• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

New 8,400 mile route will link London to Tokyo via train

Status
Not open for further replies.

PudseyBearHST

Member
Joined
28 Sep 2015
Messages
972
Location
South West
Apologies if this is already being discussed on another thread but I saw this on the news today:

"Passengers might soon be able to travel from London to Tokyo on the Trans-Siberian railway via an 8,400 mile route, in an ambitious proposal by the Russian government.

The project would involve constructing a 28-mile bridge that would allow trains to cross the East Sea.

Beginning in London, the train would take travellers through the heart of Russia before concluding in Wakkanai, Japan.

The proposal is being described as a “bridge across history” due to Moscow and Tokyo failing to ever reach a treaty agreement, ending the antagonisms following World War II.

The trip is one of great topographic value, with trains passing through Germany and Poland before entering Eastern Europe.

Passengers would also pass through the Siberian Mountains before reaching the proposed bridge, a blueprint for the route shows.

Reportedly keen to boost investment in the eastern parts of Russia, Putin is in serious talks with Japanese officials to kickstart plans.

The Russian president’s environmental aid, Sergei Ivanov, has said that a link between Japan and Sakhalin – Russia’s largest island which was half controlled by Tokyo before WWII – was a “long held dream” and would hugely benefit oil and gas production in the country.

"We are seriously offering Japanese partners to consider the construction of a mixed road and railway passage from Hokkaido to southern part of Sakhalin," explained Russia's first vice-premier Igor Shuvalov, the Siberian Times reports.

The plans were revealed at Russia’s Eastern Economic Forum, hosted by Putin in Vladivostok.

Currently, travellers can take the Trans-Siberian railway from Beijing through Mongolia and onto Moscow, arriving in the Russian capital in as little as 15 days.

It’s a route that’s proven hugely popular amongst eager wanderlusts and gap year students. "

Source: http://www.msn.com/en-gb/lifestyle/...-train/ar-AAruVIr?li=BBoPWjQ&ocid=mailsignout
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

matt_world2004

Established Member
Joined
5 Nov 2014
Messages
4,504
I imagine that it would not be a direct route to japan . with a few changed required.
 

168lover

Member
Joined
2 Aug 2013
Messages
588
Location
Chiltern Mailine Land
Could imagine the announcements at Tokyo 'Apologies to the delay to this service, this owing to a delayed Southern service in front of us on departure from London, many days ago. Some say the southern train hasn't even left London yet...'
 

cjmillsnun

Established Member
Joined
13 Feb 2011
Messages
3,254
Doesn't Russia use a different track gauge? In which case, I'd agree with Matt.
 

AlexNL

Established Member
Joined
19 Dec 2014
Messages
1,683
Russia indeed uses a different gauge. While inconvenient, it's not an insurmountable problem as gauge changing equipment has existed for decades and is being used daily, for example in Spain.
 

fowler9

Established Member
Joined
29 Oct 2013
Messages
8,367
Location
Liverpool
After taking a bus in Cama Class from Santa Cruz De La Sierra in Bolivia to Buenos Aires in Argentina I think I would just get the plane. This was a modern Mercedes bus. I would rather have my eyes gouged by one of the dodgier residents of Retiro bus station than do it again over a day and a half. Ha ha. Seriously on a journey like that the majestic plains soon become incredibly boring.
 
Last edited:

Chris999999

Member
Joined
22 Jun 2010
Messages
238
It wasn't so long ago that there was a proposal to build a tunnel under the Bering Strait, so that you could travel by train from London via Russia to New York.

This seems a bit of an anticlimax really.
 

jingsmonty

Member
Joined
21 Oct 2014
Messages
1,022
Location
Inverness
Doesn't Russia use a different track gauge? In which case, I'd agree with Matt.

Spain already used variable guage rolling stock, I believe...think it's called 'Talgo'?

Nice idea, as long as it's not a 2 car 158 with no catering trolley...
 

LNW-GW Joint

Veteran Member
Joined
22 Feb 2011
Messages
19,678
Location
Mold, Clwyd
Spain already used variable guage rolling stock, I believe...think it's called 'Talgo'?

Many Spanish train types use dual-gauge technology, and there are automatic gauge-changers at strategic points on the standard gauge AV network (run through at 30km/h).
Talgo are one manufacturer, but CAF also has a dual-gauge bogie design. http://www.vialibre-ffe.com/pdf/Track_gauge_changeover.pdf
Alstom and Bombardier have supplied trains to RENFE with this technology, as well as Talgo and CAF themselves (including tilting and bi-mode variants).
Of course, you need a special design of rolling stock, and there are performance penalties (eg 250km/h max speed) compared to single-gauge stock.

Talgo has installed an automatic system at Brest on the Poland-Belarus border, intended for the Berlin-Moscow service.
http://www.railwaygazette.com/news/...anger-installed-at-belarus-poland-border.html
 
Last edited:

axlecounter

Member
Joined
23 Feb 2016
Messages
403
Location
Switzerland
On such a long run I don't believe anything "automatic" (=expensive) would be considered. More probably the good ol' way: traditional coaches and bogies replacement at the border.
 

Taunton

Established Member
Joined
1 Aug 2013
Messages
10,087
Bridging from Japan to Sakhalin will not give a through route from London to Tokyo.

Sakhalin itself is an island and there is no onward connection to the Russian mainland. There is a rail network on the island, which has the characteristics of a country branch line, but, uniquely for Russia, it is 3'6" gauge. There is a proposed conversion project to Russian 5' gauge, which will then make it incompatible with the Japanese network across any proposed bridge, which remains 3'6".
 

MarkyT

Established Member
Joined
20 May 2012
Messages
6,250
Location
Torbay
Bridging from Japan to Sakhalin will not give a through route from London to Tokyo.

Sakhalin itself is an island and there is no onward connection to the Russian mainland. There is a rail network on the island, which has the characteristics of a country branch line, but, uniquely for Russia, it is 3'6" gauge. There is a proposed conversion project to Russian 5' gauge, which will then make it incompatible with the Japanese network across any proposed bridge, which remains 3'6".

I read gauge conversion is already underway and some dual gauge trackage is in place. There is a train ferry which presumably allows mainland wagons to access industry on Sakhalin. The 3ft 6in gauge on the island arises from former Japanese occupation of the south part of the island (until WW2). Japan also has European standard gauge, mainly for their Shinkansen high speed services. The Shinkansen network finally reached Hokkaido (the nearest Japanese territory to Sakhalin) in 2016 through the mixed gauge Seikan tunnel, and further extensions of the standard gauge new line on the island are planned.
 

Adlington

Member
Joined
3 Oct 2016
Messages
1,040
The 3ft 6in gauge on the [Sakhalin] island arises from former Japanese occupation of the south part of the island (until WW2).
Sakhalin was fought over by Russia and Japan at various times in history. In accordance with the Treaty of Portsmouth of 1905, the southern part of the island below the 50th parallel north reverted to Japan, while Russia retained the northern three-fifths.

So the reference to "Japanese occupation" is misleading, to put it politely.
 

MarkyT

Established Member
Joined
20 May 2012
Messages
6,250
Location
Torbay
Sakhalin was fought over by Russia and Japan at various times in history. In accordance with the Treaty of Portsmouth of 1905, the southern part of the island below the 50th parallel north reverted to Japan, while Russia retained the northern three-fifths.

So the reference to "Japanese occupation" is misleading, to put it politely.

Thanks for the clarification. Apologies if the term caused any offence to anyone. I understand there is still some sensitivity in the area today over control of a number of smaller islands further to the east.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top