• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

MML Electrification: progress updates

Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Killingworth

Established Member
Joined
30 May 2018
Messages
4,890
Location
Sheffield
Boris Johnson has now promised electrification through to derby

Wow, I wondered what had brought that on, but no, it wasn't now, it was 5 months ago. Easily said during an election campaign, but still makes good sense.

He needs reminding of what he said, as often as possible, and beyond Derby all the way to Sheffield, connecting to Doncaster and Leeds.

I'd never been to Sheffield before my employer decided that's where I had to go - over 40 years ago. I soon discovered it was in a passenger rail backwater dating back to the 1830s. That's when George Stephenson's locomotives could not have coped with the gradients encountered on the present 'new road' through Bradway Tunnel. A fairly level spur from Rotherham came in 1838. The city was by-passed in 1840 with the 'old road' running from Derby to Leeds via Chesterfield and Rotherham. The Midland's 'new road' finally came 150 years ago in 1870. If only the Great Central route of 1899 had come 50/60 years earlier, but it didn't! When I arrived I found Sheffield was still pushing for HSTs that I'd got used to when travelling to Cardiff and Bristol. The isolation seems likely to continue with HS2 being on a new spur into Sheffield, if it ever happens!

Midland electrification could be of more benefit to more of us more quickly in the East Midlands than HS2 - and might become a consolation prize for HS2 East being deferred indefinitely!
 

GRALISTAIR

Established Member
Joined
11 Apr 2012
Messages
7,897
Location
Dalton GA USA & Preston Lancs
Midland electrification could be of more benefit to more of us more quickly in the East Midlands than HS2 - and might become a consolation prize for HS2 East being deferred indefinitely!

Yes. The mind boggles. Connecting London and Bedford etc with
Sheffield population > 550,000
Leicester population > 330,000
Derby population > 250,000
Notts population > 305,000
using clean very low CO2 transports seems to be a no-brainer. But DafT cant see it. Weird. Needs a real political will to bulldoze it through.
 

Mikey C

Established Member
Joined
11 Feb 2013
Messages
6,853
The MML does seem to have been a low priority down the years, it even lost its station to Eurostar/HS1, and now finds itself shoved out the back like an embarrassing relative :E
 

duffield

Established Member
Joined
31 Jul 2013
Messages
1,358
Location
East Midlands
Yes. The mind boggles. Connecting London and Bedford etc with
Sheffield population > 550,000
Leicester population > 330,000
Derby population > 250,000
Notts population > 305,000
using clean very low CO2 transports seems to be a no-brainer. But DafT cant see it. Weird. Needs a real political will to bulldoze it through.

I think that basically when GWR electrification went way off course, they used it as an *excuse* to say "Oh no, we just can't do electrification in this country, we give up!".
 

cle

Established Member
Joined
17 Nov 2010
Messages
4,033
The MML does seem to have been a low priority down the years, it even lost its station to Eurostar/HS1, and now finds itself shoved out the back like an embarrassing relative :E

The platforms is pretty poor, but I'd say that the past 5 years are making amends. The 125 project, the wires to Corby/MH and additional semi-fasts, Derby untangling - and more four tracking. Hopefully this will continue (Leicester, Dore even might help) - as it's a very important line, and could be further used (Leeds and Manchester services on from Sheffield, or more XC potential)

Under BR, the service was horrendous. 2-3tph tops, into an under-utilized, fume-y, desolate station. With a beautiful, but neglected facade. Nostalgia is a funny thing.

One other point I would say is that the phenomenal success of Thameslink (plus boom of Luton Airport) gobbled up a lot of potential slots.
 

Mikey C

Established Member
Joined
11 Feb 2013
Messages
6,853
The platforms is pretty poor, but I'd say that the past 5 years are making amends. The 125 project, the wires to Corby/MH and additional semi-fasts, Derby untangling - and more four tracking. Hopefully this will continue (Leicester, Dore even might help) - as it's a very important line, and could be further used (Leeds and Manchester services on from Sheffield, or more XC potential)

Under BR, the service was horrendous. 2-3tph tops, into an under-utilized, fume-y, desolate station. With a beautiful, but neglected facade. Nostalgia is a funny thing.

One other point I would say is that the phenomenal success of Thameslink (plus boom of Luton Airport) gobbled up a lot of potential slots.
Yes there are much needed improvement happening, but wiring to Corby does feel a bit akin to wiring the GW to Newbury but not the mainline past Reading, or wiring the WCML to Northampton, but not wiring the mainline past Rugby! Fine for commuter traffic but frustratingly missing out the major cities on the route...
 

Senex

Established Member
Joined
1 Apr 2014
Messages
2,754
Location
York
Yes there are much needed improvement happening, but wiring to Corby does feel a bit akin to wiring the GW to Newbury but not the mainline past Reading, or wiring the WCML to Northampton, but not wiring the mainline past Rugby! Fine for commuter traffic but frustratingly missing out the major cities on the route...
But the only thing a Westminster government and its civil servants is interested in is the commuter traffic — and then only when it's London's.
 

Killingworth

Established Member
Joined
30 May 2018
Messages
4,890
Location
Sheffield
The platforms is pretty poor, but I'd say that the past 5 years are making amends. The 125 project, the wires to Corby/MH and additional semi-fasts, Derby untangling - and more four tracking. Hopefully this will continue (Leicester, Dore even might help) - as it's a very important line, and could be further used (Leeds and Manchester services on from Sheffield, or more XC potential)

Under BR, the service was horrendous. 2-3tph tops, into an under-utilized, fume-y, desolate station. With a beautiful, but neglected facade. Nostalgia is a funny thing.

One other point I would say is that the phenomenal success of Thameslink (plus boom of Luton Airport) gobbled up a lot of potential slots.

The phenomenal success of Thameslink proves that investment in rail can generate new business beyond expectations, as has the M25 with roads.

All's well for Manchester - Sheffield electrification through the Hope Valley, New footbridges are being built at Hathersage and Dore to allow for it. Slightly more to do with Totley, Cowburn and Disley tunnels though.

Let's get MML electrified to Leicester first. That's a big enough ask at present
 

cle

Established Member
Joined
17 Nov 2010
Messages
4,033
Corby is at least the end of a service (soon to be two tph) - Leicester doesn't add anything non-symbolic, as it's not a terminus - nor do we meet wires there. That would be Doncaster! But perhaps an hourly electric stopper to Leicester would be useful, if it had another platform as planned.

Derby or Nottingham are better, as more services are removed from diesel/bi entirely. From there, Sheffield on both routes (and Doncaster) are obvious next moves. Derby to Birmingham after that.
 

GRALISTAIR

Established Member
Joined
11 Apr 2012
Messages
7,897
Location
Dalton GA USA & Preston Lancs
Corby is at least the end of a service (soon to be two tph) - Leicester doesn't add anything non-symbolic, as it's not a terminus - nor do we meet wires there. That would be Doncaster! But perhaps an hourly electric stopper to Leicester would be useful, if it had another platform as planned.

Derby or Nottingham are better, as more services are removed from diesel/bi entirely. From there, Sheffield on both routes (and Doncaster) are obvious next moves. Derby to Birmingham after that.
I do agree that Nottingham and/or Derby would be better but Leicester is also vital for doing F2N for freight in stages too.
 

Killingworth

Established Member
Joined
30 May 2018
Messages
4,890
Location
Sheffield
I do agree that Nottingham and/or Derby would be better but Leicester is also vital for doing F2N for freight in stages too.

Leicester is desired as a step along the way and every step is in the right direction. Every opportunity needs to be grabbed when spotted. All the way if possible, but as much as offers. Derby to meet up with railway works and a possible link to West Coast and Birmingham.
 

59CosG95

Established Member
Joined
18 Aug 2013
Messages
6,495
Location
Between Peterborough & Bedlington
Leicester is desired as a step along the way and every step is in the right direction. Every opportunity needs to be grabbed when spotted. All the way if possible, but as much as offers. Derby to meet up with railway works and a possible link to West Coast and Birmingham.
Wiring Leicester would certainly make more of a case for wiring the East-West corridor to Nuneaton, along with the potential to extend wires to Birmingham via Coleshill. Then of course they could be extended east to Peterborough and East Anglia...
 

cle

Established Member
Joined
17 Nov 2010
Messages
4,033
It's a tragic state of electrification affairs that we are forgiving of these ludicrous 'get to the next station' incrementation extensions. How our standards have plummeted. Begging for Bedwyn, could be the memoir.

Leicester is nothing, in isolation. Yes it's a junction, but diesel in each direction - and no MML trains terminate there. So the case must be pitiful.

F2N needs to hit Nuneation, this does nothing for that. And yes the WCML is wired, but are any freight end points? Not to mention the whole route across to Felixstowe. Leicester to Wigston is probably 0.5% of the route...
 

Bald Rick

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Sep 2010
Messages
29,209
It's a tragic state of electrification affairs that we are forgiving of these ludicrous 'get to the next station' incrementation extensions. How our standards have plummeted. Begging for Bedwyn, could be the memoir.

Leicester is nothing, in isolation. Yes it's a junction, but diesel in each direction - and no MML trains terminate there. So the case must be pitiful.

F2N needs to hit Nuneation, this does nothing for that. And yes the WCML is wired, but are any freight end points? Not to mention the whole route across to Felixstowe. Leicester to Wigston is probably 0.5% of the route...


In principle you are right - Market Harboro’ was only on the cards because of the feeder station issue. The next stage for the MML will be to at least Nottingham, and probably Sheffield as well (via Derby, obviously).

But to make a small correction Wigston - Leicester is around 2 % of Felixstowe - Nuneaton; Leicester to Syston is another 3%, and of course 10% of F2N is already electrified ;)
 

cle

Established Member
Joined
17 Nov 2010
Messages
4,033
In principle you are right - Market Harboro’ was only on the cards because of the feeder station issue. The next stage for the MML will be to at least Nottingham, and probably Sheffield as well (via Derby, obviously).

But to make a small correction Wigston - Leicester is around 2 % of Felixstowe - Nuneaton; Leicester to Syston is another 3%, and of course 10% of F2N is already electrified ;)
I'm depressed that my facetious remark was actually so close.

We need a nationalized electrification programme - like an actual industry, run centrally with various regional teams and continuous upskiling/re-training, procurement at scale etc, with a 20 year plan.
 

Bald Rick

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Sep 2010
Messages
29,209
I'm depressed that my facetious remark was actually so close.

We need a nationalized electrification programme - like an actual industry, run centrally with various regional teams and continuous upskiling/re-training, procurement at scale etc, with a 20 year plan.

I would say national rather than nationalised, but yes, I agree. Although we do have one, it’s just in Scotland.
 

londonmidland

Established Member
Joined
22 Dec 2009
Messages
1,833
Location
Leicester
So after the current electrification project is complete, how long until the next one starts to extend it northwards? Also, do we even know if the wires will reach Market Harborough yet? There's been very little information regarding that recently.

I can't help think that once this project is complete, it'll be a number of years until the next one starts, inching the wires northwards. Electrification should have ended at Nottingham and/or Derby for the time being in my opinion.
 

59CosG95

Established Member
Joined
18 Aug 2013
Messages
6,495
Location
Between Peterborough & Bedlington
So after the current electrification project is complete, how long until the next one starts to extend it northwards? Also, do we even know if the wires will reach Market Harborough yet? There's been very little information regarding that recently.

I can't help think that once this project is complete, it'll be a number of years until the next one starts, inching the wires northwards. Electrification should have ended at Nottingham and/or Derby for the time being in my opinion.
Authority has been given by the DfT to NR (and the current design team for MMLE) to give detailed designs for the extension to Mkt Harboro'; once the scope has been agreed, and a TWAO issued, construction begins (IIRC). A specialist groundwork contractor recently took lineside soil samples for the route north of Kettering, so one can safely assume that these samples will help form the basis for the layout/locations of OLE structure foundations.

No idea when the project will continue northwards; ISTR that the scope for the Leicester Area Remodelling still needs to be agreed (as it would be more cost-effective & sensible to design any OLE infrastructure around proposed changes as they happen, as far as is possible). I agree that wires should have gone onwards to Notts & Derby, but we are where we are.
 

adamedwards

Member
Joined
4 Apr 2016
Messages
796
On the plus side, doing this incrementally may be better than a Grand Project which gets cancelled. One might hope that by the time this wiring gets going, keeping the teams moving on after Corby is done (and St Pancras to Bedford made fit for 125mph electrics), Leicester will be on the cards. As the line north from Market Harborough is fairly basic to Wigston Junction that might happen, as the Bimodes can switch on the move.
 

Bald Rick

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Sep 2010
Messages
29,209
Authority has been given by the DfT to NR (and the current design team for MMLE) to give detailed designs for the extension to Mkt Harboro'; once the scope has been agreed, and a TWAO issued, construction begins (IIRC). A specialist groundwork contractor recently took lineside soil samples for the route north of Kettering, so one can safely assume that these samples will help form the basis for the layout/locations of OLE structure foundations.

No idea when the project will continue northwards; ISTR that the scope for the Leicester Area Remodelling still needs to be agreed (as it would be more cost-effective & sensible to design any OLE infrastructure around proposed changes as they happen, as far as is possible). I agree that wires should have gone onwards to Notts & Derby, but we are where we are.

Not sure a TWAO is required. It wasn’t for electrification to Corby. What would that be for?
 

Brissle Girl

Established Member
Joined
17 Jul 2018
Messages
2,658
Presumably, given that substations are a fairly significant part of the cost, once the Braybrooke one is up and running, any further extension north towards Leicester would be relatively cheap until there is a need to site the next one along. So, as an example, NR could make a case to continue to Leicester (or more likely just south) to give a short period of continuity to the electrification team whilst a wider review of the strategy for the MML is completed. (That does presume that there is indeed any serious intention to review the current policy to stop at MH - if the govt is still adamant then there would be little point.)
 

Top