• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Manchester Metrolink (Non speculative discussion)

507 001

Established Member
Joined
3 Dec 2008
Messages
1,970
Location
Huyton
What I don't get is why they are running all the altrincham trams through to Bury and terminating all the trams from Picadilly at Crumpsall. Rather than terminating some of the Altrincham trams at Crumpsall and running the Picadilly trams through to Bury.

Operational convenience.

Not everybody who signs the Bury line signs the Ashton line, but everyone who signs the Ashton and Altrincham lines signs the Bury line.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

M60lad

Member
Joined
31 May 2011
Messages
1,000
Do all drivers sign Crumpsall turnback?

Out of interest what would happen in theory if a tram to Crumpsall turnback came into a station to change drivers and then the recovery driver didn't sign it?
 

507 001

Established Member
Joined
3 Dec 2008
Messages
1,970
Location
Huyton
Do all drivers sign Crumpsall turnback?

Out of interest what would happen in theory if a tram to Crumpsall turnback came into a station to change drivers and then the recovery driver didn't sign it?

If they sign the Bury line then yes, and all Drivers (at the moment) sign the Bury line.
 

duffield

Established Member
Joined
31 Jul 2013
Messages
1,804
Location
East Midlands
On my Friday trip I really noticed the various TSRs that have been mentioned here, it seemed to take an age to crawl from Piccadilly to Victoria with those 5mph sections.

Are these all going to be addressed once the current engineering works are complete?

And how much time do they actually add to this section of the line, given that it's presumably pretty slow anyhow without them due to the sharp curves, number of stops, interaction with other traffic etc.?
 

TT-ONR-NRN

Established Member
Joined
30 Dec 2016
Messages
10,858
Location
Salford Quays, Manchester
Does anyone have access to the service diagrams that they don’t mind sharing please? I’d love to see things like whether Bury Piccadilly services ever end up on Piccadilly Altrincham at some point and if they’ll therefore require 3001-3060, and just how many of those units are left over after Altrincham routes are sorted, and which are booked doubles, etc.
 

Tramfan

Member
Joined
19 Mar 2011
Messages
445
Location
.
https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/metrolink_timetables_2024

The timetables have been requested a few times via freedom of information requests, but unfortunately they remove the service diagram numbers which would help to identify what you want. The current (non-engineering work) main timetable requires 2 of 3001-3060 to be allocated to the Etihad Campus - MediaCity service as they move over onto the Altrincham line when it extends to Etihad Campus in the evening, but generally the sets stick to their routes all day.
 

M60lad

Member
Joined
31 May 2011
Messages
1,000
How is the Rochdale line worked these days do trams alternate destinations at East Didsbury? For example does a tram coming from Shaw then do a Rochdale service and does a Rochdale tram then do a Shaw service?

It might explain one of the reasons why that even by early afternoon there are delays/gaps in services sometimes.
 

Tramfan

Member
Joined
19 Mar 2011
Messages
445
Location
.
How is the Rochdale line worked these days do trams alternate destinations at East Didsbury? For example does a tram coming from Shaw then do a Rochdale service and does a Rochdale tram then do a Shaw service?

It might explain one of the reasons why that even by early afternoon there are delays/gaps in services sometimes.
In the normal timetable, yes they do.
 

507 001

Established Member
Joined
3 Dec 2008
Messages
1,970
Location
Huyton
How is the Rochdale line worked these days do trams alternate destinations at East Didsbury? For example does a tram coming from Shaw then do a Rochdale service and does a Rochdale tram then do a Shaw service?

It might explain one of the reasons why that even by early afternoon there are delays/gaps in services sometimes.

Yes they do.

This was settled on after the initial period of 10tph running where there were dedicated Rochdale and Shaw sets proved unworkable.
 

johntea

Established Member
Joined
29 Dec 2010
Messages
2,685
That's a pre-auth to check that the card is working.

The zone 1-4 single of £4.60.

In the end they did charge £4.60 (as in an actual transaction to my bank rather than a ‘pending’ charge) but this morning a £4.60 refund showing as tfgm.com/refunds hit my account (I didn’t get round to contacting them so it was automated rather than me moaning!)

So all a bit odd as I’ve used the card fine on Metrolink several times before, I had a thought it may be the contactless doing the whole security thing where you need to make a PIN transaction every now and again but that doesn’t seem to be it as the transaction happened!

Oh well it all worked out in the end!
 

plugwash

Established Member
Joined
29 May 2015
Messages
1,691
Does anyone know how the metrolink platforms at the airport operate? I understand there are two metrolink platforms at the station, the map on NR seems to indicate that one metrolink platform is inside the NR barriers and the other is outside. On the other hand the photo on wikipedia seems to show orange barriers down the middle of the tram/NR platform.

Do metrolink users have to get manually through the gateline? Do metrolink try to avoid using the platform that is inside the gateline?
 

jfollows

Established Member
Joined
26 Feb 2011
Messages
7,104
Location
Wilmslow
Does anyone know how the metrolink platforms at the airport operate? I understand there are two metrolink platforms at the station, the map on NR seems to indicate that one metrolink platform is inside the NR barriers and the other is outside. On the other hand the photo on wikipedia seems to show orange barriers down the middle of the tram/NR platform.

Do metrolink users have to get manually through the gateline? Do metrolink try to avoid using the platform that is inside the gateline?
Only one platform is used, see https://s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/stations-assets.tfgm.com/maps/station/manchesterairporttram.png for example, there is a gateline to get to either platform I think and certainly to the one used as you say.
Last time I used it the gateline didn’t read tickets and there was no person there so the faceless remote operator had to open the gate, all very unsatisfactory.
I have only ever seen the further platform used, although I haven’t used the tram there much.
 
Last edited:

jfollows

Established Member
Joined
26 Feb 2011
Messages
7,104
Location
Wilmslow
Will the other platform come into use as and when the proposed extension to the Airport line reaches fruition?
I’d expect that’s the reason for it; the service doesn’t currently need both platforms for sure (tram every 12 minutes, 7 minute turn-round between arrival & departure). A good bit of forward thinking if so.

Track plan attached, Railway Track Diagrams Midlands & North West fourth edition 2018. Only platform 6 is currently used. Platform 5 wouldn't involve a gateline if it were used as things stand today.
 

Attachments

  • Manchester Airport.pdf
    38.1 KB · Views: 61
Last edited:

jfollows

Established Member
Joined
26 Feb 2011
Messages
7,104
Location
Wilmslow
That map seems to be completely missing platform 4 So I find it hard to trust anything else it shows.
Yes, it's either old or rubbish, sorry, hence I posted the diagram above instead. But there is a gateline anyway to platform 6 because I’ve had to use it.
 

plugwash

Established Member
Joined
29 May 2015
Messages
1,691
I think the plan was that once the new platform 4 was constructed as an island platform, only one platform face was required for the use of the heavy-rail train services, leaving the other platform face for the eventual use of the Manchester Metrolink system.
Whatever the planning was, and whatever the map jfollows posted shows, I'm pretty confident that the reality on the ground is that there are 6 platform faces, platoforms 1-4 on the heavy rail and two platforms (which don't appear to display numbers, lets call them 5 and 6) connected to the manchester metrolink.

I was just wondering about how they were used operationally, particularly in light of the ticket barriers installed on the heavy rail side in 2018, which appear to include platfor "5" inside the gated area. It sounds like the answer is they avoid using platform "5".

I’d expect that’s the reason for it
I'd have more expected the reason is that a single platform terminus on a double track line is an operational risk.

Bury, Rochdale, Ashton, East didsbury, Altrincham and the Trafford center also all have two metrolink platforms. Eccles seems to be the only metrolink terminus that doesn't.
 

Par

Member
Joined
26 Aug 2009
Messages
316
I'd have more expected the reason is that a single platform terminus on a double Bury, Rochdale, Ashton, East didsbury, Altrincham and the Trafford center also all have two metrolink platforms. Eccles seems to be the only metrolink terminus that doesn't.
Also, Shaw, being both a terminus and through stop, with 3 platforms.
 

sprunt

Established Member
Joined
22 Jul 2017
Messages
1,333
I travelled to/from the airport by tram in June and I didn't have to go through any gates then, or if I did they were open and I just walked through without really registering them.
 

Xenophon PCDGS

Veteran Member
Joined
17 Apr 2011
Messages
33,650
Location
A semi-rural part of north-west England
I travelled to/from the airport by tram in June and I didn't have to go through any gates then, or if I did they were open and I just walked through without really registering them.
There are both stairs and escalators that lead directly on to the Manchester Metrolink platform when coming from the station concourse area. In the past, when I have arrived on a train (seemingly always platform 4 on the journeys that I made) there were gates to allow access to the tram platform, but every time, they were open.
 

507 001

Established Member
Joined
3 Dec 2008
Messages
1,970
Location
Huyton
Platform 5 is for emergency use only, and there are specific procedures that need to be followed when using it.

Its main purpose at the moment is as a stabling siding for when things go a bit pear shaped.
 

Tim33160

Member
Joined
18 Feb 2019
Messages
180
A curious question:

When replacements of steel rail are delivered to the Metrolink worksite - these are long lengths of welded rail eg recent replacements Brooklands to Sale, are these delivered by rail? Is the cross over at Altrincham to/from Network Rail used? or are they welded at the depot?
 

507 001

Established Member
Joined
3 Dec 2008
Messages
1,970
Location
Huyton
A curious question:

When replacements of steel rail are delivered to the Metrolink worksite - these are long lengths of welded rail eg recent replacements Brooklands to Sale, are these delivered by rail? Is the cross over at Altrincham to/from Network Rail used? or are they welded at the depot?

They’re delivered in short lengths and then welded at the renewal site.
 

billh

Member
Joined
7 Jan 2015
Messages
261
Asking for a friend here: he has recently become a wheelchair user and is contemplating using Metrolink to commute to work. The TFGM accessibility document states max. height of wheelchair and user as 1350mm. He is a tall person and in the powered chair , this limit is exceeded. What is the reason for this somewhat low height restriction and would he get kicked off the system for non compliance?
 

Par

Member
Joined
26 Aug 2009
Messages
316
Asking for a friend here: he has recently become a wheelchair user and is contemplating using Metrolink to commute to work. The TFGM accessibility document states max. height of wheelchair and user as 1350mm. He is a tall person and in the powered chair , this limit is exceeded. What is the reason for this somewhat low height restriction and would he get kicked off the system for non compliance?
I can’t answer the question for the rationale, but I’ve seen powered chairs several times and no one has ever raised any concerns at all. I’d be amazed frankly if he were to be refused travel.
 

507 001

Established Member
Joined
3 Dec 2008
Messages
1,970
Location
Huyton
Asking for a friend here: he has recently become a wheelchair user and is contemplating using Metrolink to commute to work. The TFGM accessibility document states max. height of wheelchair and user as 1350mm. He is a tall person and in the powered chair , this limit is exceeded. What is the reason for this somewhat low height restriction and would he get kicked off the system for non compliance?

Nobody is carrying a tape measure around, he’ll be fine :)
 

Par

Member
Joined
26 Aug 2009
Messages
316
Wheelchair accessibility is pretty good in my view, the platform and floor heights are fantastically well aligned.
 

Top