With the announcement of the rail timetable today to be ramped up soon again, and the investment in transport, there could be major changes to the medium term rail timetable.
Would reducing more intercity services but increasing local services be a good thing where possible? It can definitely be plausible to help social distancings. Realistically this will go on for some time, and a work at home scenario will be increasing more and more, with staggered timings. This will mean especially from the villages and towns outside of london and Manchester for example, lower intercity and regional train service usage, whereas a quick increase in urban areas of Manchester and London
Examples:
> Stansted Airport won't need 4tph. Cambridge could have it's off peak service into LST increased by 2tph, to allow for increased distancing, with two other paths either going to Hertford/Cheshunt/Enfield/Chingford - do-able with the spare 317s and soon spare 315s, with the new LO stock well underway.
> London to Norwich can probably stay at 1tph for the foreseeable - Ipswich in peaks also 1. This can increase temporary capacity to Southend/Chelmsford using spare GA 317s ETC.
> Heathrow express - I'm not too sure in the rights the government would have in forcing the TOC here to stop this service for the medium term, potentially picking up again late 2020/ early 2021 - this can lead to spare paths for trains to slowers Slough/Reading/Maidenhead/Hayes and Harlington, or semi-fasts to Bedwyn/Oxford/Banbury/Didcot.
> Thameslink - reducing the amount of ECML from KGX to Edinburgh, and increasing services to Peterborough/Cambridge with spare 700s on services yet to be deployed
How do you think the medium term timetable will look?
Would reducing more intercity services but increasing local services be a good thing where possible? It can definitely be plausible to help social distancings. Realistically this will go on for some time, and a work at home scenario will be increasing more and more, with staggered timings. This will mean especially from the villages and towns outside of london and Manchester for example, lower intercity and regional train service usage, whereas a quick increase in urban areas of Manchester and London
Examples:
> Stansted Airport won't need 4tph. Cambridge could have it's off peak service into LST increased by 2tph, to allow for increased distancing, with two other paths either going to Hertford/Cheshunt/Enfield/Chingford - do-able with the spare 317s and soon spare 315s, with the new LO stock well underway.
> London to Norwich can probably stay at 1tph for the foreseeable - Ipswich in peaks also 1. This can increase temporary capacity to Southend/Chelmsford using spare GA 317s ETC.
> Heathrow express - I'm not too sure in the rights the government would have in forcing the TOC here to stop this service for the medium term, potentially picking up again late 2020/ early 2021 - this can lead to spare paths for trains to slowers Slough/Reading/Maidenhead/Hayes and Harlington, or semi-fasts to Bedwyn/Oxford/Banbury/Didcot.
> Thameslink - reducing the amount of ECML from KGX to Edinburgh, and increasing services to Peterborough/Cambridge with spare 700s on services yet to be deployed
How do you think the medium term timetable will look?