• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Possibility of a full-size electric heritage railway

renegademaster

Established Member
Joined
22 Jun 2023
Messages
1,484
Location
Croydon
The difficulties of adding third rail or overheads to an existing non-electrified preserved railway surely means that it won't happen. What would be the attraction for the general. (non-enthusiast) public? Because unless it attracts them in sufficient numbers, it won't be financially viable.

The big question that doesn't seem to have been addressed is : why do you want an electrified preserved railway? If it is to run specific items of preserved stock (and I wouldn't mind a ride in a 4DD), then surely the simplest and easiest solution would be to restore it to mainline standards, and run it on the national network.

The only hope I see for a new preserved electric railway would be if an existing electrified line were slated for closure. Can't think of any obvious contenders.
The dinner and wine crowd who fund railtours aren't going to be especially fond of taking a VEP on a 2 hour journey to Margate. The financial dynamics is very different from preserved diesel and AC locos do on railtours.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

50002Superb

Member
Joined
18 Aug 2021
Messages
1,150
Location
Nottingham
Something like this is probably the only way. It's bound to be easier to preserve an electrified railway, than to electrify a preserved railway. The safety case will be easier to demonstrate, the infrastructure already exists, and you won't have to deal with rose-tinted spectacles quite so much.

That said... I have a sense that the electric stock that would be most appealing to the general public is vintage 750V third rail EMUs. The regulatory response to new 750V in the hands of the operational railway is a firm 'No'. In the hands of a preserved railway, not a chance.
Glad someone’s acknowledged it!!
 

A S Leib

Established Member
Joined
9 Sep 2018
Messages
1,505
The only hope I see for a new preserved electric railway would be if an existing electrified line were slated for closure. Can't think of any obvious contenders
I think Croxley – Watford's the electrified passenger line which has come closest to closure in recent years, but even had the Croxley Rail Link gone ahead I think the plan was to keep it for stabling trains at Watford.

The Island Line feels like it's been closed more frequently than not over the past few years, but equally I doubt it would be abandoned easily having had so much investment put into it.

Which currently electrified routes would have the most demand for heritage services? Something like Liverpool – Oxenholme or Penrith, from a large settlement on a scenic route and without (many) normal direct services?
 

eldomtom2

On Moderation
Joined
6 Oct 2018
Messages
1,830
That said... I have a sense that the electric stock that would be most appealing to the general public is vintage 750V third rail EMUs. The regulatory response to new 750V in the hands of the operational railway is a firm 'No'. In the hands of a preserved railway, not a chance.
Fit trolley poles and string up 750V DC wires as has been done in the US? As has been mentioned, there are preserved DC tramways...
 

Richard Scott

Established Member
Associate Staff
International Transport
Railtours & Preservation
Joined
13 Dec 2018
Messages
3,981
Fit trolley poles and string up 750V DC wires as has been done in the US? As has been mentioned, there are preserved DC tramways...
Would need hefty wires to deal with current demands, a 4-VEP will take much more current than a tram.
 

eldomtom2

On Moderation
Joined
6 Oct 2018
Messages
1,830
Would need hefty wires to deal with current demands, a 4-VEP will take much more current than a tram.
In America it's been done with NYC subway trains, strolling along a preserved line will require a lot less power than the intensive commuter service they were built for.
 

xotGD

Established Member
Joined
4 Feb 2017
Messages
6,501
Something like this is probably the only way. It's bound to be easier to preserve an electrified railway, than to electrify a preserved railway. The safety case will be easier to demonstrate, the infrastructure already exists, and you won't have to deal with rose-tinted spectacles quite so much.

That said... I have a sense that the electric stock that would be most appealing to the general public is vintage 750V third rail EMUs. The regulatory response to new 750V in the hands of the operational railway is a firm 'No'. In the hands of a preserved railway, not a chance.
The general public won't care if there is a 33 or 73 hauling or shoving the stock. It is just cranks (and a small minority of cranks at that) who would be fussed about the true third rail experience. Indeed, plenty of cranks would be happier if the emu was being dragged.
 

Indigo Soup

Member
Joined
17 May 2018
Messages
1,127
The general public won't care if there is a 33 or 73 hauling or shoving the stock.
The general public would probably prefer it if a self-propelled kettle (ideally Flying Scotsman or the Hogwarts Express) was hauling the stock, much to the chagrin of the enthusiasts!
 

Sun Chariot

Established Member
Joined
16 Mar 2009
Messages
2,464
Location
2 miles and 50 years away from the Longmoor Milita
That's not especially simple or easy...
It's a shame that 1994's closure of the ex-GER Epping-Ongar route, didn't offer opportunity for an electrified self-contained line.
Main line loading gauge. 3rd rail DC. LU's 4th rail could have been removed.
I guess it all boiled back down to the same points previously covered - circumstances, operating / maintenance costs and knowledge, safety-cases, how much customer demand for it, return on investment.
 

norbitonflyer

Established Member
Joined
24 Mar 2020
Messages
3,306
Location
SW London
Yes, the Class 71s were fitted with a pantograph for this reason. The wires were energised at 650 V DC (as was some of the third rail network itself IIRC).
So were the orignal SR "Booster" locos
srly_cc1-3.jpg
 

Richard Scott

Established Member
Associate Staff
International Transport
Railtours & Preservation
Joined
13 Dec 2018
Messages
3,981
In America it's been done with NYC subway trains, strolling along a preserved line will require a lot less power than the intensive commuter service they were built for.
Yes it will but still need some hefty cabling, if I remember rightly there's not too much control on current demand on an SR unit as they used camshafts to drop out resistances as the unit accelerated so still a considerable starting current was drawn.
 

renegademaster

Established Member
Joined
22 Jun 2023
Messages
1,484
Location
Croydon
A 5BEL on the other hand...
That has the opposite problem of only getting the £400 a seat crowd and not the 140 cranks like me in standard. Could steal the business of the DB cargo Pullman services but the luxury railtours that can only go to the southeast market can't be huge either
 

StephenHunter

Established Member
Joined
22 Jul 2017
Messages
2,330
Location
London
That has the opposite problem of only getting the £400 a seat crowd and not the 140 cranks like me in standard. Could steal the business of the DB cargo Pullman services but the luxury railtours that can only go to the southeast market can't be huge either
It's planned to have it work with a 73 as well.
 

Sun Chariot

Established Member
Joined
16 Mar 2009
Messages
2,464
Location
2 miles and 50 years away from the Longmoor Milita
Were there three of them, all slightly different?
Yes - three members of the fleet. The first two, CC1 and CC2, were "true" Southern Railway machines.
CC1 (1941) had route indicator stencil at construction; CC2 (1945) had SR route indicator discs.
This link has a very interesting photo of CC1 in wartime grey - but with a darker coloured central band containing the words SOUTHERN ELECTRIC - other photos I've seen of it, are in all over mid grey and omitting the wording.
The third emerged just after Nationalisation as 20003; and it sported differences internally & externally.
 
Last edited:

DustyBin

Established Member
Joined
20 Sep 2020
Messages
3,783
Location
First Class
Yes - three members of the fleet. The first two, CC1 and CC2, were "true" Southern Railway machines.
CC1 (1941) had route indicator stencil at construction; CC2 (1945) had SR route indicator discs.
This link has a very interesting photo of CC1 in wartime grey - but with a darker coloured central band containing the words SOUTHERN ELECTRIC - other photos I've seen of it, are in all over mid grey and omitting the wording.
The third emerged just after Nationalisation as 20003; and it sported differences internally & externally.

Thanks. I recall reading about these locos a long time ago, but couldn’t remember very much about them!
 

hotelmode

Member
Joined
23 Jun 2009
Messages
43
That has the opposite problem of only getting the £400 a seat crowd and not the 140 cranks like me in standard. Could steal the business of the DB cargo Pullman services but the luxury railtours that can only go to the southeast market can't be huge either

I suspect its bigger than you think. Just not the traditional all day steam tour. A circular route out of a London termini for 3 hrs, leaving at 7ish in the evening and a longer Sunday lunch itinerary with fine dining will be quite attractive. I'm guessing the operating costs will be way lower than the VSOE or a conventional steam tour?

If they could be priced at or below the sunset steam express prices I think there's plenty of takers if well marketed.
 

AY1975

Established Member
Joined
14 Dec 2016
Messages
1,856
Summerlee and the Black Country Museum are both essentially permanently closed due to, again, issues around their overhead and competence of those maintaining (or not).
According to this article from the British Trams Online site, the Black Country Museum tramway was closed down indefinitely in December 2013:

www.britishtramsonline.co.uk/news/?p=6148

"2013 has ended on a very sour note for one of the UK’s heritage tramways, with the shock news just after Christmas that the short operating line at the Black Country Living Museum at Dudley has been closed down indefinitely. This follows a lengthy period of neglect for what is the only narrow gauge tramway in a British museum.

Recently, an independent assessment of the tramway infrastructure was commissioned. It has been suspected for a long time that the tram track was in a very poor condition, and the findings of this examination were in fact so bad, that the line was condemned with immediate effect."

Do you know whether they plan to get ride of their trams and trolleybuses, or keep them as static exhibits?

Also, do you know when they last ran at Summerlee?

There was also an earlier now locked thread on operating preserved electric traction at https://www.railforums.co.uk/threads/running-electric-traction-in-preservation.166347/
 
Last edited:

Gostav

Member
Joined
14 May 2016
Messages
457
According to this article from the British Trams Online site, the Black Country Museum tramway was closed down indefinitely in December 2013:

www.britishtramsonline.co.uk/news/?p=6148

"2013 has ended on a very sour note for one of the UK’s heritage tramways, with the shock news just after Christmas that the short operating line at the Black Country Living Museum at Dudley has been closed down indefinitely. This follows a lengthy period of neglect for what is the only narrow gauge tramway in a British museum.

Recently, an independent assessment of the tramway infrastructure was commissioned. It has been suspected for a long time that the tram track was in a very poor condition, and the findings of this examination were in fact so bad, that the line was condemned with immediate effect."

Do you know whether they plan to get ride of their trams and trolleybuses, or keep them as static exhibits?

Also, do you know when they last ran at Summerlee?

There was also an earlier now locked thread on operating preserved electric traction at https://www.railforums.co.uk/threads/running-electric-traction-in-preservation.166347/
I visited there in October and the staff/volunteer told me the trolley bus is not in operating over 3 years.
 

AY1975

Established Member
Joined
14 Dec 2016
Messages
1,856
Summerlee and the Black Country Museum are both essentially permanently closed due to, again, issues around their overhead and competence of those maintaining (or not).
According to the Summerlee entry on the North Lanarkshire Council website at https://culturenl.co.uk/museums/visiting-us/summerlee/:

"Please note: Due to an electrical issue on the tram lines, the trams are not running at the moment. We are working to resolve the issue and hope to have the trams running again soon."

The last sentence sounds somewhat optimistic!
I visited there in October and the staff/volunteer told me the trolley bus is not in operating over 3 years.
I presume you mean the Black Country Museum rather than Summerlee, as I didn't know that the latter had ever had trolleybuses.

Assuming that you are referring to the former, according to the article that I linked in entry #114 above:

www.britishtramsonline.co.uk/news/?p=6148

"As if the news about the museum’s tramway wasn’t bad enough, their operational trolleybuses have also been mothballed due to concerns about the presence of asbestos in these historic vehicles. Although this is apparently safely contained and within acceptable regulated guidelines, surveyers have refused to examine the condition of the trolleybuses for this reason and all are therefore now out of service as well. This leaves a vintage bus as the sole means of transportation for visitors around the museum site at present, and having seen the effects of intensive use on Wolverhampton 34, this could have dire consequences for the bus if this situation is allowed to continue for too long."

Which would suggest that that this issue was later resolved but another problem with their trolleybuses has occurred more recently.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Richard Scott

Established Member
Associate Staff
International Transport
Railtours & Preservation
Joined
13 Dec 2018
Messages
3,981
For limited 15 mph movements to get on the juice rail and only where juice rails were deemed too dangerous.
Would imagine current draw was severely limited?
 

contrex

Member
Joined
19 May 2009
Messages
1,049
Location
St Werburghs, Bristol
Would imagine current draw was severely limited?
I don't know about the current draw being 'severely' limited. The speed certainly was, by line speed restrictions in the yard (and by the laws of physics, I imagine). It might take a significant amount of current to get a heavy freight moving from a standstill; you'd certainly make the copper cross section substantial. I have seen a video, shot at night, of a French 1500v DC loco starting a freight in a yard, and slowly moving along it, and after each time the loco rocks on the uneven siding and makes an arc, you can see the overhead (double) glowing red and fading again. You wouldn't want it melting or getting soft and sagging too often. The ultimate current draw would be limited by the substation design and supply conductor chain, and of course breaker settings in the substation, and any fuses there might be.
 
Last edited:

Bill57p9

Member
Joined
1 Dec 2019
Messages
589
Location
Ayrshire
If anyone has the money to bankroll an electrified preserved railway, could I suggest Penistone to Hadfield?
 

Top