• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

MML Electrification: progress updates

59CosG95

Established Member
Joined
18 Aug 2013
Messages
6,489
Location
Between Peterborough & Bedlington
Can confirm via a LinkedIn post that piling has resumed for KO1a OLE work, on the Fasts in the Kettering area.

Another LinkedIn update - the OLE between Bedford & Kettering/Corby (i.e. KO1, not KO1a) has now been permanently energised. https://www.linkedin.com/posts/alex...safetyfirst-activity-6737135255100129280-tIJf

In the early hours of this morning the L2C project (Electrification from Bedford to Kettering to Corby) was permanently energised. This happened with much less fanfare than the projects other large milestones as the system had already been tested. But for our team this was a major milestone. It couldn't have happened without the safety case to support it So congratulations to everyone that worked on or fed into the ERR process!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

WymoWanderer

Member
Joined
18 Dec 2017
Messages
114
Location
Between BDM and WEL
I have just posted a video of a Class 360 being moved from Cricklewood to Kettering over on the EMR 360 thread.

A couple of pictures of it here too.
 

Attachments

  • EF2B4328-5847-40EB-9EC4-55EB662E3193.jpeg
    EF2B4328-5847-40EB-9EC4-55EB662E3193.jpeg
    1.6 MB · Views: 144
  • 368A0544-EF6B-4FBD-A505-FC9FD41B889B.jpeg
    368A0544-EF6B-4FBD-A505-FC9FD41B889B.jpeg
    2.6 MB · Views: 143

59CosG95

Established Member
Joined
18 Aug 2013
Messages
6,489
Location
Between Peterborough & Bedlington
I have just posted a video of a Class 360 being moved from Cricklewood to Kettering over on the EMR 360 thread.

A couple of pictures of it here too.
Quite a significant moment this, thanks for sharing!

I've done a bit more research into the Mk3 OLE used on the MML, specifically the single-track cantilevers.
For speeds below 200 km/h (125mph), cantilevers look like this, as seen here at Ampthill.
50207642661_e800de5ea7_k.jpg

The steady arms on the cantilevers have a shallow curve, and don't allow for the greater uplift given by pantographs at higher speeds. In addition, the lower horizontal tube requires a nose dropper, whether pull-off (toward mast) or push-off (away from mast), and the steady arms require windstays to prevent them form being unhooked.

For 200 km/h speeds and above, these cantilevers are used (as seen at Frinkley Lane, ECML).
1606994784343.png

These arms have a deep curve and a larger bracket separation (around 300mm nominal); the nominal gap between the contact wire and the bottom cantilever tube is also around 150mm larger. Also note the fixings for the steady arms are different; the 'drop down' allows for the 'heel setting' (arm pivot to contact wire) to be adjusted more easily. This feature isn't present in the cantilevers seen at Ampthill (or anywhere else on the 80s-era MML OLE).

Hope this attempts to clear things up a bit!

Edit: The only Mk3 registrations which appear to be 125mph capable are the mechanically independent registrations in Luton Airport Parkway, singular structures (i.e. one portal or TTC) at Harpenden, Leagrave & Flitwick, and a half tension length or so north of Elstree & Borehamwood; for the latter, a mid-point anchor portal was installed and all headspans to the northern overlap (+ 1 to the south) were replaced with MIRs from 4-track portals. (The Fasts then have 4 STCs on each road south of that last portal before Elstree & Borehamwood station; admittedly the linespeed here is 110 max.)
Edit 2: Brent Cross West is also getting MIRs of a similar style.

Edit 3: another thing to consider for a 125mph upgrade that meets the TSI requirements is grading. The maximum ruling contact wire gradient for a 125mph railway when approaching a level crossing is 1:625 (i.e. 1:5*(linespeed in mph)) while the maximum change in gradient is 1:10*(linespeed in mph) i.e. 1:1250.
While there aren't any locations I'm aware of where this might be a problem (IIRC the first L.C. is at Sawley), grading is trickier with headspans than M.I.Rs.
 
Last edited:

Bald Rick

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Sep 2010
Messages
29,171
Quite a significant moment this, thanks for sharing!

I've done a bit more research into the Mk3 OLE used on the MML, specifically the single-track cantilevers.
For speeds below 200 km/h (125mph), cantilevers look like this, as seen here at Ampthill.
View attachment 86713

The steady arms on the cantilevers have a shallow curve, and don't allow for the greater uplift given by pantographs at higher speeds. In addition, the lower horizontal tube requires a nose dropper, whether pull-off (toward mast) or push-off (away from mast), and the steady arms require windstays to prevent them form being unhooked.

For 200 km/h speeds and above, these cantilevers are used (as seen at Frinkley Lane, ECML).
View attachment 86714

These arms have a deep curve and a larger bracket separation (around 300mm nominal); the nominal gap between the contact wire and the bottom cantilever tube is also around 150mm larger. Also note the fixings for the steady arms are different; the 'drop down' allows for the 'heel setting' (arm pivot to contact wire) to be adjusted more easily. This feature isn't present in the cantilevers seen at Ampthill (or anywhere else on the 80s-era MML OLE).

Hope this attempts to clear things up a bit!

Edit: The only Mk3 registrations which appear to be 125mph capable are the mechanically independent registrations in Luton Airport Parkway and a half tension length or so north of Elstree & Borehamwood; for the latter, a mid-point anchor portal was installed and all headspans to the northern overlap (+ 1 to the south) were replaced with MIRs from 4-track portals. (The Fasts then have 4 STCs on each road south of that last portal before Elstree & Borehamwood station; admittedly the linespeed here is 110 max.)
Edit 2: Brent Cross West is also getting MIRs of a similar style.

Really useful knowledge, thanks for digging that out!

And you’re right about Elstree & Borehamwood.
 

59CosG95

Established Member
Joined
18 Aug 2013
Messages
6,489
Location
Between Peterborough & Bedlington
Really useful knowledge, thanks for digging that out!

And you’re right about Elstree & Borehamwood.
No worries Rick, it is (to be fair) a perk of the job 8-)

On an updating front, the latest "Progressometer" for the MML is now out - the main changes being with regards to the proposed new sectioning compounds for KO1a.

MML Wiring Progressometer 47.0 (Updated as of 3rd of December 2020)
Mileages are from St. Pancras. Unless mentioned otherwise, all reference to the "Fast" side refers to tracks on the western side of the "10-foot" (centre of the track pairs), and the "Slow" side for the tracks on the eastern side.
KO1 wiring (Bedford to Kettering/Corby) complete.

South of Bedford
  • 16 new structures have been erected to replace headspans between Cricklewood & the North Circular; these are confirmed to be part of the works for the new Brent Cross West station.
  • KO1a - Proposed Power Supply Upgrade Infrastructure south of Bedford station:
    • Napsbury ATS (Auto Transformer Site); Assumed to be near the North Orbital Commercial Park as that's the only RRAP south of St Albans. No obvious signs of work yet; 3 of the 4 rubber RRAP mats are missing.
    • East Hyde MPATS (Mid Point AT Site); compound established off Cooters Hill Lane. Potential RRAP materials (rubber mats) appear to be in the compound now, based off NR AirOps surveys.
    • Leagrave SATS (Sectioning ATS); compound off to the SE of Leagrave car park, previously overgrown, now de-vegetated. No other signs of work so far.
    • Chalton ATFS; pretty much ready. Works on 11/12 July seem to show that it was commissioned, but has not yet replaced the old Sundon FS. (The oil bunds assumed to be for the autotransformers are in fact too small for ATs (based on other sites), so it's difficult to tell if ATs will be installed here at all, or whether the civils required for ATs will come later)
      Sundon FS is yet to be disconnected as of 23/11/20.
    • Ampthill TSC (new); LIVE. The legacy TSC was decommissioned as the new ASG container was commissioned, with a simplified spanwire disconnector arrangement, over 11/12 July 2020. Designed as Ampthill SATS, but no ATF provision yet, so it only functions as a TSC for now. The old TSC is still on site as of 23/11/20.
    • Bedford TSC (new); LIVE. The legacy slow-lines only TSC was decommissioned as the new ASG container was commissioned, with a simplified spanwire disconnector arrangement, over 11/12 July 2020. (No ATF provision yet, however, so it only functions as a TSC.)
      The old TSC is still on site as of 23/11/20.

Bedford (49m 65ch) - Wellingborough (65m 09ch); LIVE
  • Wires through Bedford on the Down Fast (P4) are now complete. Additionally, the existing wires on Platforms 2 & 3 are now extended to Tensorex portal SPC2/80/599, replacing the former Balance Weights north of the island platform.
  • Bromham Rd O/B now reopened - the temporary footbridge has been removed.
  • Irthlingborough Road Bridge has now been replaced - its reopening date has been pushed back to December 2020.
  • Sharnbrook MPTSC (Mid-Point Track Sectioning Cabinet), north of Templars Way overbridge, has been LIVE since 20/4/20. (This was designed to be a MPATS, but was de-scoped when OLE was cut back to Kettering)
  • The switching site at Wymington (Irchester TSC) is now LIVE. (This was designed to be a SATS, but was de-scoped when OLE was cut back to Kettering)

Wellingborough (65m 09ch) - Kettering (72m 01ch); LIVE
  • Work to return the 4th platform (P4) at Wellingborough to public use is now well advanced.
  • All lines are now wired within Wellingborough station. These continue along all lines to Kettering.
  • North of Wellingborough, the Down Goods Loop (west of the Down Fast) and the Arrival/Departure Line (adjacent to the not-yet-in-service Up Slow) are now wired, along with the westernmost siding in Wellingborough Up Yard. There doesn't seem to be any concrete plan to put northern access into the yard yet, though.
  • The feeding/switching site at the old site of Finedon Station has been confirmed as Harrowden TSC; it was designed as Harrowden ATS but until the autotransformers arrive it's a TSC. Bonding assumed to be complete.

Kettering (72m 01ch) - Glendon Jct (74m 00ch) - Corby (79m 40ch); LIVE
  • All 4 lines are now wired through Kettering station. On the Fasts, wires finish at Tensorex portal SPC3/116/654 (also the live limit on the Fasts; 72m 40ch), while those on the Slows continue to Glendon Jct & Corby, and thence to the limits of wiring.
    Limits of Wiring:
    • Down Corby: GSM1/127/641.
    • Up Corby: GSM1/128/317.
    • Corby Reception Line: GSM1/128/478. (79m 68ch)
  • At Glendon, the new Kettering North SATS (Sectioning Autotransformer Site; TSC until 810s arrive) has been connected to the OLE on the Corby lines. Spanwires for the Main lines are coiled up O.O.U. until wires head to Market Harborough.

Glendon Jct (74m 00ch) - Market Harborough (82m 74ch) - part of Key Output 1A
  • Braybrooke Substation (ATFS) approved. To be located here: (https://goo.gl/maps/fuy1uZeDjdQ2).
  • Enabling Works happened; the land has now been returned to its original state (possibly to keep land in original condition?). Civils & Electrical Design contract awarded.
  • The extent of wiring towards Market Harborough has now been as good as confirmed to reach the station. Approval has been given for final design work to be carried out on that section of route.
  • Ground Investigation Works are taking place between Kettering & Great Bowden (north of Market Harborough); this implies Great Bowden will be the northern limit of wiring until further wiring gets authorised.
  • Piling Works have begun on the Fasts in the Kettering area for new masts.

The Future - Midlands Engine Rail (Midlands Connect), MMLU Key Output 2 & HS2
  • Electrification proposed from Market Harborough to Leicester, Loughborough, Nottingham & Derby; as part of the Midlands Connect strategy. The March 2020 Budget committed to the scheme; details were alleged to be found in the July Spending Review. When this will actually be released (what with COVID-19) remains to be seen.
  • Electrification proposed from Clay Cross HS2 Connection to Sheffield (Midland) as part of HS2 works.
  • Currently, no electrification is proposed between Clay Cross HS2 Connection & Nottingham, or Tupton & Derby (via Belper).

    Any updates would be greatly appreciated.
 

59CosG95

Established Member
Joined
18 Aug 2013
Messages
6,489
Location
Between Peterborough & Bedlington
15/12/20 Piling update: 2 pairs of piles for an Anchor Portal have gone in adjacent to the Fasts at Kettering North Jct. https://flic.kr/p/2kg2w88
One pair is to the left of the "Blue Pullman" set shown in the photo, while the other pair is below and to the right of the "40" speed limit sign. This will doubtless be for the crossover wire runs at Kettering North Jn itself; note that the smaller tie piles are on the "London" side. The Anchor Portal in the background over the Slows/Corby Lines is also for the crossover, and has its struts in the opposite orientation to how it will be here.
 

John Webb

Established Member
Joined
5 Jun 2010
Messages
3,065
Location
St Albans
Napsbury ATS (Auto Transformer Site); Assumed to be near the North Orbital Commercial Park as that's the only RRAP south of St Albans. No obvious signs of work yet; 3 of the 4 rubber RRAP mats are missing.
I assume 'RRAP mat' is the 'Road Rail Access Point mat' which allows Road-Rail vehicles to get on and off the track. Must admit I'd not really noticed these at Napsbury, but there is a mat for the two fast lines just south of St Albans accessed from the former parcels platform area. We quite often get R-R vehicles parked outside the box in the station car park when weekend works are planned.
I hadn't noticed any action on the Napsbury site last week - will be passing it again tomorrow and will take a look, but I would have thought unlikely unless they are planning to do something over the Christmas break?
 

59CosG95

Established Member
Joined
18 Aug 2013
Messages
6,489
Location
Between Peterborough & Bedlington
I assume 'RRAP mat' is the 'Road Rail Access Point mat' which allows Road-Rail vehicles to get on and off the track. Must admit I'd not really noticed these at Napsbury, but there is a mat for the two fast lines just south of St Albans accessed from the former parcels platform area. We quite often get R-R vehicles parked outside the box in the station car park when weekend works are planned.
I hadn't noticed any action on the Napsbury site last week - will be passing it again tomorrow and will take a look, but I would have thought unlikely unless they are planning to do something over the Christmas break?
Possibly, although I suspect the MML will be kept as open as possible with King's X being shut for an extended period.
RRAPs don't take long to install in normal circs.
 

John Webb

Established Member
Joined
5 Jun 2010
Messages
3,065
Location
St Albans
Napsbury Access point checked this afternoon on way back from St Albans South. Portable mess cabin and two 'portaloos' have arrived since I last looked, and there were no less than four of the smaller road-rail elevating platform machines parked up on site.
 

hwl

Established Member
Joined
5 Feb 2012
Messages
7,389
Possibly, although I suspect the MML will be kept as open as possible with King's X being shut for an extended period.
RRAPs don't take long to install in normal circs.
52 hours of access with no electrified trains running so it would be surprising if they weren't aiming to get some (re-)electrification work done.
 

59CosG95

Established Member
Joined
18 Aug 2013
Messages
6,489
Location
Between Peterborough & Bedlington
A further mini-update on the Sectioning & Feeding plans for the MML, both KO1 & KO1a, based off the Major Feeding Diagram.

Existing (pre-works): Black
New (KO1): Red
To be removed (KO1): Green
Other Projects: Light Blue
New (KO1a): Brown
Future Scope: Purple

Kilometres from St. Pancras.

Current AT Feeding Area
  • Kentish Town SATS (2.8km); installed as part of Thameslink Programme.
  • Legacy Grahame Park FS (13.5km) replaced by Grahame Park SATS; part of Thameslink Programme. Can still feed south of OHNS from 132kV grid (DNO).
  • Borehamwood ATFS (21.7km); installed as part of Thameslink Programme. Connected to Elstree Grid (400kV).
Current RC/BT Feeding Area
  • Radlett (Track Sectioning) Cabin (24.3km); TSC to be replaced by Radlett Station TSS (24.3km) as VCBs not viable point of isolation.
  • Napsbury TSC (30.0km); to be sited on Up side of MML. Possibly off the N Orbital Commercial Park? Future scope for ATs.
  • Sandridge Road (St Albans) MPTSC (34.2km) - existing. Fate unknown.
  • East Hyde MPTSC (42.6km); to be sited on Down side of MML. Compound established off Cooters End Ln in 2017, but only now being filled with materials. Assumed to replace Sandridge Rd MPTSC. Future scope for ATs.
  • Luton Hoo TSC (46.1km) - existing. Fate unknown.
  • Leagrave SATS - no idea where it’s planned to be. Possibly SE of the station? Assumed to replace the one at Luton Airport Pkwy. Possibly descoped?
  • Long Meadow Farm (Chalton) ATFS (56.2km), replaces Sundon FS (57.1km on 132kV circuit). Old FS still in use AFAIK. Future scope for ATs. Connected to Sundon Grid (400kV).
  • Ampthill TSC (67.3km); upgrade with new ASG building complete. Old Ampthill TSC now decommissioned but still on site.
    • Originally proposed as Ampthill SATS, but ATs possible to be added in future scope.
    • -25kV busbar permanently earthed.​
  • Elstow TSS (76.624km) added over the Slow lines only. Located north of the stone terminal.
  • Bedford TSC (79.8km); upgrade with new ASG building complete. Old Bedford TSC (79.76km) now decommissioned but still on site.
    • Originally proposed as Bedford ATS, but AT possible to be added in future scope.
    • -25kV Busbar permanently earthed.​
    • Future scope to cater for Marston Vale line if wired.
    • No bus-section provision made as Bedford TSC would become an ATS if MML goes full AT.

Current Boosterless Classic Feeding Area
  • Bedford North TSS (80.79km) added, originally over the Slow lines only. All lines covered.
  • Sharnbrook MPTSC (91.0km); complete.
    • Originally proposed as Sharnbrook MPATS, but ATs possible to be added in future scope.
    • -25kV Busbar permanently earthed.​
  • Irchester (Wymington) TSC (98.3km); complete.
    • Originally proposed as Irchester SATS, but ATs possible to be added in future scope.
    • -25kV Busbar permanently earthed.​
  • Harrowden TSC (109.7km); complete.
    • Originally proposed as Harrowden ATS, but AT possible to be added in future scope.
    • -25kV Busbar permanently earthed.​
    • No bus-section provision made as Harrowden TSC would become an ATS if MML goes full AT.
  • Kettering North TSC (119.9km); complete.
    • Originally proposed as Kettering North SATS, but ATs possible to be added in future scope.
    • -25kV Busbar permanently earthed.​
  • Braybrooke ATFS (131km). To feed in classic originally, with AT scope possible in future. To be fed from new National Grid connection at Market Harborough.
    • Yet to be constructed. Most likely deferred to KO1a.


KO1A Electrification to end south of Bridge 28F ~134km.
Hendon Lines Electrification originally part of GW scope (Acton Yard to Hendon via Dudding Hill). Carlton Rd Jn - Junction Rd Jn (GOBLIN) originally part of GOBLIN Electrification scope. Both descoped.

This was also published on the Harborough FM website last week, and features a video appearing to detail the KO1a works: https://harboroughfm.co.uk/rail-electrification-to-market-harborough-moves-closer/

In summary: 6 overbridges are to be altered, Napsbury & East Hyde are definitely happening, UKMS125 OLE going up between Kettering & Mkt H'boro, and Borehamwood to Bedford will be de-boostered.
 
Last edited:

21C101

Established Member
Joined
19 Jul 2014
Messages
2,548
From the posts above, are we going to see wholesale renewal of catenary fixtures and fittings between Bedford and London to support the 125mph electric running?
 

Bald Rick

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Sep 2010
Messages
29,171
From the posts above, are we going to see wholesale renewal of catenary fixtures and fittings between Bedford and London to support the 125mph electric running?

Fast lines only, and probably only for sections >100mph, but yes, I think that is the plan. When someone agrees to pay for it.
 

59CosG95

Established Member
Joined
18 Aug 2013
Messages
6,489
Location
Between Peterborough & Bedlington
As it's headspans, wouldn't that affect a lot of the Slows as well?
Not necessarily. The headspans (well, certainly those on all other 125mph Mk3 routes) are 125mph capable from the off; it's the single track cantilevers which need to be changed.
1608280910711.png
These Mk3 cantilevers (behind the UKMS ones) are 125mph capable, while the vast majority of those on the MML can't do speeds above 200km/h (just under 125).
Of note, SPL Powerlines are also currently replacing failing Mk3 structures on the Hertford Loop with SICAT (i.e. Siemens) cantilevers, so these could be a potential replacement for the Mk3 range where required.

The GWEP/Crossrail programme also replaced crossed-contact crossover wiring arrangements between Old Oak Common & Airport Jn with mechanically independent tangential wiring arrangements, mainly over the Mains but also over the Reliefs in some locations. As a "do-minimum" that might be possible.

Areas over the Fasts that are 125 for HSTs (and would be for 810s):
12m 70ch to 18m 38ch (Elstree to Napsbury inc. Radlett Jn)
35m 43ch to 49m 46ch (Sundon to Bedford inc. Harlington, Flitwick, Flitwick Jn, Ampthill Tunnels & Bedford South Jn) Down Fast only
49m 65ch to 42m 18ch (Bedford to Ampthill Tunnels inc. Bedford South Jn) Up Fast only
34m 23ch to 31m 16ch (Leagrave to Luton inc. Leagrave Jn) Up Fast only
 
Last edited:

21C101

Established Member
Joined
19 Jul 2014
Messages
2,548
Not necessarily. The headspans (well, certainly those on all other 125mph Mk3 routes) are 125mph capable from the off; it's the single track cantilevers which need to be changed.
View attachment 87272
These Mk3 cantilevers (behind the UKMS ones) are 125mph capable, while the vast majority of those on the MML can't do speeds above 200km/h (just under 125).
Of note, SPL Powerlines are also currently replacing failing Mk3 structures on the Hertford Loop with SICAT (i.e. Siemens) cantilevers, so these could be a potential replacement for the Mk3 range where required.

The GWEP/Crossrail programme also replaced crossed-contact crossover wiring arrangements between Old Oak Common & Airport Jn with mechanically independent tangential wiring arrangements, mainly over the Mains but also over the Reliefs in some locations. As a "do-minimum" that might be possible.
That must be a relief. Individual cantilevers (rather than hesdspans) are, relatively few and far between on the MML.

While that is a total pain if you get a dewirement, it is very advantageous in this case.
 

59CosG95

Established Member
Joined
18 Aug 2013
Messages
6,489
Location
Between Peterborough & Bedlington
That must be a relief. Individual cantilevers (rather than hesdspans) are, relatively few and far between on the MML.

While that is a total pain if you get a dewirement, it is very advantageous in this case.
Indeed it is. Of course, with the booster removal, we've yet to see whether the insulated overlaps at booster locations will be converted to uninsulated overlaps; these would probably come as part of conductor renewals.
Napsbury Access point checked this afternoon on way back from St Albans South. Portable mess cabin and two 'portaloos' have arrived since I last looked, and there were no less than four of the smaller road-rail elevating platform machines parked up on site.
There are, IIRC, 4 single track cantilevers either side of Napsbury Rd O/B, so it would make sense to trial any potential cantilever replacements there IMO.
 

hwl

Established Member
Joined
5 Feb 2012
Messages
7,389
Indeed it is. Of course, with the booster removal, we've yet to see whether the insulated overlaps at booster locations will be converted to uninsulated overlaps; these would probably come as part of conductor renewals.

There are, IIRC, 4 single track cantilevers either side of Napsbury Rd O/B, so it would make sense to trial any potential cantilever replacements there IMO.
But that would still leave a lot of the tensioning to be upgraded (has been problematic in recent hot weather) which is still a reasonably sized job that will take along time with 60+ wire runs to change the tensioning on (new mid pint anchoring arrangements too?)
 

59CosG95

Established Member
Joined
18 Aug 2013
Messages
6,489
Location
Between Peterborough & Bedlington
But that would still leave a lot of the tensioning to be upgraded (has been problematic in recent hot weather) which is still a reasonably sized job that will take along time with 60+ wire runs to change the tensioning on (new mid pint anchoring arrangements too?)
If new MPA Arrangements are used, and the wires are converted from Mk3b to, say, Mk3d, then the tensioning arrangements wouldn't have to change that much (other than the installation of solid booms at mid points). If, however, they decide to convert it all to a UKMS variant (which seems less likely), the tensioning arrangements would have to be nearly completely redone as the max lengths are different.
On Mk3b/Mk3d, wire runs have a maximum distance of 985m between the furthest AT anchor and the mid-point (i.e. the half-tension length); those with headspans also give a max distance of 775m to the last contact wire registration point.
On UKMS, this decreases to 750m, with a maximum variation of 15% between each half-tension length; as a result, you'd have more wire runs overall.
 

WymoWanderer

Member
Joined
18 Dec 2017
Messages
114
Location
Between BDM and WEL
According to this Network Rail press release, the fourth line and platform 4 at Wellingborough are now in use.

Press Release

On Sunday (20, December 2020) the new fourth track between Bedford and Kettering and the new platform at Wellingborough station were brought into use. These are the latest completed improvements as part of the Midland Main Line Upgrade, which will deliver a brand new, improved timetable for passengers in 2021.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Bob Buckler

Member
Joined
12 Feb 2018
Messages
16
Irthlingborough Road bridge at Wellingborough opened to road traffic on 28 December.

Same width as demolished bridge. One way traffic controlled by traffic lights.
 

paul1609

Established Member
Joined
28 Jan 2006
Messages
7,234
Location
Wittersham Kent
Fast lines only, and probably only for sections >100mph, but yes, I think that is the plan. When someone agrees to pay for it.
How much time do the sections of 100mph + save south of Bedford?
Does this reduce line capacity over a straight 100 mph railway?
 

Pumbaa

Established Member
Joined
19 Feb 2008
Messages
4,982
3 minutes in one direction, 3.5 in the other. Enough to make a material difference and would essentially wipe out JT gains made by multimillion pound investments in the form of Derby resignalling, Leicester LSI, Market Harborough LSI - and would need a very significant recast to achieve too, going well beyond the scope of the (what should be now) May 21 timetable.
 

paul1609

Established Member
Joined
28 Jan 2006
Messages
7,234
Location
Wittersham Kent
3 minutes in one direction, 3.5 in the other. Enough to make a material difference and would essentially wipe out JT gains made by multimillion pound investments in the form of Derby resignalling, Leicester LSI, Market Harborough LSI - and would need a very significant recast to achieve too, going well beyond the scope of the (what should be now) May 21 timetable.
That can't be right surely? a theoretical train that travelled at 125 mph passing Bedford and instantly decelerated to stop at St Pancras would only save 6 mins over a similar 100mph theoretical train. How much of the route is cleared for over 100mph? According to rail miles its a tadge under 50 miles from St Pancras to Bedford.
 

Bald Rick

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Sep 2010
Messages
29,171
That can't be right surely? a theoretical train that travelled at 125 mph passing Bedford and instantly decelerated to stop at St Pancras would only save 6 mins over a similar 100mph theoretical train. How much of the route is cleared for over 100mph? According to rail miles its a tadge under 50 miles from St Pancras to Bedford.

It’s right, but around 2 minutes of it is north of Luton, and there’s very few GTR trains on the fasts north of there. The linespeed goes to over 100mph just north of Cricklewood at 5m30, only dips back below 100 around Luton, and then is at 120 or 125 from Leagrave to Bedford.
 

paul1609

Established Member
Joined
28 Jan 2006
Messages
7,234
Location
Wittersham Kent
It’s right, but around 2 minutes of it is north of Luton, and there’s very few GTR trains on the fasts north of there. The linespeed goes to over 100mph just north of Cricklewood at 5m30, only dips back below 100 around Luton, and then is at 120 or 125 from Leagrave to Bedford.
Bedford to Luton is a tadge under 20 miles. If you assume 125 through Bedford and Luton stations no restrictions in between the maximum time saving is 3 m 24 secs. vice 100 mph max I got the impression the line was a lot slower than that on my admittedly rare excursions.
 

Top