• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

New Velaro D sets

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Snapper

Established Member
Joined
28 May 2006
Messages
2,391
Location
All over the place
Channel Tunnel here we come

Maybe, maybe not. I asked that question of DBs Dr Volker Kefer at the unveiling. He confirmed that operating through the tunnel is 'an ambition' but the Velaro is too short.


The rules on operating trains through the tunnel have changed but not the one that says they have to be at least 387m long. The Velaro is only 200m
 
Last edited:

j0hn0

Member
Joined
20 Jan 2009
Messages
563
Location
St Albans, England
They have been lobbying for ages about this and the safety rules are currently under review.

Considering the amount of incidents in the tunnel that have never lead to this scenario, or indeed the fact that the scenario of the train being split isn't actually the safest option, I alluded to the fact that this requirement was part of the Eurostar agreement for them to be exclusive channel operators and guarantee a return on investment.

Even if the long train rules still applied, they can run in multiple, simples :D
 

Snapper

Established Member
Joined
28 May 2006
Messages
2,391
Location
All over the place
The safety rules HAVE been reviewed.

Some stuff has been dropped - such as the needs for seperate power cars and the ability to split the train - but running two Velaros together would affect the economics of the service - and DB have no intention of running it just to lose money.
 

j0hn0

Member
Joined
20 Jan 2009
Messages
563
Location
St Albans, England
The safety rules HAVE been reviewed.

Some stuff has been dropped - such as the needs for seperate power cars and the ability to split the train - but running two Velaros together would affect the economics of the service - and DB have no intention of running it just to lose money.

cool, so they're your photos I found, sweet. Really top work with all of them. So it looks like an all clear for through the tunnel then! :)

Sure they wouldn't want to lose money, however, if as Gordon says, an ICE from Frankfurt joining an ICE from Amsterdam at brussels would probably make the money.

I guess it would depend where they pick people up from and how they would do the security stuff because for Eurostar you have to go through the baggage scanning.

Every Eurostar I have been on from Brussels has been packed to the rafters, if there is another service added to that pattern, perhaps they might need to add the second one anyway

But i am no economics expert :)
 

Snapper

Established Member
Joined
28 May 2006
Messages
2,391
Location
All over the place
The idea of joining two services isn't a bad one and may be the answer to the problem. However, there is another possibility. Siemens confirmed that Eurostar tendered for new trains last year.

Now, if these were ordered, it wouldn't be difficult for DB to tack on to that order and get trains that can run through the tunnel as the rules stand now.

Once again - it's all down to the economics.
 

odol

Member
Joined
22 Feb 2009
Messages
47
Location
Poland/Scotland
Does anybody knows why the max speed is 320 km/h not 350 km/h?
Its four-system, so under what voltage that can be used?
 

gordonthemoron

Established Member
Joined
4 Sep 2006
Messages
6,594
Location
Milton Keynes
If current (eurostar) trains have to be 387m long to use the channel tunnel, what about thr North of London sets which are somewhat shorter?

Saw a load of the North of London sets in Paris on Friday
 

j0hn0

Member
Joined
20 Jan 2009
Messages
563
Location
St Albans, England
saw a picure of one stabled in Paris recently with its SNCF sticker on the side.

Watching youtube videos of them on the ECML, they certainly look as if they are right within the limits of the loading gauge, the power cars look really bulky, nice :)
 

gordonthemoron

Established Member
Joined
4 Sep 2006
Messages
6,594
Location
Milton Keynes
They're much nicer than a Pendo, more space, more leg room, bigger windows, nicer (reclining) seats, better buffet/restaurant which is available for all passengers at reasonable prices.

I'm off on the not so wonderful ICE-T to Berlin tomorrow
 
Joined
2 Jun 2009
Messages
1,135
Location
North London
I'd like to see DB ICEs running from St Pancras to Cologne or beyond. And it now looks like that's technically possible.

The stumbling block now is finding a way to run a German service, so it meets the requirements of UK immigration & customs. I'd like to see them revert to onboard checks, instead of the nonsense you have to endure at Brussels or Paris.
 
Last edited:

jopsuk

Veteran Member
Joined
13 May 2008
Messages
12,773
Even better would be if we were to grow up (as a country) and join the Schengen zone...
 
Joined
2 Jun 2009
Messages
1,135
Location
North London
Even better would be if we were to grow up (as a country) and join the Schengen zone...

How true. The farce is brought into sharp relief at Paris Nord. You can casually board a Thalys for an international trip to Brussels. But the procedure for the Eurostar for London is like being checked in for a flight to or from North Korea.

Of course, security could be maintained. Just adopt the procedure they have at Spanish stations for boarding AVE trains.
 
Joined
2 Jun 2009
Messages
1,135
Location
North London
What is that?

At Spanish stations, they have luggage x-ray machines. Prior to boarding a long distance train, your luggage is either checked on the platform or at ticket control. It's pretty efficient and you can normally arrive 5 mins before depature and still clear the luggage check in time for your train.

From my experience, seems to work well enough.
 

EWS 58038

Member
Joined
7 Apr 2008
Messages
356
Location
Almere (Greater Amsterdam)
Border control is not an issue as long as it's done at the arrival destination like Ashford or London St. pancras. The UK is creating this mess, so they should deal with it IMO.

As for Velaro D sets, these can be used on cross channel services with limited modifications. More about this issue can be found in this months Modern railways.
 

Snapper

Established Member
Joined
28 May 2006
Messages
2,391
Location
All over the place
As for Velaro D sets, these can be used on cross channel services with limited modifications. More about this issue can be found in this months Modern railways.

That's not actually true. The Velaro D sets comply with some of the rules (now that they've been relaxed) - but they are still too short. It is speculated that this rule would be satisfied if two sets worked through the tunnel together, but I've not seen this confirmed by anyone in the know.

They do look good though:

http://www.paulbigland.fotopic.net/c1842814.html
 

j0hn0

Member
Joined
20 Jan 2009
Messages
563
Location
St Albans, England
That's not actually true. The Velaro D sets comply with some of the rules (now that they've been relaxed) - but they are still too short. It is speculated that this rule would be satisfied if two sets worked through the tunnel together, but I've not seen this confirmed by anyone in the know.

They do look good though:

http://www.paulbigland.fotopic.net/c1842814.html

Apparently the length rule and the requirement to split the train has been relaxed which means that I guess the only requirements now relate to operational ability and fire risk
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top