• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Paisley Canal Electrication

Status
Not open for further replies.

ole man

Member
Joined
6 Jul 2011
Messages
739
Location
LEC5
Can somebody give me a answer to what type of electrification is going up on the Paisley canel route?
Freightliner are asking Network Rail for compensation because there loco's and wagons will not be able to use the line when it gets wired up, why is this?.
What are the height differences between a 66 or 70 and a electric loco with its pan up?
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Chris125

Established Member
Joined
12 Nov 2009
Messages
3,076
There's a good description of the work and the thinking behind it on pages 65,66 & 67 of the Alternative Solutions RUS, but basically the overhead wires when live will only allow certain classes of EMU underneath such as 314's and 380's - this avoids a lot of bridge rebuilding/trackbed lowering and along with the waiving of compensation to Scotrail gives the scheme a positive business case, though it would make life more awkward for any operator wishing to use the mothballed oil terminal at Hawkhead.

Chris
 
Last edited:

87015

Established Member
Joined
3 Mar 2006
Messages
4,905
Location
GEML/WCML/SR
None, there's an oil terminal but it's been disused for some time.

CHris
It is a strategic terminal though as its the old (and current backup) terminal for aviation fuel to one of the airports - pretty sure its Glasgow but could be Prestwick.
 

HSTEd

Veteran Member
Joined
14 Jul 2011
Messages
16,710
How is this a problem for accessing the terminal? It's already wired that far.

Do you mean why would extending the electrification be a problem for access in this case?

It is because the electrification extension will not be gauge cleared for the existing loading gauge while the equipment is live.
This means that any attempt to run large gauge freight vehicles down the line, including Class 66s, would require the overhead equipment be isolated.

This requires delays and means that you effectively cannot serve teh depot during the day without a nightmarishly complex procedure.
 

HSTEd

Veteran Member
Joined
14 Jul 2011
Messages
16,710
Why not serve the depot at night with an isolation on?

Yes, you could do this, but only after all passenger service has ceased.

And either way it is a major inconvenience to freight operations.
 

Chris125

Established Member
Joined
12 Nov 2009
Messages
3,076
And either way it is a major inconvenience to freight operations.

...that don't currently exist and there are no plans for - a small price to pay for a cheap fill-in electrification project that would otherwise be unviable.

Chris
 

bluenoxid

Established Member
Joined
9 Feb 2008
Messages
2,461
So is this going to be a problem for FL when they are running infrastructure trains such as Autoballasters?

How much of a difference in profile is a 66 to an EMU?
 

sprinterguy

Established Member
Joined
4 Mar 2010
Messages
11,060
Location
Macclesfield
How is this a problem for accessing the terminal? It's already wired that far.
It wasn't before the present electrification work commenced. The oil terminal is at Hawkhead, near the western end of the branch, whereas the limit of electrification was previously Corkerhill.

I would have thought however that the dense collection of mature trees outside of the unloading compound at the terminal would have been a bigger hindrance to Freightliner in any case.
 

Chris125

Established Member
Joined
12 Nov 2009
Messages
3,076
So is this going to be a problem for FL when they are running infrastructure trains such as Autoballasters?

How much of a difference in profile is a 66 to an EMU?

The second post in this thread should hopefully provide you with an answer.

Chris
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top