I did mention Colchester, but Simmons has the Cambridge line only open as far as Bishop Stortford before 1845, so I left it off my list.Well, you have got the railways pretty much right although missing out the Eastern Counties (Shoreditch to Cambridge and Colchester) but not the right target area.
That sounds remarkably like a circle line around London!It may help if I list the railways the N&SCR was to connect directly to:
Eastern Counties
Great Northern (which was not built but must have been in promotion as its Act was submitted the same year)
London & Birmingham
Great Western
London & Southampton
South Eastern
at 60 miles (so a circle a bit under 20 miles diameter) you are probably rightI did mention Colchester, but Simmons has the Cambridge line only open as far as Bishop Stortford before 1845, so I left it off my list.
That sounds remarkably like a circle line around London!
I did mention Colchester, but Simmons has the Cambridge line only open as far as Bishop Stortford before 1845, so I left it off my list.
That sounds remarkably like a circle line around London!
at 60 miles (so a circle a bit under 20 miles diameter) you are probably right
You are getting very warm. Just leave out one segment of the circle that might have been difficult in 1845 and move out a bit
Skipping the Thames estuary, then, would leave us with a C-shaped route. Was the "North and South" referring to either shore of the Thames?
It appears to have been an interesting enterprise, but my knowledge of outer-London geography wouldn't have been able to guess more than a couple of those.Looks like interest in this one has died so I will give the answer:
The Northern & Southern Connecting Railway's planned route was:
Open floor
- Hertford (Eastern Counties Railway)
- Hatfield/Welwyn (Great Northern Railway)
- Watford (London & Birmingham Railway)
- Langley (Great Western Railway)
- Weybridge (London & Southampton Railway)
- Reigate/Redhill (South Eastern Railway)
Indeed, very interesting, thanks!
Let's try this:
Knaresborough Viaduct is one of the more well known railway landmarks of North Yorkshire, but it was actually the second attempt!
So, collapse date of the first, and opening date of the second (just the year will do)?Bonus for the railway it was built for?
ThanksWell done @Efini92, all correct The project design floor is yours
I’ll give you that. The top number ( lowest figure ) applies to passenger trains. Normally it’s the bottom number ( highest figure ).It’s more usual to have the higher speed for multiple units not loco hauled
ie 25 over 10
The top part looks like what you would receive when you cancel an aws warning that doesn’t apply to you.
Correct.All I can think of is: "back in the day" -- approaching water-troughs ??
Indeed. But pipped at the troughWarning board for approaching water troughs, the actual sign for where to lower the scoop was the "X" on its own.
I recognise it from the BTF short film Elizabethan Express
Indeed. But pipped at the trough
@hexagon789: it would seem clear that you actually knew the significance of the sign. In my answer, I really thought -- particularly, with looking at the 'X' jigger which to me, meant nothing -- that the sign must be something from modern times, pertinent to post-steam forms of traction; and that I was playing the fool with my "water troughs" suggestion. What with these considerations, I think I should cede the floor to you. Please, you go ahead.
@hexagon789: truly, "prithee proceed"; to be honest, I find myself at present totally devoid of questions, anyway !
I have a feeling that no train has ever been recorded at 100mph in Ireland.