221129
Established Member
They can't. That's the point. Lack of stock, crew and paths.Why not keep the Paignton services as they are and still have the half hourly Birmingham to Exeter, whats stopping them?
They can't. That's the point. Lack of stock, crew and paths.Why not keep the Paignton services as they are and still have the half hourly Birmingham to Exeter, whats stopping them?
Keep dreaming.Well lack of stock they are prepared to hire. Will be some HSTs going spare soon.
They can't. That's the point. Lack of stock, crew and paths.
I dont think stock would be a problem as they could divert one of the Plymouth trains every four hours into Paignton but this would mean a 2 hour gap in between Plymouth services, or does everything have to go to Plymouth? Take summer Saturdays for example they have 2 hourly gaps in between the Plymouths so they can serve Torquay and Paignton.
Another point, why are XC proposing for these changes when right at the end of their franchise which ends next December?
Not going to happen. Paignton does not need the capacity normally.I dont think stock would be a problem as they could divert one of the Plymouth trains every four hours into Paignton but this would mean a 2 hour gap in between Plymouth services, or does everything have to go to Plymouth? Take summer Saturdays for example they have 2 hourly gaps in between the Plymouths so they can serve Torquay and Paignton.
Another point, why are XC proposing for these changes when right at the end of their franchise which ends next December?
1900 Glasgow Central to Newcastle will continue to York arriving 2235.
The current extension actually ends in Dec 2019. The proposals were announced at a time when the alterations would run for 2 years of the 3 year extension. But I'd suggest that as they had already been agreed with DfT beforehand they are likely to run on at least another year or even two into the next franchise period.Another point, why are XC proposing for these changes when right at the end of their franchise which ends next December?
Yup. It also perfectly fills a gap at 2136 in services from Newcastle to Durham, Darlington and York between 2114 (London KX) and 2155 (Manchester Airport).Oh that's useful. Helps fill the gap between the 1935 and the 2100 for passengers from Edinburgh wanting stations south of Newcastle.
Couldn’t they go as far as Bristol every hour with every two hours one extends to Paignton?They can't. That's the point. Lack of stock, crew and paths.
Isn't that what they do now, and XC want to go half hourly to Exeter instead?Couldn’t they go as far as Bristol every hour with every two hours one extends to Paignton?
Exactly. And it's not just XC that wants it to happen.Isn't that what they do now, and XC want to go half hourly to Exeter instead?
Years ago on summer Saturday's from Torbay and on Friday nights and Saturdays to Torbay there were at leat 40 extra cross country trains. All with 12 coaches as a minimum. Such was the demand that relief train ran to support the Saturday extras.Not going to happen. Paignton does not need the capacity normally.
Where did these passengers go to?
They were deliberately weaned off travelling in the run up to privatisation.
Where did these passengers go to?
Crosscountry have only very rarely hired their HST sets or power cars out to other operators, and typically only for a day at a time, perhaps two at a stretch.They can make more by hiring out to other TOC.
Years ago on summer Saturday's from Torbay and on Friday nights and Saturdays to Torbay there were at leat 40 extra cross country trains. All with 12 coaches as a minimum. Such was the demand that relief train ran to support the Saturday extras.
These trains ran full all summer. Where did these passengers go to?
They were deliberately weaned off travelling in the run up to privatisation
35 years ago rail fares were reasonable and were not rising year after year so now all them passengers have been forced onto the motorwayYears ago on summer Saturday's from Torbay and on Friday nights and Saturdays to Torbay there were at leat 40 extra cross country trains. All with 12 coaches as a minimum. Such was the demand that relief train ran to support the Saturday extras.
These trains ran full all summer. Where did these passengers go to?
They were deliberately weaned off travelling in the run up to privatisation. Franchise holders don't want to run these trains due to the necessity of maintaining spare stock in the week. They were never interested in this kind of railway. So the whole summer Saturday's service was deliberate trun down to almost nothing so that investing in a franchise was more attractive and profits could be maximised.
Profits before people again.
Arriva have allowed their HST fleet to remain largely idle over the years. They can make more by hiring out to other TOC. Why has it taken all this time for them to use the hst fleet properly.
I feel sorry for people who travel like cattle on their voyagers. They are appalling and unfit for the purpose intended.
Four XCs a day to Paignton isn't needed.
However a selected service including a late morning departure from Paignton (c. 11.00) and a mid-afternoon arrival (c. 15.00), at least as far as the Midlands, ties in nicely with check-out and check-in times for this important leisure, tourism and conference destination where there is virtually year-round demand. Direct services for at least this market segment are important to an area whose economy relies heavily on tourism.
It’s wider than just that. Compare all the hotels and holiday accommodation advertising in Torbay 35 years ago and see how many are still running today. Many of the holiday camps which were thriving when my wife was growing up are now housing estates.
The vast majority of Birmingham commuters would be happy with a doubled up Voyager through New Street during the peak in connection with a daily Paignton train, as it'd mean they could all (probably) get a seat. It's only those of us in the know who specifically prefer HSTs, and I recognise that we're a bit of a special case. There's sufficient opportunity between the current daily HST diagrams to accommodate such an out and back working, and there may be greater flexibility in the HST diagrams once their depot moves south out of Scotland (Although conversely they'll also have more daily diagrams to work around).If there was a convenient NE>SW service passing through Birmingham southbound in the morning peak that required a Double Voyager to meet demand, that would probably be a convenient way of providing a mid-morning service at Paignton in marginal time (splitting at Exeter/Newton Abbot)
Vice-versa for a northbound evening peak Double Voyager working through Birmingham would be ideal to provide an afternoon service at Paignton in marginal time.
Trouble is the actual services at these times I believe correspond roughly to the current booked HST workings (so splits and joins are obviously out!). The HST workings also correspond to their maintenance regime, so cannot 'just' be moved to other duties.
So do people prefer HSTs on XC, *or* a through service to Paignton (not both...)