Donny Dave
Established Member
Rest in peace.
So sadly there is one confirmed fatality. Obviously I'm glad that it isn't one-hundred fatalities, but one life lost in an incident like this is one too many in my opinion.Virgin Trains said:Urgent Information
24 February 2007, 04:35
Statement Issue No: 3
Statement from Virgin Trains
Serious incident in Cumbria
It is with deep regret that Virgin Trains can confirm that there has been one fatality in an accident that took place shortly after 20:00 on Friday 23 February 2007 near Lambrigg, north of Oxenholme in Cumbria.
The train involved was the 17:15 from London Euston to Glasgow Central, operated by Virgin Trains.
The first thoughts of everyone at Virgin Trains are with the families and loved ones of those who have lost their lives or been injured in this terrible accident. We will do whatever we can to offer assistance in the days ahead.
The emergency services have issued the following number for friends or relatives concerned about anybody travelling on the train: 0800 056 0146 (00 44 20 7158 0198 from overseas).
Trains travelling towards Edinburgh and Glasgow will terminate at Lancaster while those travelling from Glasgow/Edinburgh will terminate at Lockerbie. Replacement coaches will link the two stations.
Nigel Harris of RAIL has just been having a go at him on Sky News. Apparently Mr Crow didn't even know Network Rail do maintenance in house. Nigel Haris was definetly on 'damage limitation mode' for the railwaysI see Mr Crow of the RMT is already speculating the cause is similar to Potters bar. In which case it is deeply suspicious.
Any chane of the S&C opening up and the engineering works being cancelled?
Richard Branson has just named and praised the driver.
We've had similar accidents in the past with various train types that have involved little or no fatalities. Anyone remember Colwich where one train smashed into another at 100mph with the only fatalities being the driver, and that involved Mk1, 2 and 3, and there have been nuerous high speed derailments with little or no fatalities. At Purley a Mk1 EMU hit another train and fell down an embankment (much bigger than this) with just 4 fatalities. In the fairly high fatality derailments at Potters Bar, Ufton Nervet and Polmont the fact that at least one coach was flung violantly around was the main reason for the deaths, although in all 3 cases coaches remained largely intact. That's not saying the Pendolino didn't stand up well, but no more than most types would have. If anything though, we've probably got the relativly light loading, in particular at the front which was most effected, to thank for the very low death toll and fairly low number of serious injuries.
When i used this very same train in FC, between London and Preston, it was quite busy. I did get a seat though. The 16:46 ex Euston has also been overcrowded before, due to TM annoyingly having a FC coach declassified when i was on it.
So you would rather standard class was dangerously over-crowded. Just because you travel first class stop thinking you are better than everyone else :mad:
Thank you for putting it into perspective Chris.We've had similar accidents in the past with various train types that have involved little or no fatalities. Anyone remember Colwich where one train smashed into another at 100mph with the only fatalities being the driver, and that involved Mk1, 2 and 3, and there have been nuerous high speed derailments with little or no fatalities. At Purley a Mk1 EMU hit another train and fell down an embankment (much bigger than this) with just 4 fatalities. In the fairly high fatality derailments at Potters Bar, Ufton Nervet and Polmont the fact that at least one coach was flung violantly around was the main reason for the deaths, although in all 3 cases coaches remained largely intact. That's not saying the Pendolino didn't stand up well, but no more than most types would have. If anything though, we've probably got the relativly light loading, in particular at the front which was most effected, to thank for the very low death toll and fairly low number of serious injuries.
They're nowhere near as flexible as a saver though.I just think that people should be aware of Value First singles, which could be used, at a similar price than the saver.
Cue the usual "trains are dangerous, no wonder more people tend to fly or drive" etc. rants. Hopefully the aftermath won't be a partial repeat of Potters Bar i.e. nationwide disruption as all the infrastructure is checked under paranoia that faults are more widespread, nationwide apprehension brought about by media coverage that the railways are unsafe, etc.