• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Railway Geography: Winners and Losers

Status
Not open for further replies.

Mikey C

Established Member
Joined
11 Feb 2013
Messages
6,851
Another example of a small place being on the right line is Haddenham which is on the Chiltern Main Line, and thus has Haddenham and Thame Parkway which serves the wider area. Thame has a larger population, but was on the closed Princes Risborough to Oxford line so people have to travel to Haddenham
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

stuu

Established Member
Joined
2 Sep 2011
Messages
2,762
As a loser I give you Abingdon. With a population just shy of 40,000, it used to have a branch line from Radley, but that closed under Beeching. Now the good folks of Abingdon tend to drive to Didcot Parkway if they are going anywhere long-distance.
A lesser candidate I give you Wantage and its satellite of Grove. Their joint population would be around 15,000, but the closure of Wantage Road station (in the parish of Grove) - also under Beeching - has deprived this area of rail transport - other than by going first to Didcot Parkway.
Most of Abingdon is no more than 3 miles from Radley Station though, there's plenty of urban areas where the station is a couple of miles away in the same town
 

YorksLad12

Established Member
Joined
5 Feb 2020
Messages
1,895
Location
Leeds
Wakefield is a winner. It's a large council area - but served well enough by stations, Castleford, Pontefract etc). Other than the city proper is around the same size as Halifax/Rochdale/Lincoln etc. It benefits from being in the way between Leeds and Doncaster and being just big enough to matter. In isolation it would never justify the levels of service or the multiplicity of routes.
Just up the line, Normanton was a winner but could now be considered a post-railway loser.
 

Graham H

Member
Joined
16 Apr 2018
Messages
321
As a loser I give you Abingdon. With a population just shy of 40,000, it used to have a branch line from Radley, but that closed under Beeching. Now the good folks of Abingdon tend to drive to Didcot Parkway if they are going anywhere long-distance.
A lesser candidate I give you Wantage and its satellite of Grove. Their joint population would be around 15,000, but the closure of Wantage Road station (in the parish of Grove) - also under Beeching - has deprived this area of rail transport - other than by going first to Didcot Parkway.
I always felt BR missed a trick when they reopened the line from Oxford to Bicester. That was about the same time as the Abingdon branch finally succumbed and I am sure an Abingdon to Bicester shuttle would have been a really useful way of effectively providing two services and avoiding terminal space at Oxford.
 

The Planner

Veteran Member
Joined
15 Apr 2008
Messages
15,953
Another example of a small place being on the right line is Haddenham which is on the Chiltern Main Line, and thus has Haddenham and Thame Parkway which serves the wider area. Thame has a larger population, but was on the closed Princes Risborough to Oxford line so people have to travel to Haddenham
Haddenham was a re-opening though, even if its slightly north of the original.
 

satisnek

Member
Joined
5 Sep 2014
Messages
889
Location
Kidderminster/Mercia Marina
I'm surprised that Aylesbury - which loses out big time - hasn't been mentioned, even though surrounding lines have been. It appears to be the largest town in the area between London and the Midlands which isn't on a main line and therefore has no service going north.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top