LNER Azuma (Class 800/801)

Discussion in 'Traction & Rolling Stock' started by snowball, 28 Sep 2018.

  1. Harbon 1

    Harbon 1 Member

    Messages:
    981
    Joined:
    30 Apr 2011
    Location:
    Burton on Trent
    They're firm, but they're not catastrophic. All stock has its issues; the constant groaning of gangways on Mk3s, or the push up the backside and constant knocking from a worn buckeye on Mk4s, they're heavy bits of kit, its never going to be perfect.

    Never experienced a 385 so can only assume its similar to the braking experience I've had on Hitachi stock, no noisier than any other unit I've been on.

    Since all of my journeys on 800/801s have been in the daytime, and I specifically remember being able to see out of the window quite clearly on every single occasion, obviously that's not true. Did you have the blind down? ;)

    Well again the ones I've sat in I know are no worse than 222s.

    Oh that bit. Size isn't important, it's what you do with it.

    Again, not experienced a 385. Very specific time to be tolerable. My arse can go numb sooner than that on any train.

    They may well be alright on the inside, but there is a lot of corrosion appearing around the doors. How long they'll actually last with other operators remains to be seen.
     
  2. Failed Unit

    Failed Unit Established Member

    Messages:
    7,131
    Joined:
    26 Jan 2009
    Location:
    Central Belt
    I see they didn’t turn it at Lincoln and I have got the pleasure of it today on 1006.
     
  3. Thatcham Xing

    Thatcham Xing Member

    Messages:
    165
    Joined:
    1 Nov 2016
    I ride IET's quite a bit in GWR-land but yesterday found myself on a day trip KingsX to Leeds and back. The up journey was on a 2*5 Azuma and back was on a 91/Mk4.

    To me the Azuma was quieter, smoother (although I was sat above a bogie on the 91), brighter and more spacious.
    Yes, the seats are a bit hard but I'm used to that on GWR and didn't find it uncomfortable.
    Only downside was I never saw a catering trolley on the Azuma (this is a permanent gripe on GWR IET's, especially 2*5's).
     
  4. Failed Unit

    Failed Unit Established Member

    Messages:
    7,131
    Joined:
    26 Jan 2009
    Location:
    Central Belt
    For interest what is your view on the buffet? No catering trolley but you have the option of the buffet or do you prefer the GWR no buffet but a trolley?

    I tend to only use the buffet. Mainly as you never know if / when you will see the trolley on LNER. (Which I understand is getting better)
     
  5. sprinterguy

    sprinterguy Established Member

    Messages:
    10,233
    Joined:
    4 Mar 2010
    Location:
    Macclesfield
    The RMT are evidently not happy with working conditions on the LNER class 800/801 Azuma trains, having issued this statement this morning:
    Many of those issues are concurrent with some of the criticism levelled at the trains on this forum. I've already witnessed the first report of an Azuma worked service that suffered cumulative delay at each station stop due to congestion caused on board by insufficient luggage space. That was at the end of the August bank holiday weekend, less than a month after they'd entered service on the Edinburgh route.
     
  6. 3973EXL

    3973EXL Member

    Messages:
    514
    Joined:
    2 Feb 2017
    5X98 Eastleigh - Acton
    5Q98 Acton - Bounds Green
    800102
     
  7. Failed Unit

    Failed Unit Established Member

    Messages:
    7,131
    Joined:
    26 Jan 2009
    Location:
    Central Belt
    You then get posts like #2413 that thinks us passengers (and train crew) should get into the millennium. Accept the declining standards and adapt.

    but certainly the not really heard positive comments from the train crews and station staff.

    About to go on one. But I think we have seats that are nearby the doors that only look at plastic. Good ones to replace with stacks.

    On the train now. Coach B specifically. 8 viewless seats that could be replaced. All near the doors and the pockets for them. Loading on the Lincoln service ok. See how many are on after Newark. I suspect we won’t fill a 153 but LNER will be happy to get us off the 1030. Got to start somewhere. Gone all all types of Azuma now. Can’t tell the difference as a passenger (interior wise if course less coaches etc)
     
    Last edited: 22 Oct 2019
  8. 387star

    387star Established Member

    Messages:
    5,607
    Joined:
    16 Nov 2009
    I thought these trains were praised for their luggage space or was that just overhead ?

    Sounds like nothing has been learned almost two decades on from the voyager introduction

    I was on a 377 outer car the other day and thought blimey these really aren't bad trains. I guess they seem positively comfortable now compared to some fleets although their luggage space is dire too
     
  9. Failed Unit

    Failed Unit Established Member

    Messages:
    7,131
    Joined:
    26 Jan 2009
    Location:
    Central Belt
    the overhead is the same as any other train. You can fit small bags under the seat such as a laptop bag. But only 2 stacks per coach for larger bags. Not enough when you consider that on London - Edinburgh service’s they used to use the DVT / Power car. The more seats per coach is actually making this worse.

    apparently they have other space similar to the bike storage. But it is a lot less than the trains they replace. It is noticeable even in London - Leeds services that getting on mid route the space is all taken.
     
  10. GrimShady

    GrimShady Established Member

    Messages:
    1,438
    Joined:
    13 Dec 2016
    Last time I was on a 800 heading North passengers were being instructed to place unreasonably large items in the overhead racks....which surprise, surprise fell off going round corners.

    One particular journey springs to mind was when the unit arrived in Edinburgh heading south, upon boarding I heard comments from many such as "This can't be the LNER train", "This wasn't pictured on the website" , "Are you sure this is First Class?"

    Voyagers seem plush compared to these things!
     
  11. ainsworth74

    ainsworth74 Moderator Staff Member Moderator

    Messages:
    20,757
    Joined:
    16 Nov 2009
    Location:
    Redcar
    They're a heck of a lot larger than on a lot of other trains! I definitely think the overhead racks are a big plus point to these but...

    And they're only narrow as well. You put one large suitcase in the bottom and that's basically the bottom part filled. Couple of smaller ones in the top and that's full. So maybe three suitcases total which is woeful. I fully agree that all the viewless seats would be much better used for luggage racks and I have to say that they could do with being slightly larger (it feels like they don't take up as much room as the pair of airline seats does). Of course in an ideal world the DfT would have specified a small van space on at least the 9-car trains...
     
  12. Failed Unit

    Failed Unit Established Member

    Messages:
    7,131
    Joined:
    26 Jan 2009
    Location:
    Central Belt
    Depends what you compare it to. I think the overheads are similar to what they replace. HST and Mk4. But compared to a southern electro star they are enormous. The southern electro stars can’t get much on them. Which is odd as the turbos can. (Again similar to the azuma)
     
  13. sprinterguy

    sprinterguy Established Member

    Messages:
    10,233
    Joined:
    4 Mar 2010
    Location:
    Macclesfield
    Indeed, luggage racks in place of the windowless seats at the carriage ends would seem logical, and potentially quite straightforward to retrofit. It also surely shouldn't have been beyond the wit of man at the design stage to include a non-seated area for luggage on these long distance inter-city trains, as per the area behind the cab at the standard class end of a class 397, which I believe is the bike space on those units.
     
  14. td97

    td97 Member

    Messages:
    579
    Joined:
    26 Jul 2017
    The overheads can fit full sized suitcases. The catch is you need to be tall/strong enough to get them there in the first place.
     

    Attached Files:

  15. Thatcham Xing

    Thatcham Xing Member

    Messages:
    165
    Joined:
    1 Nov 2016
    On longer journeys (like yesterday) I'm usually on my own and travelling for business in a reserved seat. So a buffet is of little use.

    Trolley would be great if they turned-up.

    Having said all that, I do miss the chance to stand and have a beer in the buffet of an HST on a late train out of Paddington :)
     
  16. Failed Unit

    Failed Unit Established Member

    Messages:
    7,131
    Joined:
    26 Jan 2009
    Location:
    Central Belt
    Trolley was locked up in buffet today. They did check tickets for a change. Didn’t see many walking to buffet.
     
  17. Y Ddraig Coch

    Y Ddraig Coch Member

    Messages:
    728
    Joined:
    1 Nov 2013
    Seems the RMT are taking all the issues very seriously.

    https://www.rmt.org.uk/news/members...NsGUuhZlkHQzEy4Mp5Teef3uIw9jkomUeqfYsgwq0e8-c

     
  18. 43096

    43096 Established Member

    Messages:
    5,576
    Joined:
    23 Nov 2015
    It would help if people didn’t take so much luggage with them without thinking that their nice four-wheeled case does actually have to be moved and lifted sometimes. Simple rule: don’t take more than you can carry.
     
  19. Y Ddraig Coch

    Y Ddraig Coch Member

    Messages:
    728
    Joined:
    1 Nov 2013
    Bring back guards vans on long distance services....
     
  20. EE Andy b1

    EE Andy b1 Established Member

    Messages:
    1,115
    Joined:
    12 Dec 2013
    Location:
    CLC
    Just think of the delays at stations with a guards van with the intense service we have nowadays.
     
  21. Marton

    Marton Member

    Messages:
    520
    Joined:
    9 Nov 2008
    I’m always worried when I see the size and weight of some cases in overheads. If there were an incident it’s a lot of head injury material.

    When there were more paired facing seats there was more luggage space between the pairs. Far safer.
     
  22. Failed Unit

    Failed Unit Established Member

    Messages:
    7,131
    Joined:
    26 Jan 2009
    Location:
    Central Belt
    Not really noticed it on the Mk4s now. The HST is worse as we don’t have a door near where the baggage is stored.
     
  23. EE Andy b1

    EE Andy b1 Established Member

    Messages:
    1,115
    Joined:
    12 Dec 2013
    Location:
    CLC
    From what i have seen, nobody unless it's out size baggage like a Cello or such like ever goes and dumps there large cases in the DVT as they all want it near them, and most people would not know there was a luggage van on Mk4, HSTs or anything else.
    You would have passengers wondering up and down the platform looking for the guards van, dumping cases then walking up and down the platform looking for coach A, B, Z whatever, with time ebbing away.

    It might have worked if all train types were basically the same with guards van in a similar position on most Intercity trains.

    The best bet would be to remove seats in the middle of each vehicle for large floor to ceiling racks for large cases where they can be watched and secured.
     
  24. Failed Unit

    Failed Unit Established Member

    Messages:
    7,131
    Joined:
    26 Jan 2009
    Location:
    Central Belt
    In the summer / Christmas period it is encouraged for London - Edinburgh passengers. They are directed to the DVT and it frees up the stacks for people travelling at the intermediate stations.

    you get baggage tags and everything.

    did GWR have issues in their Cornish services in the holidays?
     
  25. EE Andy b1

    EE Andy b1 Established Member

    Messages:
    1,115
    Joined:
    12 Dec 2013
    Location:
    CLC
    I personally don't know this year about GWR as have not travelled with them due to the discomfort of there IETs but i would have thought they would have had problems as there the same type of train ordered by the the same DfT with the same shortage of large case racks, maybe not to the same amount as the Scottish trains as these are very popular on both East and West Coast mainlines.

    A few weeks back i was on the 1006 Kings Cross to Newark which was formed of 2 x Class 801s, which got terminated at Peterborough due to a train fault, so we were all de-trained and got on the following 1030 ex Kings Cross to Edinburgh, Class 91 & Mk4s which ended up full and standing. You could hardly move for cases and baggage, it was that bad the guard had made several announcements of people to move cases from vestibules and doors. That was probably at the extreme due to failure.
     
  26. Goldfish62

    Goldfish62 Established Member

    Messages:
    3,325
    Joined:
    14 Feb 2010
    Indeed, the Lazzerrini high back seats that First currently specify are comfortable, despite (or because of?) being quite an old design and are certainly far more comfortable than anything the (UK) railways are able to provide.
     
  27. td97

    td97 Member

    Messages:
    579
    Joined:
    26 Jul 2017
    It has a use at term end dates for the universities along the ECML, for example see https://twitter.com/PeterSharp76/status/1109409359602294784?s=20
    The only way that will be possible soon is if a small batch of Mk4s is retained.
     
  28. Bletchleyite

    Bletchleyite Veteran Member

    Messages:
    43,401
    Joined:
    20 Oct 2014
    Location:
    Up and down the south WCML (mostly)
    Interestingly this is exactly what Virgin did on the Mk2 LHCS on XC - removed one bay at the coach middle and replaced with a large luggage rack. The trouble with having it in the middle is that there are flow conflicts - people board, head to the middle to drop bags, then move back outwards to find seats against the flow of those still boarding. This slows boarding progress.

    As such it's better, in an end-doored coach, to have such a rack at the ends but inside the vestibule doors so people can still see it and watch it.
     
  29. ashkeba

    ashkeba Member

    Messages:
    601
    Joined:
    13 May 2019
    I donot understand this. Is there a discount business reserved ticket that prohibits leaving your seat to visit the buffet?

    Yes, a demi of Arkells stood at the window as the scenery changed from London to Thames Valley was an enjoyable experience on the old GWR. An experience lost for now, like restaurant cars on Stomarket-London intercities. A curse on railway companies for not cherishing and promoting these treasures!
     
  30. EE Andy b1

    EE Andy b1 Established Member

    Messages:
    1,115
    Joined:
    12 Dec 2013
    Location:
    CLC
    Well i didn't realise that LNER used the DVT for such a use nowadays until @Failed Unit mentioned it above. So LNER knowing the amount of cases that could be carried still had the interior fit on the Azuma unfit for purpose with the lack of large case luggage racks.
    I wonder if Mr Sharp will be there in the future when the Mk4s have all gone.
     

Share This Page