Jim said:grrrrr, why do they always put 392 on there instead of Waterloo ....
Cuz it's the odd one out (in terms of number and appearence)?Jim said:grrrrr, why do they always put 392 on there instead of Waterloo
In what way? They look the same to me.dvn1357 said:Great shots!
I see that 153 369 has had a repaint since i saw it on the 14th!
http://motteram.fotopic.net/p25451154.html
http://paigntonrailwaycentre.50webs.com/140106.htm
Coxster said:In what way? They look the same to me.dvn1357 said:Great shots!
I see that 153 369 has had a repaint since i saw it on the 14th!
http://motteram.fotopic.net/p25451154.html
http://paigntonrailwaycentre.50webs.com/140106.htm
Thanks Jim,sorry for any confusion to anyone.Jim said:IIRC, 369 is Looe, st ives is 329
Good job you didn't goto Eastleigh today, when i walked over the shop at 12:00 there was bugger all in the yard apart from some auto ballast wagons which were opposite the station, the 08 was switched off!ChrisM said:A cold few hours spent at Millbrook station to sample some freight action aswel as a couple of units.