clagmonster
Established Member
- Joined
- 8 Jun 2005
- Messages
- 2,442
Whilst clearly not the intended use of the ticket, would walking from Victoria to Blackfriars be a valid non Underground interchange?
How many ordinary punters would think a NOT UNDERGROUND ticket would be valid on a route which necessitates taking the Underground to complete the rail journey?
Precisely non.
What about my neice who would rather die than travel on an Underground train after a nasty experience many years ago? Then there's the people who would rather take a bus or two, or take a boris bike, or even walk - it's really not that far.
There is NOTHING that compels people to use the Underground for cross London journeys, otherwise there might be issues at night, to say nothing of what happens whenthose nasty unions decide to closethe Underground is on strike.
What about my neice who would rather die than travel on an Underground train after a nasty experience many years ago? Then there's the people who would rather take a bus or two, or take a boris bike, or even walk - it's really not that far.
There is NOTHING that compels people to use the Underground for cross London journeys, otherwise there might be issues at night, to say nothing of what happens whenthose nasty unions decide to closethe Underground is on strike.
By that logic an Inverness to Edinburgh ticket routed VTEC ONLY is not valid to start short at Aberdeen and travel from Aberdeen to Edinburgh (on a VTEC service), because you can't make the entire journey from Inverness on a VTEC train. But the general consensus has always been that it's valid to start short like that.The point Clip was making, and I agree with him, is that if a given ticket has a specific route restriction, the only routes that make sense to be permitted are those where you can (whether you actually will or not, subject to BoJ being permitted) complete the whole journey without breaching the route restriction.
The point Clip was making...
...
I'm not being an apologist for using a NOT UNDERGROUND ticket to St Pancras via Victoria, far from it (I think it's pushing things too far and would never try it myself), but I do find that most arguments against it tend to fall down when subjected to pedantic analysis.
Would you like to volunteer as a test case?
By that logic an Inverness to Edinburgh ticket routed VTEC ONLY is not valid to start short at Aberdeen and travel from Aberdeen to Edinburgh (on a VTEC service), because you can't make the entire journey from Inverness on a VTEC train. But the general consensus has always been that it's valid to start short like that.
I'm happy to arrive at Victoria with such a ticket.
I really can't see it going off route provided you don't use the underground. And I also believe you can cut your journey short.
So by your logic a Birmingham to London ticket routed VIA HIGH WYCOMBE is fine to use as far as Saunderton, as long as you get off and either finish short or get a taxi to Beaconsfield, where you can then carry on to Marylebone.
It's just laughable.
Now obviously it's not a likely scenario, but say you needed to visit someone in/near Saunderton and another person in/near Beaconsfield. The first person also wants to see the second and thus offers you a lift between the two. Are you really saying that the ticket you held would not be valid just because you miss a chunk of the journey that happens to include the via point?
I'm clearly missing something here. Saunderton - High Wycombe - Beaconsfield. Three consecutive stations on the same line.
Why wouldn't that be ok? As long as the ticket is valid for BOJ then you are using it in two stages. If you always have to go through the via point then effectively true break of journey can't apply other than at the break point. A break at any other point would mean you wouldn't go through the via point on that segment.
Now obviously it's not a likely scenario, but say you needed to visit someone in/near Saunderton and another person in/near Beaconsfield. The first person also wants to see the second and thus offers you a lift between the two. Are you really saying that the ticket you held would not be valid just because you miss a chunk of the journey that happens to include the via point?
I'm clearly missing something here. Saunderton - High Wycombe - Beaconsfield. Three consecutive stations on the same line.
Why wouldn't that be ok? As long as the ticket is valid for BOJ then you are using it in two stages. If you always have to go through the via point then effectively true break of journey can't apply other than at the break point. A break at any other point would mean you wouldn't go through the via point on that segment.
Now obviously it's not a likely scenario, but say you needed to visit someone in/near Saunderton and another person in/near Beaconsfield. The first person also wants to see the second and thus offers you a lift between the two. Are you really saying that the ticket you held would not be valid just because you miss a chunk of the journey that happens to include the via point?
Please lets keep this one respectful. I'll have to have a look at the mapped routes in the routing guide for say a Brighton to St Pancras Route Not Understand ticket. But I think I would be reasonable to arrive at Victoria and walk to say Blackfriars and continue to St Pancras if you so wished.
I have used a NOT UNDERGROUND season ticket at Victoria a handful of times in the past (not recently). I believe to to be valid because the electronic Routeing guide contains several ways of connecting between certain stations, of which Tube is only one of them. You can see this information in the Fixed Links section of the Station Info for London Victoria on BR times.com .
During the middle of the night Tube isn't offered. Instead there is 'transfer' which means you make your own way at your own cost. Journey planners will produce itineraries for this, and for many other walking interchanges such as Newark Castle to Newark Northgate that are in the database. This is not the case for Saunderton which has no fixed links defined. Thus it is a valid itinerary and is valid if your ticket permits starting short.
That said I do NOT recommend this. I got delayed at the gateline by staff who hadn't even heard of the Routeing guide and missed my intended train.
One other gotcha is the grey area about whether a journey can start of end with a walk. I got my ticket issued with an origin further north than St Pancras so it clearly had an NR leg at both ends to solve this.
I have missed trains before due to discussions on ticket validity. Not at Victoira though.Yes but as usual with GTR gatelines, when passengers are forced to pay more, they refund the money on demand. Also if a passenger is wanting to exit a gateline with such a ticket, the staff cannot hold you there forever.
Also, I believe GTR has made all their RPIs become OBS so I fall to see what the staff at the gateline could do.
As have I.I have missed trains before due to discussions on ticket validity. Not at Victoira though.