Return 10p more than a single...why?

Discussion in 'Fares Advice & Policy' started by Minilad, 1 Jun 2019.

  1. Silverdale

    Silverdale Member

    Messages:
    523
    Joined:
    14 Apr 2018
    In my railway career I can remember many instances of that phrase being used. Quite often, the very thing referred to did happen.

    And on one or two occasions, I was the one that made it happen*.


    *In ways related to maintaining track. Nothing to do with fares.
     
  2. Silverdale

    Silverdale Member

    Messages:
    523
    Joined:
    14 Apr 2018
    Why would you need to do a search of the entire database each time a fare from Bletchley to London was requested. Surely, you do the search once, you know the results. Pop 'em in a file?

    You may need to install some discipline and not tinker with the fares database on a daily basis, though.


    They may opt to lower the price of Bletchley to London.

    If that's what the market dictates. Recalling that I'm not suggesting that full disclosure of fares should be required on the current fares structure, but on any proposed new fares structure, on the basis that it's "revenue neutral".
     
    Last edited: 6 Jun 2019
  3. yorkie

    yorkie Administrator Staff Member Administrator

    Messages:
    43,786
    Joined:
    6 Jun 2005
    Location:
    Yorkshire
    But you'd need to check every fare for every itinerary, wouldn't you?
    The fares and timetable databases do need to be checked every day, and I can't see that changing anytime soon!
    They will not.
    It isn't.

    The cost of BLY-EUS fares is not unaffordable or unreasonable, and there is absolutely no viable alternative transport available that would be anywhere near as good as West Midlands Trains offering, so why should they lower the fare in a market based pricing structure?
     
  4. sheff1

    sheff1 Established Member

    Messages:
    4,246
    Joined:
    24 Dec 2009
    Location:
    Sheffield
    In the specific example quoted there are various ways it could be eliminated.

    a) Railcard discounts could be removed from fares which included the hovercraft.
    b) Through tickets via the hovercraft could be withdrawn.
    c) Portsmouth could be allowed to sell hovercraft tickets
    d) Hovercraft alone could offer a railcard discount.

    Of course a) would not be welcomed by railcard holders, b) would be unwelcome to most people who book through tickets, whilst c) or d) would not be welcomed by Hovertravel.


    There is also a very easy (in technical terms) way to eliminate such things on UK rail-only journeys - introduce the sort of pricing structure which is used in various other countries. This would not be easy politically of course, and hence is not going to happen.

    I am content that I do understand how fares work and will continue to use that understanding to undercut the fares that UK TOCs would prefer me to pay :smile:.
     
  5. Silverdale

    Silverdale Member

    Messages:
    523
    Joined:
    14 Apr 2018
    Because as long as MKC-EUS undercuts BLY-EUS and their customers are aware of that, there will be abstraction from BLY-EUS. WM can either live with that loss of revenue, or adjust the fares accordingly. Either to the point where MKC-EUS does not undercut BLY-EUS, or to not differentiate and make the Bletchley fare the same as the Milton Keynes.

    Where fares allow starting/finishing short, that... is market pricing. Keeping the fact that MKC undercuts BLY under wraps, is not.

    By the way, if you were travelling tomorrow from Bletchley to London, what ticket would you be purchasing?
     
  6. sheff1

    sheff1 Established Member

    Messages:
    4,246
    Joined:
    24 Dec 2009
    Location:
    Sheffield
    Can you provide some examples of this "ideal market" in operation please - I am struggling to think of any.
     
  7. yorkie

    yorkie Administrator Staff Member Administrator

    Messages:
    43,786
    Joined:
    6 Jun 2005
    Location:
    Yorkshire
    As hardly anyone is going to know about it, and any price difference is negligible, any loss of revenue is very minor.

    But your proposals would see far bigger problems, as there is the cost of implementing it (which would have ongoing costs due to exponential increases in computing power required in fares calculations) and the fact that everyone would be offered cheaper fares, even when the fare was priced by a different operator over which they had no control.

    With a few exceptions, fares don't tend to reduce. People will always be able to find examples where they have gone down but they are very much in the minority.
    Market based pricing is charging more for less if people are prepared to pay for it.

    This doesn't just apply to transport costs, but to tangible things like bottles of water.
    I don't see how pricing each of these fares according to their respective markets is "not" market based pricing?!
    What time would I be travelling, and when would I be coming back?
     
  8. krus_aragon

    krus_aragon Established Member

    Messages:
    4,890
    Joined:
    10 Jun 2009
    Location:
    North Wales
    Would it have to be done in realtime? Or could it just be recalculated when the fares database (or routeing guide) changes?
     
  9. Silverdale

    Silverdale Member

    Messages:
    523
    Joined:
    14 Apr 2018
    The market in ideal gas is ideal.... I think.
     
  10. yorkie

    yorkie Administrator Staff Member Administrator

    Messages:
    43,786
    Joined:
    6 Jun 2005
    Location:
    Yorkshire
    It could be done each night, but each fare has to be checked against an itinerary surely, to check that the fare is valid for that itinerary, so that's a lot of processing.

    There are over two and a half thousand stations on the network, and many of them would have numerous potential journey opportunities between them. That's a lot of itineraries and a lot of fares.
     
  11. Silverdale

    Silverdale Member

    Messages:
    523
    Joined:
    14 Apr 2018
    Where a MKC ticket can be used to travel from BLY, which starting/finishing short allows, they aren't separate markets. They only behave as separate markets if you don't reveal to the potential BLY customer that they can use an MKC fare and that (having done a search of the entire fares database to check) it's cheaper.

    But you are pushing me away from the main point I'm seeking to make which is that whatever system of fares exists, market priced, or set by statute, it's objectively fairer if all potential customers have access to (which means being told, when they ask) all fares available for the journey they want to make, even if they make use of a combination of tickets and/or starting/finishing short.

    It just so happens that doing that in a market pricing system would also make the market itself function better.

    I only asked about what ticket you would choose, so that I could then ask you how long it took to search the entire fares database to decide which was the right one. 8-)
     
  12. sheff1

    sheff1 Established Member

    Messages:
    4,246
    Joined:
    24 Dec 2009
    Location:
    Sheffield
    Sorry, I do not know what "ideal gas" is.
     
  13. Silverdale

    Silverdale Member

    Messages:
    523
    Joined:
    14 Apr 2018
    In Physics, the 'gas laws' apply to an 'ideal gas'. One in which the individual molecules occupy no space and can't collide with each other. Needless to say, there is no actual gas which has such properties, but the laws still work approximately for an actual gas. Well enough.
     
  14. Silverdale

    Silverdale Member

    Messages:
    523
    Joined:
    14 Apr 2018
    It's only market based if people have access to all of the market. Telling people that what you're offering is the cheapest fare, when you are offering an even cheaper fare - that they could use - to others, is distorting the market.

    Charging people more for a through fare than for a combination of fares, by not offering the combination, is also distorting the market. Not only do you see that, in relation to split ticketing, but you don't miss any opportunity to promote the split ticketing sites which reveal the fares.

    You're going to have to do more to convince me that offering fares requiring starting/finishing short would be materially different in application and effect to split ticketing. As I see it they are just different ways of slicing an dicing the fares in the database to find a solution which the customer can use. Often the best value can be found with a combination of splitting tickets and starting and/or stopping short. If one is ok, why is the other taboo?
     

Share This Page