• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Nicola Sturgeon to resign as First Minister of Scotland, Humza Yousaf elected as new First Minister.

Status
Not open for further replies.

birchesgreen

Established Member
Joined
16 Jun 2020
Messages
5,722
Location
Birmingham
Well it got the guy in the papers, he can now recount how he fought against woke to fellow pub bores for ever more.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

duncanp

Established Member
Joined
16 Aug 2012
Messages
4,856
It absolutely is the silly response.
If you aren't pregnant, either because you are male and so can't get pregnant, or are female and aren't pregnant, then the answer to the question of "are you pregnant" is "no". Absolutely zero need to make a mountain out of that molehill.

But there is also no need for the Blood Transfusion Service to refuse his donation when they can quite clearly see that he is a (biological) man and therefore it is physically impossible for him to become pregnant.
 

McRhu

Member
Joined
14 Oct 2015
Messages
533
Location
Lanark
<Self deleted my post. I stand by what I said, but have no wish to cause unnecessary offence or derail the thread.>
 
Last edited:

Falcon1200

Established Member
Joined
14 Jun 2021
Messages
4,323
Location
Neilston, East Renfrewshire
Can’t agree that the question, addressed to a man was in any way sensible.

I agree that it is a silly question, which I have to answer each time I give blood (on the form sent to me in advance); But it is not worth making a fuss about, and so depriving the Transfusion Service of much-needed blood.
 

Cowley

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
15 Apr 2016
Messages
16,622
Location
Devon
Report it to the mods using the report link and they will delete it. Optionally, if you want it removed quicker, edit it down to "delete please" or something then report it.

Yep that would do it. :)

Right. The NHS Scotland stuff really doesn’t belong in this thread, so let’s leave it at that (unless you really want to start a new thread on it).

Back on topic please.
 

brad465

Established Member
Joined
11 Aug 2010
Messages
7,841
Location
Taunton or Kent
SNP Treasurer now been arrested:


SNP treasurer Colin Beattie has been arrested by police investigating the party's finances.
Mr Beattie, 71, has been taken into custody and is being questioned by Police Scotland detectives.
A spokesman for the force said the arrest was made in connection with the ongoing investigation into the funding and finances of the SNP.
He said a report will be sent to the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service.
Mr Beattie is the MSP for the Midlothian North and Musselburgh constituency. He served as the SNP's treasurer for 16 years before being defeated in an internal election by Douglas Chapman in 2020, but returned to the role when Mr Chapman resigned a year later.
It comes two weeks after Peter Murrell, the SNP's former chief executive who is married to Nicola Sturgeon, was also arrested by officers who searched his home in Glasgow and the party's headquarters in Edinburgh.
Mr Murrell was later released without charge.
This breaking news story is being updated and more details will be published shortly. Please refresh the page for the fullest version.
 

Butts

Veteran Member
Joined
16 Jan 2011
Messages
11,501
Location
Stirlingshire
Time for a "Where did it all go wrong for the SNP" thread to join their contemporary parties ones ?

Absolute power corrupts goes the old adage which certainly seems to being borne out as the SNP enters the realms of hari kari :!:
 

brad465

Established Member
Joined
11 Aug 2010
Messages
7,841
Location
Taunton or Kent
Time for a "Where did it all go wrong for the SNP" thread to join their contemporary parties ones ?

Absolute power corrupts goes the old adage which certainly seems to being borne out as the SNP enters the realms of hari kari :!:
There was a thread about "when" it will all go wrong, however this thread superseded it when Sturgeon resigned.
 

tbtc

Veteran Member
Joined
16 Dec 2008
Messages
17,882
Location
Reston City Centre
It feels inevitable- if you create a cult of leadership where nobody is allowed to criticise the Dear Leader, you maintain strong internal discipline so that people daren’t dissent, you brand anyone not entirely on board with your project as a “Tory” or claim that they must somehow “hate Scotland” or are “taking Scotland down” etc then you’ll have a formidable party in the short term but once the bubble bursts then the bunker mentality stops working

We saw that 48% of SNP members were against the status-quo candidate. I think that, if the third of the membership who left recently had remained then we’d have seen a majority want change (although some will have left due to personal finances/ death, i feel that most people leaving will have lost faith in the brand of Sturgeonism that the independence campaign had turned into)

I remember the days when the SNP were happy to disagree with each other, they campaigned on independence only, remember the 1990s “Vote For Us And We’ll Resign” adverts (where they said that they’d secure independence and then step aside so Scots could vote for whichever party they wanted in an independent Scotland.., so you didn’t have to agree with Salmond etc on everything, the SNP were just a means to an end)? So you could have the likes of Cherry and Yousef under the same umbrella, because the SNP represented a diverse range of people who all agreed that Scotland shots be independent even if they agreed on little else.

I know Blair wasn’t perfect but even in the zeal of “on message” MPs ruled by Campbell/ Mandelson, Labour tolerated Back bench dissent from the likes of Corbyn - but the SNP wouldn’t tolerate voices not fully signed up to their agenda

In hindsight They seemed to squander the momentum of getting 45% in the 2014 referendum by focusing on “traitors” Rather than “converts”, maybe hoping that enthusiastic teenagers would outnumber disillusioned older voters who’d lost the faith (which is why a lot of SNP priorities seem to be focused on things that matters to teenagers, reducing the age of things like voting, gender reform, recycling)?
 

Broucek

Member
Joined
13 Aug 2020
Messages
558
Location
UK
It feels inevitable- if you create a cult of leadership where nobody is allowed to criticise the Dear Leader, you maintain strong internal discipline so that people daren’t dissent, you brand anyone not entirely on board with your project as a “Tory” or claim that they must somehow “hate Scotland” or are “taking Scotland down” etc then you’ll have a formidable party in the short term but once the bubble bursts then the bunker mentality stops working

We saw that 48% of SNP members were against the status-quo candidate. I think that, if the third of the membership who left recently had remained then we’d have seen a majority want change (although some will have left due to personal finances/ death, i feel that most people leaving will have lost faith in the brand of Sturgeonism that the independence campaign had turned into)

I remember the days when the SNP were happy to disagree with each other, they campaigned on independence only, remember the 1990s “Vote For Us And We’ll Resign” adverts (where they said that they’d secure independence and then step aside so Scots could vote for whichever party they wanted in an independent Scotland.., so you didn’t have to agree with Salmond etc on everything, the SNP were just a means to an end)? So you could have the likes of Cherry and Yousef under the same umbrella, because the SNP represented a diverse range of people who all agreed that Scotland shots be independent even if they agreed on little else.

I know Blair wasn’t perfect but even in the zeal of “on message” MPs ruled by Campbell/ Mandelson, Labour tolerated Back bench dissent from the likes of Corbyn - but the SNP wouldn’t tolerate voices not fully signed up to their agenda

In hindsight They seemed to squander the momentum of getting 45% in the 2014 referendum by focusing on “traitors” Rather than “converts”, maybe hoping that enthusiastic teenagers would outnumber disillusioned older voters who’d lost the faith (which is why a lot of SNP priorities seem to be focused on things that matters to teenagers, reducing the age of things like voting, gender reform, recycling)?
It's one of the worlds great ironies that the politically committed repeatedly don't understand the need to appeal to those who are not tribal and/or ideologically committed. The Labour party seems to be particularly vulnerable to this (Ed Milli, Corbyn) but the same was true with the Conservatives and Truss...
 

Nicholas Lewis

Established Member
Joined
9 Aug 2019
Messages
6,873
Location
Surrey
It's one of the worlds great ironies that the politically committed repeatedly don't understand the need to appeal to those who are not tribal and/or ideologically committed. The Labour party seems to be particularly vulnerable to this (Ed Milli, Corbyn) but the same was true with the Conservatives and Truss...
At least in our democracy they get found out in the end.
 

Falcon1200

Established Member
Joined
14 Jun 2021
Messages
4,323
Location
Neilston, East Renfrewshire
SNP fear the next arrest will be... Nicola herself.

Blimey

Yes indeed! The SNP situation has got so bad that I almost (almost) find myself feeling sorry for ex-Saint Nicola. But the SNP and their supporters, eg the National newspaper, delight in highlighting every single sleaze-related issue, real or perceived, with the Tories and Labour, now they are being hoist by their own petard (or claymore perhaps).
 

Wynd

Member
Joined
20 Oct 2020
Messages
741
Location
Aberdeenshire
Interesting to note the National is getting heat, when every other publication and media outlet in Scotland is overtly Unionist.

I know people are accepting of the fact that UK media is slanted, but that slant becomes a veritable cliff face in Scotland if you view it objectively.

The finances situation is a saga, but lets see where it settles up. Its telling that the two people arrested so far have been released without charge.

Even if NS is arrested, do we believe she would be charged if the treasurer and CEO of the party have not been? That appears not to pass the first test, but I suppose we are going to find out.
 

SargeNpton

Established Member
Joined
19 Nov 2018
Messages
1,363
Interesting to note the National is getting heat, when every other publication and media outlet in Scotland is overtly Unionist.

I know people are accepting of the fact that UK media is slanted, but that slant becomes a veritable cliff face in Scotland if you view it objectively.

The finances situation is a saga, but lets see where it settles up. Its telling that the two people arrested so far have been released without charge.

Even if NS is arrested, do we believe she would be charged if the treasurer and CEO of the party have not been? That appears not to pass the first test, but I suppose we are going to find out.
I believe that both have been released pending further enquiries.
 

Noddy

Member
Joined
11 Oct 2014
Messages
1,140
Location
UK
Interesting to note the National is getting heat, when every other publication and media outlet in Scotland is overtly Unionist.

You say that but The Scottish Sun (hardly small fry) has backed the SNP in every election since 2011, apart from 2019 (when it refused to back the SNP on the basis it would get Corbyn into power), and were neutral in the 2014 referendum. Various other publications (eg the Daily Record and Sunday Mail) also didn’t endorse either side in 2014, and the Sunday Herald endorsed voting Yes.
 
Last edited:

takno

Established Member
Joined
9 Jul 2016
Messages
5,811
Interesting to note the National is getting heat, when every other publication and media outlet in Scotland is overtly Unionist.

I know people are accepting of the fact that UK media is slanted, but that slant becomes a veritable cliff face in Scotland if you view it objectively.

The finances situation is a saga, but lets see where it settles up. Its telling that the two people arrested so far have been released without charge.

Even if NS is arrested, do we believe she would be charged if the treasurer and CEO of the party have not been? That appears not to pass the first test, but I suppose we are going to find out.
This only works if you view "objective" as being a 50-50 split on the question of union, and angrily demand that all unionist positions are exactly the same. The other media tends (although not exactly stridently in a lot of cases) towards a unionist viewpoint, having arrived there via a variety of positions on how the country should be run. The National is the only of the Scottish newspapers which was explicitly set up as a propaganda rag to flag-wave for Independence and the SNP, and since they haven't at any point shown the faintest inclination to do any actual journalism, so it's not wholly surprising that they tend to come in for a bit of criticism.
 

Wynd

Member
Joined
20 Oct 2020
Messages
741
Location
Aberdeenshire
This only works if you view "objective" as being a 50-50 split on the question of union, and angrily demand that all unionist positions are exactly the same. The other media tends (although not exactly stridently in a lot of cases) towards a unionist viewpoint, having arrived there via a variety of positions on how the country should be run. The National is the only of the Scottish newspapers which was explicitly set up as a propaganda rag to flag-wave for Independence and the SNP, and since they haven't at any point shown the faintest inclination to do any actual journalism, so it's not wholly surprising that they tend to come in for a bit of criticism.
Highlights quite well how causes that one may not support are propaganda but ones that are supported are legitimate with high standards of journalistic integrity. Much of the Unionist media in Scotland is of course, questionable, as recently demonstrated. When the SNP started its recent turmoil, most of the Scottish media got very excited, suggesting this would put independence back.

This represents a fundamental misunderstanding at best, and manipulation at worst, of the political facts. Polling released this week confirms this. The Herald this morning had the following.

This has shown more sophistication amongst the Yes vote than was presumed to exist. It means that voters can fall out of love with the SNP, whether that be for public service performance, for controversial public policy, or indeed for the current police investigation, but that they do not need to simultaneously fall out of love with independence. https://www.heraldscotland.com/poli...dependence-supporters-need-think-unthinkable/

The other notable point:

On the basis that this is an unlikely outcome, it is possible that the only vehicle into which this pro-growth voter will jump is a new one; a separate, pro-growth party of independence.

Now that we have established evidence that independence support is decoupled from SNP fortunes, we can conclude something many have long suspected.

Scotlands politics may be stuck on the constitution, but the resolution to this now rests on the shoulders of a small fraction of the Scottish population. We are in what I would call a kingmaker situation, where undue influence on the outcome is determined by perhaps as little as 5-6% of the Scottish public.

Many of us know them. They are, educated, middle and upper middle class, wealthy, connected but most importantly, they are critical thinkers who are unconvinced by the flagrant rhetoric on both sides, making them pragmatic. Often, they are centrists or very lightly centre right in their politics.

It was revealing that what the Torys in Scotland feared most was Kate Forbes, a Cambridge graduate, with a demonstrable numeric competence.

What would need to happen next to create a new Scottish state is clear. Whether it happens or not, is less clear.
 
Last edited:

AlterEgo

Veteran Member
Joined
30 Dec 2008
Messages
22,475
Location
Rugby
Sturgeon has been arrested in relation to the financial “mismanagement” scandal in the SNP.

Former First Minister Nicola Sturgeon has been arrested in connection with the ongoing investigation into the funding and finances of the SNP.

Former First Minister Nicola Sturgeon arrested in SNP finance inquiry https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-65871857
 

brad465

Established Member
Joined
11 Aug 2010
Messages
7,841
Location
Taunton or Kent
Here's the breaking news report:


Former First Minister Nicola Sturgeon has been arrested in connection with the ongoing investigation into the funding and finances of the SNP.
Police confirmed a 52-year-old woman was taken into custody on Sunday and is being questioned by detectives.
 

brad465

Established Member
Joined
11 Aug 2010
Messages
7,841
Location
Taunton or Kent
"This is a slow news week."
Dorries: "Hold my beer."
Johnson: "No, hold by beer."
Sturgeon: "No, hold my beer."
 

AlterEgo

Veteran Member
Joined
30 Dec 2008
Messages
22,475
Location
Rugby
It must be of considerable comfort for Sturgeon that she resigned for entirely unrelated reasons (!).
 

duncanp

Established Member
Joined
16 Aug 2012
Messages
4,856
Such a shame isn't it.

I must go out and buy a lottery ticket whilst I'm still feeling lucky.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top