AlterEgo
Veteran Member
Just because something is not currently explain by science does not mean it can't or won't be in the future. Indeed science is just the name for our observations based on evidence. Thus even if things like consciousness do end up being related to phenomena we describe as "spiritual" in the present, we will then have evidence and thus that explanation will be science.
But that's pretty much exactly what I said, isn't it?
So for me, in terms of consciousnesses and the like, my opinion is that it is simply a thing we do not yet understand, similar to how we didn't understand the development of some illnesses in the past, and that by continued research, observations, experiments, fact gathering and checking, we will eventually gather and understanding of it.
Indeed, but consciousness and spirituality are not areas where science has made much of an impact so far. It seems reasonable to suppose that one day, science might get there. But until then, it seems most reasonable to keep an open mind about the nature of consciousness and being, rather than discounting the idea of a deity from the outset. This would strike me as in fact the most scientific approach you can take; there is good evidence for neither supposition, so it is best to mark the question as unresolved until further notice.