gray1404
Established Member
Sadly it can work the other way. I was once travelling from Milton Keynes Central to Liverpool on a WMT Advance. Problems with WMT meant that my train was cancelled and if I was told by WMT staff that I had to go as far as possible on WMT (i.e. to Crewe) and from there I'd have to ask the station staff to arrange a taxi for me - as it was clear that by the time I'd get to Crewe with WMT there would be no more services to Liverpool with any TOC. I thought this was stupid advice given it was still possible to complete the entire journey by train if I was able to use Virgin Trains. Thankfully a word with VT platform staff resulted in the train manager of the next VT allowing me to travel to Crewe and I was able to get a connection to complete my journey.
I understand that during disruption you have to stick to the routing or TOC of your ticket (and it doesn't become an Any Permitted all of a sudden). However, I do have a limit whereby I will not accept bad advise if it is going to leave me stranded. I am of the view that it is better to complete a journey by train if possible then end up having to be at the mercy of a TOC provided taxi.
As it also happened in the above situation I had a separate ticket for onaward travel with Merseyrail.
Thoughts please.....
If a passenger has a ticket that is restricted to a certain TOC but delays/cancellations/disruption occurs, surely it is bad advise to be told to travel as far as possible with that TOC if that will be you won't make it to your final destination before the last train of the day?
Surely if other TOCs services are still running it is better to make use of those services to get to one's destination rather then knowingly leave a passenger stranded? I have been refused taxi's in the past to my final destination when I have been entitled to one, moreover when using split tickets, and the above strategy puts a passenger in a situation whereby by have to rely on being provided with a taxi? Surely this is best avoided if possible.....