juction on the fast lines?

Thanks

Nathan
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

westcoaster

Established Member
Joined
4 Dec 2006
Messages
4,231
Location
DTOS A or B
the tittle of the publication mate, business plan 2007, so he believe that means the year as in 2007, nath where is thameslink 2000?
 

yorkie

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Administrator
Joined
6 Jun 2005
Messages
67,750
Location
Yorkshire
http://www.networkrail.co.uk/browse%20documents/BusinessPlan2007/PDF/Route%2018%20WCML.pdf

Page 7 shows rough Line Speeds, though Ive no idea how up to date it is.
.
Nice try, but no.

Basically if the majority of the line is 110 or over it will count the entire thing as "110 to 125" even if there many 'islands' of 70, 80 or 90 mph running which actually severely slow trains down, given that it takes time to accelerate back up to 110+ after each of them. e.g. on the ECML the Newark flat crossing is 100mph and costs trains a few minutes, yet there is no record of that in the business plan documents - they are not a patch on a sectional appendix ;) (understatement).

I like the 0-35 category. All it takes is a short section of 0 and nothing would ever move ;)
 

GeoffM

Member
Joined
21 Jun 2006
Messages
83
Stafford is 110mph both lines, though the Down Fast is 75 down to the DF-P3 turnout before becoming 110mph.

Watford is 75mph both lines.

Nuneaton is 100mph both lines.

Taken from current Sectional Appendices, sections MD101 and NW1001.

Geoff M.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top