Man stabbed on Guildford to London train near Horsley

Discussion in 'UK Railway Discussion' started by Starmill, 4 Jan 2019.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Stigy

    Stigy Established Member

    Messages:
    2,651
    Joined:
    6 Nov 2009
    And you’d be quite within your rights to use the shotgun on a knifeman....as long as he’s not got his back to you...
     
  2. bunnahabhain

    bunnahabhain Established Member

    Messages:
    1,730
    Joined:
    8 Jun 2005
    You run away if somebody has a knife, you don't stand and fight, it isn't an even match.
     
  3. A Challenge

    A Challenge Established Member

    Messages:
    2,055
    Joined:
    24 Sep 2016
    If you have a shotgun, as this started you may have more of a chance than him! This probably should become a new thread though!
     
  4. Stigy

    Stigy Established Member

    Messages:
    2,651
    Joined:
    6 Nov 2009
    It’s slightly different when appealing for witnesses to incidents. The police/media can share the images in these cases. I think they still can post sentencing, but what would be the point anyway?
     
  5. Busaholic

    Busaholic Established Member

    Messages:
    7,992
    Joined:
    7 Jun 2014
    There'd have been absolutely no problem with police releasing CCTV, or other film/video, footage of the 'suspect' as long as he wasn't described as the murderer on the accompanying voiceover. There is a form of words that's often used e.g. 'the police are extremely anxious to speak to this person' which we all know is euphemistic, but that's the age we live in. Sometimes (but not in this case, obviously) they add 'to eliminate them from our enquiries' which is many cases patently NOT the case!
     
  6. Tio Terry

    Tio Terry Member

    Messages:
    701
    Joined:
    2 May 2014
    Location:
    Epsom
    I would never runaway from protecting my family to my best abilities.
     
  7. Mathew S

    Mathew S Established Member

    Messages:
    1,488
    Joined:
    7 Aug 2017
    Yes, if police ask the media to share something as part of an appeal (eg. to locate a dangerous suspect) that's grand. And it's generally okay to name someone once they've been charged with an offence, doesn't (usually) have to wait until conviction/sentencing.
    Only if there is a legitimate policing purpose behind releasing the image, otherwise it's still incompatible with Article 8 (right to a private and family life).
     
    Last edited: 6 Jan 2019
  8. tiptoptaff

    tiptoptaff Established Member

    Messages:
    1,687
    Joined:
    15 Feb 2013
    For clarity to other posters, this is the point at which it becomes a matter of public record, Crown Court cases are open to the public and it's deemed in the public interest to be able to name defendants in a trial. Until that point, it is not in the public interest to name suspects. The reason being is that if a defendant is named during the investigation phase and plastered over the media as a murderer (in this example) it will invietably influence any potential juror's opinion of them and can get the rial thrown out, or lead to the CPS dropping the case as they know that the defending barrister will have a reasonable chance of getting it dismissed on that basis. I'm sure Matthew S will correct me, but this is why the press releases and bulletins follow the pattern of a "25year old man has been arrested in connection with X" and nothing further until "A 25year old man has been charged with X. Joe Bloggs, 25, was arrested last week...." or similar.

    This is why Article 8 is so important, even in these cases. As soon as the media names you as something, true or not, it'll stick. And they won't remove web pages that have done so. If I was arrested for murder, and despite being innocent I was named in the press as a the suspect/murderer, it'd be there forever. If anyone ever googled "TipTopTaff" they'd find online news stories saying "TTT arrested for murder" forever and ever, especially as they never normally make a big thing about being released without charge.
     
  9. Statto

    Statto Established Member

    Messages:
    1,872
    Joined:
    8 Feb 2011
    Location:
    At home or at the pub
    That doesn't stop the written media though, look at the recent Drone over Gatwick Airport, the couple who got arrested, then got there names plastered all over the media, turns out they were completely innocent, but not before the vitriol they got in the media who assumed they were guilty as charged.
     
  10. A Challenge

    A Challenge Established Member

    Messages:
    2,055
    Joined:
    24 Sep 2016
    They weren't ever even charged (which is when the media is allowed to name them!)
     
  11. tiptoptaff

    tiptoptaff Established Member

    Messages:
    1,687
    Joined:
    15 Feb 2013
    Yes, indeed, leaked by "friends" apparently. And I am sure there will be consequences. Just because they did it doesn't mean they're allowed.
     
  12. Jack15001

    Jack15001 Member

    Messages:
    202
    Joined:
    26 Nov 2018
    Police have been granted more time to question the suspects.
     
  13. Deepgreen

    Deepgreen Established Member

    Messages:
    4,163
    Joined:
    12 Jun 2013
    Location:
    Betchworth, Surrey
    Don't agree that 'LowLevel' appeared blase - "horrible and shocking" was the phrase used. Accidents and serious assaults will always happen, and society has to carry on (ideally, while learning lessons). If an army is needed on "these trains" (i.e. Surrey commuter) what is needed on, say, inner city streets, buses, etc? It obviously cannot, and will not, be done. If someone is intent on, or prepared to commit, crime, it will happen anywhere. The fact that the suspect was carrying a blade (or managed to obtain a stabbing implement from somewhere on the train) points to a willingness to use it at some point.
     
  14. Mathew S

    Mathew S Established Member

    Messages:
    1,488
    Joined:
    7 Aug 2017
    Absolutely correct. Worth also saying that if you publish something which the court views as having been likely to influence the outcome of the trial - whether intentionally or not - you can be found in contempt for which the maximum penalty is two years imprisonment.
    It *should* stop the written media. If I were the lawyer for any of the papers who published the names I would be heartily wishing I had a different job right now.
     
  15. londonbridge

    londonbridge Member

    Messages:
    791
    Joined:
    30 Jun 2010
    You may have seen video of an incident at a Tesco store in which other shoppers were trying to prevent a couple of shoplifters from escaping in a car. On another forum which I frequent, someone who claims to have been one of the other shoppers involved has posted their version of what happened, this person could potentially be in trouble.
     
  16. Mathew S

    Mathew S Established Member

    Messages:
    1,488
    Joined:
    7 Aug 2017
    I'm not familiar with the details of the incident but, as a general point, yes it's always safest to avoid any kind of comment on a live case.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: 7 Jan 2019
  17. jon0844

    jon0844 Veteran Member

    Messages:
    23,899
    Joined:
    1 Feb 2009
    Location:
    UK
    I saw that (Digital Spy) and the poster does appear to have been told off by quite a few people. It was interesting to find out exactly what happened before the filming, which was more or less what I imagined.. Clearly once someone had been seriously injured, it prompted the action filmed to try and stop the vehicle leaving - rather than members of the public just going mad over someone having stolen a few beers (or whatever) from the store.
     
  18. Dr_Paul

    Dr_Paul Member

    Messages:
    610
    Joined:
    3 Sep 2013
    When I worked in a warehouse in Shepherds Bush some 30 years back, I used to take in my kitchen knives, one of which had a 10" blade, to sharpen on the grinding wheel we had there when they became a bit blunt (it put a superb edge on them). Although this was long before knife-crime became common and although I used to wrap them securely in thick cardboard with parcel-tape and put them in a bag, I used to wonder what might happen were I to get randomly searched en route on the bus, train or underground -- 'Hello, hello, hello, what all this then?'
     
  19. Elecman

    Elecman Established Member

    Messages:
    1,782
    Joined:
    31 Dec 2013
    Location:
    Lancashire
    I have a 3ft Machete in the back of my vehicle that I regularly use to hack down overgrowth on public highways when accessing DNO cubicles for work. Only had the Police called to me once:D:D
     
  20. Robsignals

    Robsignals On Moderation

    Messages:
    424
    Joined:
    3 Aug 2012
    Sympathys to the family. An arrest made so quickly suggests police immediately had a suspect in mind, needing extra time that there's a lack of forensic evidence. In general it's tragic that the police know of people that are likely to kill one day but can't do anything until someone is attacked.
     
  21. Stigy

    Stigy Established Member

    Messages:
    2,651
    Joined:
    6 Nov 2009
    Nothing would happen. If the knives are safely wrapped or packaged and it’s not believed you intended to use them for committing an offence, you’d have no issues. It’s clearly different to having a knife tucked down your trousers or a baseball bat on your oassger seat whilst driving down the road.
     
  22. Jack15001

    Jack15001 Member

    Messages:
    202
    Joined:
    26 Nov 2018
    Needing extra time could be for any number of reasons, you seem to be making a lot of assumptions.
     
  23. A Challenge

    A Challenge Established Member

    Messages:
    2,055
    Joined:
    24 Sep 2016
    My cousin commutes into Central London to work as a chef and is generally travelling home on one of the last trains, and although it is less often now he sometimes has to take all of his knives with him. I believe he has a locked case he keeps them in.
     
  24. 70014IronDuke

    70014IronDuke Established Member

    Messages:
    2,347
    Joined:
    13 Jun 2015
    But we don't, do we? It's comforting, I agree, but we only know that the suspected culprit isn't on the loose (or at least at the time you posted this, in case anything has moved on since).
     
  25. Busaholic

    Busaholic Established Member

    Messages:
    7,992
    Joined:
    7 Jun 2014
    Are you suggesting there wouldn't be a legitimate policing purpose behind releasing the image(s) in these circumstances?
     
  26. muz379

    muz379 Established Member

    Messages:
    1,720
    Joined:
    23 Jan 2014
    Law says that you cannot carry a knife in public without good reason unless the blade is under 3 inches long and its a folding knife . Should the police come to discover your knives and charge you with carrying them illegally it would be for a Court to decide if the reason given is good reason . I would say in these circumstances it is unlikely the police would show any interest
     
  27. WestyAds

    WestyAds Member

    Messages:
    52
    Joined:
    25 Feb 2011
    Location:
    Norfolk, UK
  28. Mathew S

    Mathew S Established Member

    Messages:
    1,488
    Joined:
    7 Aug 2017
    Not for me to make that judgement, but the only circumstances I can think of that would constitute a "legitimate policing purpose" would be either a public appeal to locate a suspect or (not relevant in this case) an appeal for victims/witnesses to assist in building a case. In this specific case, difficult to see either of those justifications being applicable.

    You'll note that now people have been charged, they can be - and are being - named.
     
  29. Bletchleyite

    Bletchleyite Veteran Member

    Messages:
    39,852
    Joined:
    20 Oct 2014
    Location:
    Up and down the south WCML (mostly)
    If the knife was pulled on them. Though best to train them too to run away, handing over wallet and phone first if necessary.
     
  30. theageofthetra

    theageofthetra Established Member

    Messages:
    3,109
    Joined:
    27 May 2012
    Now that two people have been charged why haven't their pictures been released?
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page