Worcester Parkway would have been a better and much shorter name for the station. However, anyone who calls it Worcester Park should be redirected to South West London
I agree, it should be called Worcester Parkway. Presumably it has been changed for political reasons as the station has been funded by Worcestershire County Council and they didn’t want people thinking it was the work of Worcester City Council. However I wouldn’t be surprised if most people call it Worcester Parkway anyway.
As someone who lives in the Midlands, it occurred to me the idea for a new station where the Cotswold lines and Birmingham - Bristol line cross has been around for decades and the name was originally going to be Worcester Parkway. I have done a bit of research and found out that the plans go back as far as the 1970s, and it was originally Worcester Parkway. Apparently BR was planning to build it but paused the plans in 1979 when it didn’t get authorisation for as many cross-country HSTs as it wanted, so presumably didn’t have the stock to provide the service. Ironically, perhaps the thinking is somewhat similar now that the XC Voyagers do not serve the new station? Anyway, I found this information on a scan of an old RDS (Railway Development Society, now Railfuture) newsletter from 1979. The item is on page 8.
RDS Newsletter No. 3 - April 1979
The article seems to imply the station would have opened in May 1982 had BR got approval for the full number of HSTs required. So that makes the station nearly 38 years late! I wonder if that is some kind of record? Does anyone know of a station that took longer to open from the original official planned date?