Rail users told to sit on floor 'for safety'

Discussion in 'UK Railway Discussion' started by bengolding, 30 Oct 2011.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. bengolding

    bengolding Member

    Messages:
    674
    Joined:
    31 Aug 2008
    Clearly a lack of news led to Friday's Evening Standard to report this drabble from an over zealous Virgin TM:

    3 errors:
    - This would have been the 10:48 from Liverpool toEuston.
    - The cable theft did not happen in Cheshire but in Warwickshire.
    - Pendolinos are not the fastest trains in the UK!

    http://www.gulf-times.com/site/topi...=467053&version=1&template_id=38&parent_id=20

    Shocked passengers were told to sit on the floor for their own safety as their train sped from London at up to 125mph (200kph).
    The 10.48 Pendolino from Euston to Liverpool was more crowded than usual with 600 passengers on board. Dozens were standing in the aisles when the train manager told them they would be travelling fast to make up for lost time and those standing should sit on the floor for “health and safety reasons”.
    Passenger Tony Bethel, 48, said: “They said that the train was diverted, then that it would go the usual route. When they told us to sit on the floor, it was the last straw.”
    Pendolinos, the fastest trains in the UK, have a tilting mechanism which allows them to travel around bends on the track without slowing down. Virgin Trains services suffered delays and overcrowding because of the theft of signal cables in the Cheshire area.
    A spokesman yesterday denied that passengers had been put in danger. He said: “There was absolutely no safety issue involved. We are investigating reports that an instruction was given for passengers to sit on the floor.”
    A senior source said the manager may have been a “little over enthusiastic” with his instruction.
     
  2. Registered users do not see these banners - join or log in today!

    Rail Forums

     
  3. Tracked

    Tracked Member

    Messages:
    667
    Joined:
    30 May 2011
    Location:
    53.5440°N 1.1510°W
    "Fast Train in Travelling Fast Shocker" :|
     
  4. rail-britain

    rail-britain Established Member

    Messages:
    4,105
    Joined:
    12 Aug 2007
    I remember hearing a similar announcement on a busy service
    "In the interests of comfort and safety, passengers without a seat may prefer sitting on the floor between stations"
    That was about 2006 just after the Class 390 were introduced on all routes
     
  5. Paul Sidorczuk

    Paul Sidorczuk Veteran Member

    Messages:
    24,374
    Joined:
    17 Apr 2011
    Location:
    The very best part of rural Cheshire East.
    If, for an example, an accident had occurred, would it be better if those passengers who travel where no seats are available or reserved, to be in a standing position or in a floor-sitting position at that time. Have any tests to that effect ever been carried out in test-centre facilities?
     
  6. MidnightFlyer

    MidnightFlyer Veteran Member

    Messages:
    12,733
    Joined:
    16 May 2010
    I suspect standing up and wedged solid. I believe that is the reason so many survived the Cannon St crash (that's according to the relevant investigations etc).
     
    Last edited: 30 Oct 2011
  7. AlterEgo

    AlterEgo Established Member

    Messages:
    10,929
    Joined:
    30 Dec 2008
    Location:
    Milton Keynes
    Do you mean the Cannon Street crash?

    I'm astonished someone could die in a 15mph crash.
     
  8. MidnightFlyer

    MidnightFlyer Veteran Member

    Messages:
    12,733
    Joined:
    16 May 2010
    Indeed, edited. I always get those two mixed up :oops:

    I personally thought that too, but that is what I have heard was said by official sources.
     
  9. rail-britain

    rail-britain Established Member

    Messages:
    4,105
    Joined:
    12 Aug 2007
    A lot of factors to take into account (impact, roll, deviation, etc)
    I am quite sure tests will have taken place and this will determine the positioning of structures and equipment, as well as the material they are constructed from
    With a rapid deceleration I doubt it will make any difference whether standing or sitting
     
  10. 150222

    150222 Member

    Messages:
    1,002
    Joined:
    9 Jul 2011
    It was mainly due to the age and poor-crashworthyness of the stock involved
     
  11. AlterEgo

    AlterEgo Established Member

    Messages:
    10,929
    Joined:
    30 Dec 2008
    Location:
    Milton Keynes
    Yes, but still, 15mph is quite extraordinary. Someone died in a 15mph collision. How? (The report does not elaborate).
     
  12. rail-britain

    rail-britain Established Member

    Messages:
    4,105
    Joined:
    12 Aug 2007
    From memory didn't this person have a pre-existing medical condition and died as an indirect result
    It had been proven had the accident not happened they would still be alive
    The report clearly does not state they died from their injuries, so presumably they were alive at the scene and after the accident
     
  13. GB

    GB Established Member

    Messages:
    5,165
    Joined:
    16 Nov 2008
    Location:
    Somewhere
    15mph in those days is actually quite alot given the mass involved and poor design and would be more than enough to allow someone to lose balance and hit their head.
     
  14. millemille

    millemille Member

    Messages:
    164
    Joined:
    28 Jul 2011
    No anti-climber on the inter-vehicle buffer positions meant that the carriages rode up over each other. The poor structural integrity of the 400's design, their age leading to degradation due to corrosion of the already poor structural strength and the fact that many of the doors were already open meant that the carriages were effectively decapitated as each coach rode up and over the preceding one with the resultant injuries and death to those inside.

    http://www.google.co.uk/imgres?q=ca...art=0&ndsp=25&ved=1t:429,r:0,s:0&tx=106&ty=76
     
  15. Peter Mugridge

    Peter Mugridge Established Member

    Messages:
    9,154
    Joined:
    8 Apr 2010
    Location:
    Epsom
    But there was a virtually identical buffer stop collision at the same sort of speed with the same type of stock at Victoria only a couple of years earlier in which far less damage was done, so there could well have been another factor in play at Cannon Street.

    Obvious possibilities include whether the stock was straight on at Victoria or on a slight curve at Cannon Street and whether or not the bodyshells were in poorer condition at Cannon Street ( remembering that by then the EPBs were on the way out ).

    Does anyone know the exact reasons for the different consequences?
     
  16. ChrisCooper

    ChrisCooper Established Member

    Messages:
    1,787
    Joined:
    7 Sep 2005
    Location:
    Loughborough
    Was it the same stock though? The stock at Cannon Street was SR stock, not BR Mk1s, the latter which brought great improvements in crashworthness and safety in general (something sadly forgotten). Had it been actual Mk1s at Cannon Street the chances are it would have been much less serious, infact Mk1s have been involved in low speed buffer stop collisions before and since that have not been fatal.

    One problem with any collision though is that humans can be very fragile. A bang to the head or chest can easily be fatal, particularly if combined with underlying conditions. Just a fall from standing and hitting a hard surface can kill. Hitting something "sharp" just makes things worse.
     
  17. swt_passenger

    swt_passenger Veteran Member

    Messages:
    17,111
    Joined:
    7 Apr 2010
  18. ChrisCooper

    ChrisCooper Established Member

    Messages:
    1,787
    Joined:
    7 Sep 2005
    Location:
    Loughborough
    The vehicles that suffered worst were the pre-Mk1 SR designs though, these were where the overriding took place.
     
  19. exile

    exile Established Member

    Messages:
    1,297
    Joined:
    16 Jul 2011
    15mph is the speed one would attain when falling from 8 feet up a ladder. Could easily kill you.
     
  20. TUC

    TUC Established Member

    Messages:
    1,836
    Joined:
    11 Nov 2010
    There's a more fundamental point here. Just what is it in a member of train staff's attitude that makes them think its OK to tell adults to sit on the floor?
     
  21. ralphchadkirk

    ralphchadkirk Established Member

    Messages:
    5,758
    Joined:
    20 Oct 2008
    Location:
    Hatfield or Surrey
    Probably byelaw 12(2):
    If the TM truly believed that it was safer for people to sit on the floor rather than stand, then anyone who disobeys such an instruction is in breach of bylaws. Of course "good cause" could be taken to mean that someone can disobey a instruction which is plainly silly, but I doubt that would be the interpretation taken.
     
  22. TUC

    TUC Established Member

    Messages:
    1,836
    Joined:
    11 Nov 2010
    But to work in reality that still has to be based on reasonable judgement by the train staff member. Most train staff will have seen plenty of crowded trains. If no one else has asked passengers to sit on the floor in other crowded trains. common sense should cause the staff member in this case to know it isn't necessary.
     
  23. Hydro

    Hydro Established Member

    Messages:
    2,202
    Joined:
    5 Mar 2007
    Not all trains tilt, however. This may have been what the TM took into consideration when making the (possibly overzealous) announcement.
     
  24. exile

    exile Established Member

    Messages:
    1,297
    Joined:
    16 Jul 2011
    I'd prefer to sit on the floor than to stand for a long period.
     
  25. AlterEgo

    AlterEgo Established Member

    Messages:
    10,929
    Joined:
    30 Dec 2008
    Location:
    Milton Keynes
    It was obviously well intentioned, so it's a moot point surely.
     
  26. bluenoxid

    bluenoxid Established Member

    Messages:
    1,854
    Joined:
    9 Feb 2008
    People say the stupidest of things with good intentions. The road to hell is paved with them.
     
  27. TUC

    TUC Established Member

    Messages:
    1,836
    Joined:
    11 Nov 2010
    But you assume that train staff have a modicm of common sense.
     
  28. bluenoxid

    bluenoxid Established Member

    Messages:
    1,854
    Joined:
    9 Feb 2008
    Do I? Not wanting to slate any staff in another industry, this has come from somewhere and the logic is there.

    Intelligence and common sense do not equal the same thing.
     
  29. Paul Sidorczuk

    Paul Sidorczuk Veteran Member

    Messages:
    24,374
    Joined:
    17 Apr 2011
    Location:
    The very best part of rural Cheshire East.
    Looking at some of the units that I have travelled upon, from a "floor cleanliness" point of view, there are some services that I would never choose to sit on a floor upon for both health and clothes reasons.
     
  30. Schnellzug

    Schnellzug Established Member

    Messages:
    2,926
    Joined:
    22 Aug 2011
    Location:
    Evercreech Junction
    So what was the reasoning for this? "We're going to go faster than authorised round the curves, so hold on to your hats!!"? perhaps Management ought to have taken a slightly harder look than they did, if that was actually the case.
     
  31. asylumxl

    asylumxl Established Member

    Messages:
    4,259
    Joined:
    12 Feb 2009
    Location:
    Hiding in your shadow
    I imagine the train was just going to run to linespeed, as I would assume it would usually run slower with a good amount of padding in the timetable to allow this.

    I don't think it's all that stupid. Commuters are generally stupid and obnoxious. Half of them think they are at the peak of physical health, when in reality they run for the train bright red, huffing and puffing, drenched in sweat. They have no balance and fall all over the place when the train goes over the slightest bump or when the train rounds a bend. I fear for myself when they take the lid off their morning coffee...
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page