NRCoC replaced by NRCoT from 1/10/2016

Discussion in 'Fares Advice & Policy' started by OwlMan, 21 Sep 2016.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Bletchleyite

    Bletchleyite Veteran Member

    Messages:
    39,506
    Joined:
    20 Oct 2014
    Location:
    Up and down the south WCML (mostly)
    It isn't specifically, so I expect it was added to avoid confusion which has occurred.
     
  2. hairyhandedfool

    hairyhandedfool Established Member

    Messages:
    8,838
    Joined:
    14 Apr 2008
    It was sent with a copy of the ATOC briefing, by email. The ATOC briefing implied the only differences were changes to compensation and re-ordering of the conditions. You'll notice in the list that Condition 3 is now listed as "Condition 6.3?", indicating that even those who wrote it don't really know where Condition 3 has gone.

    The Northern offices will have got it, but how many will have read beyond what the briefing says? Not many I suspect, and because the briefing should contain all the changes (it falls a long way short of that), or at least an indication of them.

    Yep, virtually every Delay Repay and Customer Promise they sent me will go in the bin. Officially I have no stock of them and I should print some out from the internet if required.

    Expect lots more of that.

    You're lucky to get emails these days, communication is shocking, even information about the changes to ticket styles are few and far between. And when we do get emails, the lack of any really useful information makes the briefing near pointless.

    Nope, barely get a briefing every month.

    They should read them, though Guards will obviously depend on Managers receiving the email and posting it on a notice board (which doesn't always happen).

    My Customer Promise leaflets should have been delivered on Saturday (office was open) still not got them. Delay Repay forms are, apparently, due this week, not holding my breath.

    No, by Courier.

    Where recycling bins are provided, I'm sure staff will consider that option.
     
  3. Solent&Wessex

    Solent&Wessex Established Member

    Messages:
    2,249
    Joined:
    9 Jul 2009
    I concur wholeheartedly with the first statement.
    The dissemination of important and useful retail information at my TOC is next to non-existent. What information is circulated is normally incomplete, late, and very haphazard - some locations and colleagues will get it, others won't.

    As for Guards, most of the time the information comes via email. Sometimes on a bit of paper in your pigeon hole. Sometimes just displayed on a notice. There is no real consistency. Some information now gets put onto a staff app on our phones, but this only works when connected to good 3G or 4G, and stuff on there can't be downloaded for offline viewing, so not much use if you want to refer to it enroute where the phone signal is poor - which is most places.

    I have got bored of raising the issue over the years and now don't bother as most managers don't seem to either care, have the time, or it isn't their job.
     
  4. infobleep

    infobleep Established Member

    Messages:
    8,763
    Joined:
    27 Feb 2011
    Let's hope the courier hasn't been waiting around since Saturday to collect the leaflets. That would be expensive. Lol.

    I'd expect all offices these days to provide recycling or ha e a very good reason they they cannot.

    Sent from my SM-G925F using Tapatalk
    --- old post above --- --- new post below ---
    Such a shame that some companies and people can't be bothered. Might as well all give up and not bother.

    Sent from my SM-G925F using Tapatalk
     
  5. Merseysider

    Merseysider Established Member Fares Advisor

    Messages:
    4,279
    Joined:
    22 Jan 2014
    Location:
    Birmingham
    Well, as expected, there were issues on the 1312 Liverpool LS - Manchester Vic today, with the TPE guard claiming my father's combination of a Merseyside Concessionary Pass and a Greater Manchester Conc Wayfarer was invalid. 'We don't get any money from that'.

    Twitter post to TPE

    :roll:

    (And yes, they are being emailed)
     
    Last edited: 6 Oct 2016
  6. sheff1

    sheff1 Established Member

    Messages:
    4,068
    Joined:
    24 Dec 2009
    Location:
    Sheffield
    Don't think this has been mentioned before, but 16.1 states:

    The Conditions in this section apply to ordinary train Tickets, but may vary for individual products, especially discount and promotional Tickets. The conditions and any exclusions applying to these will be explained when you buy those Tickets.

    The following paragraphs then relate to BOJ etc.

    'ordinary' is not defined anywhere in the document. The second part of the sentence suggests that 'ordinary' may ("especially") mean tickets which have not been discounted in some way, but 'discount tickets' is not defined either except tangentially in that if you buy one of these things any exclusions will be explained at the time.

    Logically then it must be the case that any ticket bought without an accompanying explanation of exclusions must be an 'ordinary' one and hence the conditions in 16 will apply.

    It would be a lot easier for everyone if all words with specific meanings were defined in Appendix B. As it stands we can only guess or assume things which is not ideal when considering Term & Conditions.
     
    Last edited: 6 Oct 2016
  7. bignosemac

    bignosemac Established Member

    Messages:
    4,934
    Joined:
    12 Oct 2009
    No need to guess or assume. The interpretation most favourable to the consumer shall prevail.

    14.2 allows the ticket/pass combination JakeF's father held to be used on a service that doesn't call at the split point. That's all that matters. Another condition that may be interpreted as preventing said use cannot trump 14.2.
     
  8. CyrusWuff

    CyrusWuff Established Member

    Messages:
    2,142
    Joined:
    20 May 2013
    I think the TPE Conductor would be right, though not for the reason stated...By my reckoning, the Merseyside pass is valid as far as Newton-le-Willows (NLW), but the Wayfarer is only valid from Patricroft (PAT), so such a combination would also require you to hold a ticket between NLW and PAT.

    I should note, however, that this is based on public information as I'm not at work to check right now, but the maps don't show either NLW or PAT as being in both areas.
     
  9. sheff1

    sheff1 Established Member

    Messages:
    4,068
    Joined:
    24 Dec 2009
    Location:
    Sheffield
    NLW is in the Wayfarer area:
    http://www.tfgm.com/journey_planning/Documents/PDFMaps/Wayfarer-Rail-diagram.pdf
     
  10. Kite159

    Kite159 Veteran Member

    Messages:
    12,850
    Joined:
    27 Jan 2014
    Location:
    West of Andover
    The GM Wayfarer is valid from Warrington and Earlestown so there is an overlap of validity.

    The GM rail rover is only valid to Pat.
     
  11. bignosemac

    bignosemac Established Member

    Messages:
    4,934
    Joined:
    12 Oct 2009
    The maps I'm looking at do. Both show Newton-le-Willows.

    http://www.merseytravel.gov.uk/Site Documents/MerseyrailNetworkMap.pdf
    http://www.tfgm.com/journey_planning/Documents/PDFMaps/Wayfarer-Rail-diagram.pdf
     
  12. Merseysider

    Merseysider Established Member Fares Advisor

    Messages:
    4,279
    Joined:
    22 Jan 2014
    Location:
    Birmingham
    I'm afraid that's incorrect; you must be looking at the wrong map. The GM Wayfarer includes ERL/NLW and is a different product to the Rail Ranger.
     
  13. LowLevel

    LowLevel Established Member

    Messages:
    3,379
    Joined:
    26 Oct 2013
    Much the same as on the Cheshire Lines GM passes only go to Glazebrook but the Wayfarer is valid to Warrington.

    I'm glad this change has come in to be honest as I was getting fed up with Merseyrail booking clerks trying to be helpful by selling passengers tickets split at Hough Green or Glazebrook and thus technically restricting them to the local services.

    Still banging my head against a wall trying to educate them that their clever money saving split at Newton le Willows doesn't entitle them to sail along flashing their passes on CLC services that go nowhere near it though.
     
  14. Solent&Wessex

    Solent&Wessex Established Member

    Messages:
    2,249
    Joined:
    9 Jul 2009
    Probably because the guard wouldn't have been aware that anything had changed.
     
  15. Merseysider

    Merseysider Established Member Fares Advisor

    Messages:
    4,279
    Joined:
    22 Jan 2014
    Location:
    Birmingham
    Yes, that's probably the case. Unfortunate really.
     
  16. CyrusWuff

    CyrusWuff Established Member

    Messages:
    2,142
    Joined:
    20 May 2013
    I stand corrected. I was just looking at the normal TfGM Rail Network Map, which seemed perfectly logical at the time. (Yes, I know logic and the rail industry tend not to go together half the time, but still...)
     
  17. Loop & Link

    Loop & Link Member

    Messages:
    515
    Joined:
    22 Feb 2015
    When I do that split, I've give them a journey print of what services they can and can't use, so there's no confusion. Some though have just preferred to get there as quick as possible on that xx:12 so it's a full price ticket (not an issue anymore though)

    Also it's pointless going via CLC doing the ticket from Hough Green as it's the same price from Hough Green to Manchester as it is from Liverpool Stns so I've always offered the route via the Chat Moss.

    We are just trying to be helpful and save them a bit of money!!

    Obviously makes life easier now with the new NRCoT
     
  18. LowLevel

    LowLevel Established Member

    Messages:
    3,379
    Joined:
    26 Oct 2013
    I know you are and it speaks well of the staff that they are willing to do little things to help their customers. My gripe was simply that people were being sold the splits without being told the restrictions which made it a bit difficult for those of us on board. Hallelujah though - the new terms make it no longer an issue.
     
  19. Loop & Link

    Loop & Link Member

    Messages:
    515
    Joined:
    22 Feb 2015
    No problem :)

    Just making sure we aren't all tarred with the brush ;)

    That's it I always say you need to be on a train that stops at NLW so I say you can only get the xx:16/xx:20 for example. If you tell them that there's no chance of it going wrong for anyone! Another one we used to get a lot was Garswood-Blackpool North, (not so much now there are no through trains) I had to point out to someone that none of the Blackpool's stopped at Garswood so it wasn't possible.
     
  20. rs101

    rs101 Member

    Messages:
    208
    Joined:
    13 Aug 2013
    Just wondering how long TOCs have to replace their ticket stock? I purchased tickets on Monday which state on the back that they're issued subject to NRCoC.. This was from Manningtree station....
     
  21. causton

    causton Established Member

    Messages:
    5,268
    Joined:
    4 Aug 2010
    Location:
    Somewhere between WY372 and MV7
    Probably a long time. It's not been long since we got the last batch of new stock in (ATOCAD01) which has adverts for railcards, NRE, etc on the back, and still says NRCoC...
     
  22. bignosemac

    bignosemac Established Member

    Messages:
    4,934
    Joined:
    12 Oct 2009
    I doubt they'll be replaced. Just used up.

    Follow the advice on the rear and you'll get the new conditions, either at a station or by going to nationalrail.co.uk.

    No need to throw away perfectly good ticket stock.
     
  23. jon0844

    jon0844 Veteran Member

    Messages:
    23,889
    Joined:
    1 Feb 2009
    Location:
    UK
    If they're going to replace ticket stock, will the orange bands be reduced in size a bit to better fit the new ticket design?
     
  24. Solent&Wessex

    Solent&Wessex Established Member

    Messages:
    2,249
    Joined:
    9 Jul 2009
    There is actually no need to replace any literature or tickets unless it presents facts which are wrong. The new NRCoT says:
     
  25. furlong

    furlong Established Member

    Messages:
    1,918
    Joined:
    28 Mar 2013
    Location:
    Reading
    That won't wash where you are still presented with the contents of the old NRCoC when you ask (e.g. follow the link on the website when making the purchase) and the new document leaves you in a worse position than the old.
     
  26. najaB

    najaB Veteran Member

    Messages:
    19,547
    Joined:
    28 Aug 2011
    Location:
    Scotland
    Ooh, ooh, can I say it before Yorkie does? Where there is a conflict between conditions the one that is more favourable to the customer must be used.
     
  27. rs101

    rs101 Member

    Messages:
    208
    Joined:
    13 Aug 2013
    So why isn't there information displayed at the station to say that all tickets are sold subject to the NRCoT since 1st October? Would it not be common sense to put a poster up or a sticker on the ticket office window and machines?
    --- old post above --- --- new post below ---

    So that could well be a term from the NRCoC if that's favourable... Especially when there's no information at point of sale that the stated terms don't apply.
     
  28. sheff1

    sheff1 Established Member

    Messages:
    4,068
    Joined:
    24 Dec 2009
    Location:
    Sheffield
    All the websites I have used to book tickets since 1 Oct have linked through to the new NRCoT.
     
  29. Deerfold

    Deerfold Established Member

    Messages:
    9,938
    Joined:
    26 Nov 2009
    Location:
    Yorkshire
    And then when you get your tickets via TOD they say they're valid as per the NRCoC. If I Google NRCoC, I get the conditions valid from July 2015 on the National Rail site as my first result with nothing to say they're no longer in use.
     
  30. Merseysider

    Merseysider Established Member Fares Advisor

    Messages:
    4,279
    Joined:
    22 Jan 2014
    Location:
    Birmingham
    I'm surprised an addendum hasn't been added to the previous Conditions with reference to the new Conditions.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page