Chris Page
Member
- Joined
- 14 Jul 2019
- Messages
- 18
I've just found out this week that I didn't pass my MMI. I was told it related to Area C. Does this mean question 3 or is it a more general characteristic that spans all of the six questions?
Did they just literally say ‘Area C’? I assume this was just the standard rejection email or similar? You’ll probably be able to get more in depth reasoning in any feedback you request.I've just found out this week that I didn't pass my MMI. I was told it related to Area C. Does this mean question 3 or is it a more general characteristic that spans all of the six questions?
Did they just literally say ‘Area C’? I assume this was just the standard rejection email or similar? You’ll probably be able to get more in depth reasoning in any feedback you request.
Sorry to hear this. Is this your first attempt?
There is no way you will get all of those criteria in every answer, if anyone says they do/can is not being honestAdvice I can give is
All 6 answers need to relate to the driver role and or skills you are also assessed on your verbal communication skills.
They want to know what YOU did, what's actions did You take.
Difficult situation but still expected to deliver would be to do with remaining composed, calm, being pro active in making judgements, communicating effectively with the relevant parties, being in control.
So all 6 of your answers think if what a driver must possess
Communication
Problem solving
Fault finding
Pro active
In control
Risk aware of situations and environment
Maintain concentration
Can work alone for long periods
Monotonous work pattern
Cope with long training periods
Handle low stimulation
All of these need to go in every answer
Ideally don't lie but if you don't have any experience you can't leave it blank
More truthful your answers are more in detail you can go
No, but the six questions you answer you will comfortably use those on more than one occasion. Remember, the more in depth you go with your answers the better your outcome will be. They will probe your answer, ask how the situation made you feel, how what you done made you feel etc etc. Very easy to be caught out if you do lie.There is no way you will get all of those criteria in every answer, if anyone says they do/can is not being honest
There is no way you will get all of those criteria in every answer, if anyone says they do/can is not being honest
Also i found in my MMi that the questioner probes for extra information or detail by the questions they ask. Maybe think back to the interviewers manner and the questions they asked you to see where maybe you went wrong.
From what I understand questions are referred to in numbers and the areas relates to the competency you are scored against. You are scored against each competency across all questions giving you a combined score for each area. So area C will refer to a specific competency such as communication. I’m not saying that is what it is but I am sure if you ask them they would tell you? They will also know which of your answers scored the least points in each competency area which they may also tell you on feedback so you could perhaps know which examples need to be worked on in the future.
Thank you for this. Unfortunately the feedback given is all they will tell me. Hopefully i'll do better on the next attempt, i'd just like to be able to improve my chances. Nobody said this was easy!
Have you read the other MMI tips thread on here added recently Chris? Someone posted the competencies there.
Thank you for this. Unfortunately the feedback given is all they will tell me. Hopefully i'll do better on the next attempt, i'd just like to be able to improve my chances. Nobody said this was easy!
This is a very good point. I went through the driver application process all the way through stage 1, DMI and the stage 2 computer assessments only to fall at the last hurdle which was the MMI. It became clear to me very quickly that the interviewer (who worked for the TOC not OPC) had either had a bad day or didn’t like the look of me as you succinctly put it.Like many others I agree its silly that there's thousands of capable drivers who've passed all the written and computer tests that test all the abilities of a driver would need but they fail on a personality exam.... Which is done by another human. The tests have a score and can be measured, if you have an interviewer who's had a bad day, dosent like the look of you it's all in there hands if you go through.
Loads of people feel like there MMI went bad and passed and loads felt it went amazing and well and failed. So it very hit and miss and don't think it should be apart of the exams.
Yes they are trained and qualified by the RSSB but don't you think a driver manager who's actually driven trains and likely has experiences and incidents to determine if an applicant would make a decent driver rather than a qualified non driving person.
I think they should assess those personality questions in the DMI
This is a very good point. I went through the driver application process all the way through stage 1, DMI and the stage 2 computer assessments only to fall at the last hurdle which was the MMI. It became clear to me very quickly that the interviewer (who worked for the TOC not OPC) had either had a bad day or didn’t like the look of me as you succinctly put it.
The interview became an aggressive Gestapo style interrogation and lasted two hours. All my answers were written out verbatim in longhand so I kept having to stop my answer every few words to let the interviewer catch up with what I’d said. She kept pushing and pushing and pushing me to describe my feelings about one particular incident and kept going back to it; I suspect she thought I’d invented it but it was true and I stuck with it. When I tried to answer the question about doing something that’s similar to the train driver’s role I started describing working as a signaller alone in a signalbox concentrating and carrying out safety critical tasks for 12 hour shifts but was told that it wasn’t a suitable comparison and I’d have to come up with a different example there and then. The whole thing was horrendous.
I knew I’d failed before we’d even got half way and it was so unpleasant and demoralising that I have never bothered applying for a driver’s job again. It’s such a subjective test - there’s no third party present or recording made to review it or how it was conducted, only the notes the interviewer makes which could say anything - that it shouldn’t have any part in recruitment. It’s just pseudoscience and I’m surprised RSSB didn’t drop it at their most recent review.
You need 5 posts or more to PM I believe.Hi I’m new to this site, firstly how do you even dm people? Secondly I have stage 2 assessments coming up soon, any help or advice would be hugely appreciated. What sort of questions are asked? Thanks
This is a very good point. I went through the driver application process all the way through stage 1, DMI and the stage 2 computer assessments only to fall at the last hurdle which was the MMI. It became clear to me very quickly that the interviewer (who worked for the TOC not OPC) had either had a bad day or didn’t like the look of me as you succinctly put it.
The interview became an aggressive Gestapo style interrogation and lasted two hours. All my answers were written out verbatim in longhand so I kept having to stop my answer every few words to let the interviewer catch up with what I’d said. She kept pushing and pushing and pushing me to describe my feelings about one particular incident and kept going back to it; I suspect she thought I’d invented it but it was true and I stuck with it. When I tried to answer the question about doing something that’s similar to the train driver’s role I started describing working as a signaller alone in a signalbox concentrating and carrying out safety critical tasks for 12 hour shifts but was told that it wasn’t a suitable comparison and I’d have to come up with a different example there and then. The whole thing was horrendous.
I knew I’d failed before we’d even got half way and it was so unpleasant and demoralising that I have never bothered applying for a driver’s job again. It’s such a subjective test - there’s no third party present or recording made to review it or how it was conducted, only the notes the interviewer makes which could say anything - that it shouldn’t have any part in recruitment. It’s just pseudoscience and I’m surprised RSSB didn’t drop it at their most recent review.
Yes I did wonder this at the time. But at the end of the day you’re not there as part of SAS escape and evasion training so there’s no excuse for the interviewer not to at least be polite to you. As you say yourself it’s just a job so why the need for a two hour hostile one-to-one interrogation?Have you considered that this may have been 'part of the test'?