TheGrandWazoo
Veteran Member
Dales and District, absolutely pathetic even with their difficult to serve area. Where there is a comparable operation, at least the fares aren't quite so extortionate, I haven't actually used them in years.
That said, they seem to have given up on a lot of their work, many services lost to Hodgsons for a start in the Northallerton area, others taken over by NYCC directly, such as the 153.
When I lived in Thirsk, it cost almost as much for a return to Northallerton, and more for a return to Ripon on the 70 than it did for a return to York on the 30(x) with Reliance, who at least have reasonable fares if nothing else. I'd give Abbotts of Leeming an average rating for maintaining a useful service on the Northallerton to Stokesley route without a subsidy. Dales and District seem to have given up on all but the 73 Bedale to Northallerton when it comes to running a serious service.
Dales and District took on most of the Arriva services when Richmond depot closed. These were the 29, 30, 34, 70, 72 and 79 with numerous drivers moving across having taken redundancy (whilst D&D already operated stuff like the 55 and 159). All were operated under tender with the exception of the 73.
They subsequently lost some routes in the next tender rounds when they lost the 29 and 72 to Arriva and the 79 to Hodgsons. They then regained the 29 and 72 some years later. The latest losses to Hodgsons are again just the product of the tender round. The cuts that NYCC made to tenders led to either community minibuses or the use of NYCC welfare vehicles operated outside school workings in order to minimise costs. According to an FOI request from 2015/6, the 80/89 was tendered so I'd be surprised if it was commercial.
I do agree with you that Dales and District are perfunctory with their selection of dealer stock vehicles, logos applied to dealer white and rock hard seats.