• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

LNER remove 'small number of services' from timetables

Status
Not open for further replies.

ainsworth74

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
16 Nov 2009
Messages
27,671
Location
Redcar
Ok if they have a stock shortage but the last time I checked there is some suitable stock stored at Ely in the form of ex FGW HSTs why not make use of these in the interim.

Different interior (seat reservation headache), different interior fixtures and fittings (maintenance issues and crew familiarisation required) and different kitchen equipment (crew training required plus complicates delivery of catering) off the top of my head. Plus are the vehicles there actually spare (i.e. not waiting for work at Wabtec) and if so are there enough vehicles of the right type to form a full 2+9 set?
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

hwl

Established Member
Joined
5 Feb 2012
Messages
7,398
Plus are the vehicles there actually spare (i.e. not waiting for work at Wabtec) and if so are there enough vehicles of the right type to form a full 2+9 set?
Not really and No unless you want a mix of mainly buffet with little bit of First... and then there is the lack of power cars.
 

ainsworth74

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
16 Nov 2009
Messages
27,671
Location
Redcar
https://twitter.com/Clinnick1/media - Don't know if you can make out what the coaches are in that picture. Definitely attached to one power car though and I would be surprised if there wasn't one at the other end (out of shot).

Looks like a TF and a TGS. So! Only seven more vehicles and one more power car to go! Then we just have to overcome the other issues! :lol:
 

hwl

Established Member
Joined
5 Feb 2012
Messages
7,398
Looks like a TF and a TGS. So! Only seven more vehicles and one more power car to go! Then we just have to overcome the other issues! :lol:
See the HST withdrawal/ Scotland thread. They typically go to Ely complete as is and are initially next to the railway line where the the coaches are shunted around by the power cars to separate the surplus off lease coaches (ending up on the sidings furthest from the line) and then form a train to wabtec with the next set of coaches and power cars for mods. With OOC effectively gone there isn't much space on the GW to sort and store stuff before it leaves hence the new solution.

It looks like that could be a train soon to depart for Wabtec given a TGS and a TF
 

Chrism20

Established Member
Joined
27 Feb 2013
Messages
1,347
At those times Stirling was always going to be marginal although I’m sure when it was discussed on here at the launch it was said the early start was to provide an arrival into London before midday.

Northbound I think there would probably have been more usage had it been the 1700 or the 1730 rather than the 1500.although as others have said it gets terminated at Edinburgh at the first sign of problems on the line.
 

158756

Established Member
Joined
12 Aug 2014
Messages
1,447
Whilst this sort of change is never a good thing and has hopefully been subject to robust scrutiny both within LNER and also at the DfT it probably is better for passengers that steps are taken to run a reliable service by cutting a small number of services. That being said removing the 1745 from Leeds seems a brave move!

One of their tweets says they're cutting services fewer people book. So if the 1745 from Leeds is full of commuters they don't seem to figure in LNER's thinking - there are Pacers they can use instead. I doubt the same would be applied to commuters at the London end of the route though.
 

Andyh82

Established Member
Joined
19 May 2014
Messages
3,536
Disgraceful, bring back Virgin, It’s about time the railways were reprivatised! :lol:
 

northernchris

Established Member
Joined
24 Jul 2011
Messages
1,509
So a nationalised operator really isn't the answer to all the problems! On a serious note though, did Virgin add services to try to meet their repayments but ended up overstretching the fleet in the process? It's no secret LNER's performance has been dire and cannot be allowed to continue at those levels so hopefully these changes will see its performance creep back up.

The 1745 ex Leeds is a strange one to axe, that could push Wakefield commuters on to the already busy 1748 Sheffield service, and with the 1757 Doncaster being a regular contender for being cancelled due to the current EMU shortage it could be a bumpy few months for those travelling to Wakefield and Doncaster from Leeds
 

Helvellyn

Established Member
Joined
28 Aug 2009
Messages
2,013
Don't forget the regular spot hire of an EMT set between the peaks. Maybe EMT have said no more (it was previously one Stagecoach company helping out another) so LNER have decided to re-diagram trainsets to give itself an extra operational spare?
 

Johnny Lewis

Member
Joined
9 Jan 2011
Messages
334
Location
York
Irritatingly, I'm booked on one of the cancelled services next Friday - the 15.03 from King's Cross. I had an email from LNER but struggled initially to find the information on their website.

Knowing how busy LNER trains get on Friday afternoons, I'm now in a quandary to decide which train to catch instead. The train half an hour later will presumably be very busy with all the poor unfortunates who haven't been told that the 15.03 is cancelled!

Any thoughts or suggestions?
 

158756

Established Member
Joined
12 Aug 2014
Messages
1,447
I also don't see how axing Stirling is going to improve reliability much. Unless of course they don't have the staff. Just looks like straightforward cost cutting to me.
 

Marton

Member
Joined
9 Nov 2008
Messages
664
I also don't see how axing Stirling is going to improve reliability much. Unless of course they don't have the staff. Just looks like straightforward cost cutting to me.
Isn’t the problem that it has to be an HST. If there’s disruption substitution doesn’t work.
 

43094

Member
Joined
19 May 2010
Messages
893
Cutting the Stirling services gives an additional 2 hours each side of the night, to help give sufficient time for the maintenance of HST sets at Craigentinny (main HST depot).

These Leeds services are the ones which are followed (KGX - DON & return) by the York stoppers. So anyone for stations Doncaster or South of there is inconvenienced less than any other cancellation options would be.

Cancelling those four MK4 sets removes one full diagram per day.
 

Esker-pades

Established Member
Joined
23 Jul 2015
Messages
3,766
Location
Beds, Bucks, or somewhere else
Irritatingly, I'm booked on one of the cancelled services next Friday - the 15.03 from King's Cross. I had an email from LNER but struggled initially to find the information on their website.

Knowing how busy LNER trains get on Friday afternoons, I'm now in a quandary to decide which train to catch instead. The train half an hour later will presumably be very busy with all the poor unfortunates who haven't been told that the 15.03 is cancelled!

Any thoughts or suggestions?

I'd try and go for the one that is 30 minutes earlier. Can't guarantee anything though.
 

xotGD

Established Member
Joined
4 Feb 2017
Messages
6,087
Cutting the Stirling services gives an additional 2 hours each side of the night, to help give sufficient time for the maintenance of HST sets at Craigentinny (main HST depot).

These Leeds services are the ones which are followed (KGX - DON & return) by the York stoppers. So anyone for stations Doncaster or South of there is inconvenienced less than any other cancellation options would be.

Cancelling those four MK4 sets removes one full diagram per day.
Presumably cancelling the Mark 4 diagram is due to a lack of sets of stock rather than locos. They could always hire in another 90 if needed.
 

Hadders

Veteran Member
Associate Staff
Senior Fares Advisor
Joined
27 Apr 2011
Messages
13,189
This may not be stock related. It could be LNER’s way of dealing with driver/guard/crew shortages.

Either way it’s probably more cost effective to just cancel the service so they can return more money to the treasury.
 

43094

Member
Joined
19 May 2010
Messages
893
It's stock related - both sets and locos.

There's already 3x90 on hire at the moment, either one or two of which are used each day - the difficulty is the relevant Driver knowledge (and 110MPH top speed), which means hiring another one to use in service isn't really feasible.
 

cactustwirly

Established Member
Joined
10 Apr 2013
Messages
7,455
Location
UK
It's stock related - both sets and locos.

There's already 3x90 on hire at the moment, either one or two of which are used each day - the difficulty is the relevant Driver knowledge (and 110MPH top speed), which means hiring another one to use in service isn't really feasible.

How come the 91 availability is so bad?
I don't recall East Coast having these issues with them
 

ainsworth74

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
16 Nov 2009
Messages
27,671
Location
Redcar
How come the 91 availability is so bad?
I don't recall East Coast having these issues with them

East Coast weren't working them as hard as the current timetable requires as has been mentioned elsewhere the fleet is being worked harder than ever before which increases the strain on the vehicles at the same time as it reduces the time available to actually keep them functional. They're also that bit older and that bit further from the heavy work they had done to them in the early 00s to improve reliability.
 

hwl

Established Member
Joined
5 Feb 2012
Messages
7,398
East Coast weren't working them as hard as the current timetable requires as has been mentioned elsewhere the fleet is being worked harder than ever before which increases the strain on the vehicles at the same time as it reduces the time available to actually keep them functional. They're also that bit older and that bit further from the heavy work they had done to them in the early 00s to improve reliability.
There was also some bad snow damage to the electric on 1 loco that was meant to put it out of action for months?
 

matacaster

On Moderation
Joined
19 Jan 2013
Messages
1,603
Quoted from LNER Leeds and Stirling Services Timetables changes today

"If you’re booked to travel on one of the affected trains, please travel on an earlier or later LNER train on the same day - your ticket will of course be valid."

My wife and I are booked on 11.58 from Wakefield to LKX on 15th September 2018, which I think is the 11.45 from Leeds.

Does this mean we can catch a peak time train despite the fact that we've currently got cheapest advance tickets going (but will likely try to upgrade to weekend first)?
 

_toommm_

Established Member
Joined
8 Jul 2017
Messages
5,855
Location
Yorkshire
Quoted from LNER Leeds and Stirling Services Timetables changes today

"If you’re booked to travel on one of the affected trains, please travel on an earlier or later LNER train on the same day - your ticket will of course be valid."

My wife and I are booked on 11.58 from Wakefield to LKX on 15th September 2018, which I think is the 11.45 from Leeds.

Does this mean we can catch a peak time train despite the fact that we've currently got cheapest advance tickets going (but will likely try to upgrade to weekend first)?

Normally in those circumstances it's one train either side i.e. 11:15 or 12:15 from Leeds, though no harm can come from tweeting LNER and seeing if you can travel at a different time!
 

ainsworth74

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
16 Nov 2009
Messages
27,671
Location
Redcar
Does this mean we can catch a peak time train despite the fact that we've currently got cheapest advance tickets going (but will likely try to upgrade to weekend first)?

Whilst it doesn't explicitly say I'd be wary trying to go for anything other than the service before or after and certainly not one several hours removed from the booked service.
 

matacaster

On Moderation
Joined
19 Jan 2013
Messages
1,603
Whilst it doesn't explicitly say I'd be wary trying to go for anything other than the service before or after and certainly not one several hours removed from the booked service.

Thanks, duly noted. Thought it was too good to be true!
 

Martin66

Member
Joined
3 Mar 2016
Messages
105
Location
Newcastle upon Tyne
Whilst it doesn't explicitly say I'd be wary trying to go for anything other than the service before or after and certainly not one several hours removed from the booked service.
Thanks, duly noted. Thought it was too good to be true!
The LNER website says: https://www.lner.co.uk/travel-information/leeds-timetable-changes/
If you’re booked to travel on one of the affected trains, please travel on an earlier or later LNER train on the same day - your ticket will of course be valid.
It would appear there are no time restrictions as long as you travel on the same day.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top