I will let you work that one outI'm not certain whether you don't understand, or simply choose not to?
I will let you work that one outI'm not certain whether you don't understand, or simply choose not to?
Have they not now "invested " it. ?Lothian are "INVESTING" in excess £6 million, the Lothian press release doesn't state "LOST" £6 million - that gem you've added yourself...…
6 million invested and its costing a small fortune over the 9 months as buses are not even close to covering their costs .As for imagining up to £10 million losses now...… *Face Palm*. It costs approx. £100k a year to run a bus with nil
6 million invested and its costing a small fortune over the 9 months as buses are not even close to covering their costs .
Not sure I said they have lost 10 million but as a ballpark figure for what they have spent setting this up and operating costs it wont be far short ,wonder how much income they have taken against expenditure ?
It actually costs £120,000 per year
Have they not now "invested " it. ?
You really think they have set all this up for nothing and still have this to "invest" ?
You really think they are covering their weekly running costs with the amount they are lifting?
Buses running around at 10% capacity cannot cover their costs.
Thinking about LCB, are there other examples of such a bold competitive move since deregulation? Can think of plenty of occasions of individual routes being introduced, but a whole network, including brand new coaches? If it has happened, did it succeed?
but the whole Lothian ‘group’ is profitable
I will let you work that one out
6 million invested and its costing a small fortune over the 9 months as buses are not even close to covering their costs .
Not sure I said they have lost 10 million but as a ballpark figure for what they have spent setting this up and operating costs it wont be far short ,wonder how much income they have taken against expenditure ?
It actually costs £120,000 per year
Thinking about LCB, are there other examples of such a bold competitive move since deregulation? Can think of plenty of occasions of individual routes being introduced, but a whole network, including brand new coaches? If it has happened, did it succeed?
Re: Lothian’s investment in West Lothian. It might not seem ‘fair’ that Lothian appears to have a bottomless pit of money at the moment (and I’m including the huge investment in the city operations and on new fleet in East Lothian), but the whole Lothian ‘group’ is profitable and is blessed with one of the most benign bus markets in the UK. Not only can they afford to invest, they'll have no trouble finding institutions willing to lend. I've always doubted that there is much money to be made in West Lothian, but Lothian obviously see opportunities for growth - probably based around Edinburgh's long-term expansion towards the west.
The buses used at Balfron for schools are generally used on the normal services as well so aren't in the end of life category. Depending on the utilisation there may not be a direct correlation between reduction in school contracts and surplus vehicles.No one has confirmed where the extra buses for West Lothian are coming from, just that Balfron/Larbet have 12 surplus to requirement soon, but mostly likely near they'll be end of life ex schools buses.
The buses used at Balfron for schools are generally used on the normal services as well so aren't in the end of life category. Depending on the utilisation there may not be a direct correlation between reduction in school contracts and surplus vehicles.
The buses used at Balfron for schools are generally used on the normal services as well so aren't in the end of life category. Depending on the utilisation there may not be a direct correlation between reduction in school contracts and surplus vehicles.
Mostly 14 year old deckers, so they're approaching end of life.
At this point it will only be around 7 vehicles.I guess the question is whether such vehicles would move directly to Livingston or if they were to move elsewhere in order to allow something newer to move? Even at 14 years of age, they will still have c.3 years of depreciation having to be accounted for, but we're getting a little ahead of ourselves.
Need to understand how many additional vehicles will be required, and then see what they might be.
600 Service being extended to take in Whitburn ,Blackburn Seafield and into Edinburgh Airport from May.
Obviously to go in competition with 275 service offering a quicker service to Livingston ,Broxburn and also going into Airport.
It wont replace the 22 I dont think ,more compliment it and add numbers.They have no confa
Horsburgh did this before and it was pointless.. Mind you there should make it every 30mins and replace the 22..
They have no confa
It wont replace the 22 I dont think ,more compliment it and add numbers.
As I said in another post First aim to have a 5 minute service to centre from all the main areas around West Lothian
That similar to covfefe???
No it wont be renumbered, another 2 ADL vehicles being repainted in the 600 graphics .Will renumber 600 to 22 and bobs your uncle, 600 really NEEDs to be every 30mins..
So what on earth is Javis going to say a week today then?
First's expansion in Edinburgh in 2000 / 2001 is worth a mention. Whilst some routes such as the 66 (renumbered to match Lothian's 44) and 86 were already established they made a very aggressive move to copy Lothian's 11 and 22 services. I am sure there was another route they also went after but would need to check.Thinking about LCB, are there other examples of such a bold competitive move since deregulation? Can think of plenty of occasions of individual routes being introduced, but a whole network, including brand new coaches? If it has happened, did it succeed?
Re: Lothian’s investment in West Lothian. It might not seem ‘fair’ that Lothian appears to have a bottomless pit of money at the moment (and I’m including the huge investment in the city operations and on new fleet in East Lothian), but the whole Lothian ‘group’ is profitable and is blessed with one of the most benign bus markets in the UK. Not only can they afford to invest, they'll have no trouble finding institutions willing to lend. I've always doubted that there is much money to be made in West Lothian, but Lothian obviously see opportunities for growth - probably based around Edinburgh's long-term expansion towards the west.
Yes, I recall the 23 as well. Didn't think the 86 matched an existing LRT number or single route. Wasn't it like half of the 3 and half of the 26? Or was the limited stop LRT 86 still running between Eastfield and Clermiston at that time? First ran a 129 from Silverknowes to Princes St, then out to Seton Sands, but again not an identical route or number copy.First's expansion in Edinburgh in 2000 / 2001 is worth a mention. Whilst some routes such as the 66 (renumbered to match Lothian's 44) and 86 were already established they made a very aggressive move to copy Lothian's 11 and 22 services. I am sure there was another route they also went after but would need to check.
Edit. They also copied the Lothian service 23.
You are correct about the 86. It was established in the late 80's and was a cross between the Lothian 26 (or 86 which Lothian also had at the time and which I believe is why First chose the 86 number) and the Lothian 3, albeit a slightly different route.Yes, I recall the 23 as well. Didn't think the 86 matched an existing LRT number or single route. Wasn't it like half of the 3 and half of the 26? Or was the limited stop LRT 86 still running between Eastfield and Clermiston at that time? First ran a 129 from Silverknowes to Princes St, then out to Seton Sands, but again not an identical route or number copy.
If I remember correctly the 86 ran from Birkenside to St Andrew Square it was then extended to Haymarket or Charlotte Square and then when the competition heated up was further extended to Clermiston. Not sure if it went to Clerwood but I don't think soYou are correct about the 86. It was established in the late 80's and was a cross between the Lothian 26 (or 86 which Lothian also had at the time and which I believe is why First chose the 86 number) and the Lothian 3, albeit a slightly different route.