• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

NR freight "route" to go ahead

Status
Not open for further replies.

snowball

Established Member
Joined
4 Mar 2013
Messages
7,739
Location
Leeds
The Shaw review recommended that NR create a new "route" for freight. This press release says it's going ahead:

http://www.networkrailmediacentre.c...for-freight-and-national-passengers-operators

Network Rail creates ‘virtual route’ to provide better service for freight and national passengers operators

A new ‘virtual route’ for rail freight and national passenger operators will become Network Rail’s ninth devolved operational route.

The change is part of the company’s strategy to become an increasingly customer-focused and route-led business and is consistent with the recommendations of the Shaw report, which proposed a number of actions for Network Rail to consider to protect and enhance the interests of all customers as accountability continues to be devolved.

The new route will be led by Paul McMahon, who returns to Network Rail’s freight business in an expanded role as managing director, freight and national passenger operators. The new structure will enable the company to re-allocate focus and resources to deliver improvements in four key areas:

Extending customer representation: The new, nationally focused team will take on responsibility for CrossCountry, which runs services on seven of the current eight routes, enhancing support for customers who operate nationally
Delivery of safe operational performance: Additional resource will seek to improve safety both on- and off-network while continuing to out-perform regulatory performance targets
Business development: Regional business development managers will identify opportunities for growth and secure third party funding from end-users to boost delivery of freight schemes
Enhanced governance arrangements: Proposals for enhanced governance for CrossCountry and other national operators will be put forward following a review involving train operating companies, the freight sector and industry bodies

Phil Hufton, managing director, England & Wales, said: “Rail freight is absolutely vital to Britain’s economy and the changes we are putting in place will mean we are better able to represent the interests of our freight and national passenger service customers.

“Freight operators’ satisfaction with the service they receive from Network Rail has improved significantly – but it’s important we continue to challenge ourselves to do more for all our customers, ensuring that their needs are balanced with those of train operating companies who wholly or predominantly operate on a single route.”

New route managing director for Wales

Network Rail has today also announced Andy Thomas will join the company as route managing director for Wales route in August. Paul McMahon will stay in post until then as interim route managing director, after which he will take up his new freight and national passenger operator role.

Mr Thomas will join from the Keolis Group, where he is currently managing director, Hyderabad Mass Transit in India. He has had a wide-ranging international career in rail, transport and industrial sectors, including successful strategic leadership roles with Transport for New South Wales in Australia and Transport for London, where he was head of strategic planning and performance.

Incidentally I hate NR's use of the term "route" for its geographical divisions.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

The Planner

Veteran Member
Joined
15 Apr 2008
Messages
15,961
Should be fun then if/when the new North route gets going too, will be interesting under devolution as to how the funds are split.
 

MarkyT

Established Member
Joined
20 May 2012
Messages
6,250
Location
Torbay
The Shaw review recommended that NR create a new "route" for freight. This press release says it's going ahead:

http://www.networkrailmediacentre.c...for-freight-and-national-passengers-operators



Incidentally I hate NR's use of the term "route" for its geographical divisions.

The problem is all the alternative names have been used before: regions, divisions, territories, areas etc. Clearly it is not possible to reuse such a classification for fear of harking back to a particular superseded era!

Seriously though the fairly traditional route structure we have today and it's aspirations for further devolution certainly gives a major advantages to the main TOC on a particular route and this is strengthened by the desire to put operations staff of both main TOC and the infrastructure steward together into the same ROCs. Whilst SWT (say) could easily place it's real time fleet and crew schedulers etc into the Basingstoke ROC, to get the same representation, a national scale FOC or TOC would have to spread staff very thinly around all the ROCs, despite only running a comparatively small number of trains in each area. I have no problem with ROCs but perhaps TOC ops control is best done in a parallel set of separate control centres that each have different and themselves overlapping boundaries corresponding to their sphere of operations, also overlapping multiple infrastructure based ROC areas as neccessary.
 

The Planner

Veteran Member
Joined
15 Apr 2008
Messages
15,961
TOCs sat in control has been tried before and the TOCs moved back out again. I certainly know that it happened at Birmingham in years gone by.
 

LNW-GW Joint

Veteran Member
Joined
22 Feb 2011
Messages
19,678
Location
Mold, Clwyd
So Cross Country is no longer an orphan. ;)
Interesting that Freight/National Route is a virtual construct and owns no infrastructure, not even freight-only branches.
I suppose this is also the likely home for charter-type operations.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top