ABB125
Established Member
"Graylinged" is rather more politically convenient though. And it's much less if a mouthful to type!In truth this and other schemes got “Network Rail GWR 500% electrification costoveruned" rather than "Grayinged"
"Graylinged" is rather more politically convenient though. And it's much less if a mouthful to type!In truth this and other schemes got “Network Rail GWR 500% electrification costoveruned" rather than "Grayinged"
Feeder from where - I can’t see any nearby power lines or substations on Google maps??I can't say how detailed or serious it was but I've seen a plan of the Dore West Junction area showing a feeder station to the north of that junction.
Might be a TSC or SATS @Killingworth had seen. Would make sense to have sectioning arrangements there, but a feeder station is unlikely.Feeder from where - I can’t see any nearby power lines or substations on Google maps??
Based on nothing better than the OS map, several Grid lines converge at a site just east of Chesterfield, one of which runs alongside the A617 towards the town but disappears (presumably underground) just before the railway. So my guess would be a feeder just south of Chesterfield station.
Chesterfield is a NG 275kV bulk supply point so a potentially suitable connection point but a few miles from the railway though. The beauty of the Midlands is with the plethora of Coal Fire Power stations built in the 60's and 70's there is a very dense 275/400kV system across the area so plenty of connection points are on offer. However, given its unlikley to have the traffic density of WCML/ECML the load demands may be suitable for connection at lower voltages using SFCs which could provide a quicker connection time.Based on nothing better than the OS map, several Grid lines converge at a site just east of Chesterfield, one of which runs alongside the A617 towards the town but disappears (presumably underground) just before the railway. So my guess would be a feeder just south of Chesterfield station.
With HS2 on top the load would be quite high wouldn‘t it?However, given its unlikley to have the traffic density of WCML/ECML the load demands may be suitable for connection at lower voltages using SFCs which could provide a quicker connection time.
In that case I apologise to Killingworth!Underground 275kV cable to Jordansthorpe substation a couple of km due east of Dore and Totley would make the most sense for Killingworth saw
There was a site marked around Dore a while ago. I work for the regional DNO and we usually get National Grid plans but I can’t for the life of me find it.With HS2 on top the load would be quite high wouldn‘t it?
In that case I apologise to Killingworth!
Would it make sense to have the feed at Dore so it could provide a separate feed to a later electrification of the Hope Valley?
Fair point so lets hope they are future proofing the connections as its cost 5-10% more to double the MVA connection rating of supergrid transformers now as opposed to having to reinforce it in the future. Also with the lead time on getting grid connections being driven by outage availability on the NG as well as acquiring land can also take time if it has to be through compulsory purchase order.With HS2 on top the load would be quite high wouldn‘t it?
Steelmaking in Sheffield/Rotherham has left a legacy of old and underused Grid substations next to railway track:Unlikely to happen, but at Meadowhall the National Grid to Northern Powergrid Wincobank substation has 275kV available.
Has the missing pile been driven in adjacent to the Fasts south of the bridge at Glendon, @Flying Phil?The work on the Braybrooke substation has started. Ground has been cleared and some trenches have been dug.
View attachment 99511
There is no sign of any other work North of Kettering(Glendon Junction). The masts in that area, on the west MML side, still have no "bits" dangling.
View attachment 99512
Are they electrifying these lines as well? The other ones are already electrified.Here is a Pic to the South of the bridge
View attachment 99513
Yes, the last couple of months of this discussion are about extending from these “fast lines” as far as Market Harborough. The very latest news covers extending northwards from Market Harborough.Are they electrifying these lines as well? The other ones are already electrified.
That's great news. Since Corby railway station is already electrified like today now, so I guess that Leicester, Derby, Nottingham and Sheffield will be electrified at this point as well. It's just my guess.Yes, the last couple of months of this discussion are about extending from these “fast lines” as far as Market Harborough. The very latest news covers extending northwards from Market Harborough.
Looks like it hasn't gone in yet then. Thought as much - the main piling contractor seem to be working on Carstairs at the same time so they may only be able to do so much at once!Here is a Pic to the South of the bridge
View attachment 99513
Where is the missing pile? I can see the two foremost ones on the western side and 5 or 6 more for the "fast" MML lines in the middle of the four tracks then spans across all four tracks.......Should there be one more on the western side?Looks like it hasn't gone in yet then. Thought as much - the main piling contractor seem to be working on Carstairs at the same time so they may only be able to do so much at once!
There should be one beyond the second structure on the Fasts side looking south - whether it's going next to the DF or UF remains to be seen.Where is the missing pile? I can see the two foremost ones on the western side and 5 or 6 more for the "fast" MML lines in the middle of the four tracks then spans across all four tracks.......Should there be one more on the western side?
It's up to the designer. It can depend on local circumstances and current (no pun intended) thinking. There are changes in fashion.What happens with the OLE when it finishes in non-terminal station? Does it end within the station area or continue to allow for turn backs / over runs.
Also if it’s specially for the MML into Sheffield / Nottingham, do you wire only the platforms that tend to accommodate the MML services, and leaving the bays out? Would seem ludicrous to wire the north bays at Sheffield!
It would make sense to wire all Sheffield station while they were at it, for if ever it goes to South Kirkby and Doncaster. Wiring 3 and 4 though would no doubt cost an extra 30 billion pounds though......It's up to the designer. It can depend on local circumstances and current (no pun intended) thinking. There are changes in fashion.
In the original WCML south electrification, practically every siding was wired. When it was extended to Glasgow, it was much more limited.
When electric services from Liverpool Street towards Cambridge only ran as far as Bishop's Stortford, the wires continued for about an extra mile for no obvious reason.
We'll be wanting to wire South Kirkby to Church Fenton as well for that money!It would make sense to wire all Sheffield station while they were at it, for if ever it goes to South Kirkby and Doncaster. Wiring 3 and 4 though would no doubt cost an extra 30 billion pounds though......
I see. I suppose it depends how collaborative the Hope Valley / MML upgrade teams decide to be. If indeed OLE is considered for the former.It's up to the designer. It can depend on local circumstances and current (no pun intended) thinking. There are changes in fashion.
Certainly being considered, although the three long tunnels make that rather challenging without long blockades and a lot of cash. Bimodes with wired and unwired sections could make an amusing digression that is best parked here! That said the outline HS2 plans seemed to suggest wiring from Dore Station Junction a short way south on the Hope Valley tracks roughly to the stationI see. I suppose it depends how collaborative the Hope Valley / MML upgrade teams decide to be. If indeed OLE is considered for the former.