• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Ridiculous journey on GWR

Status
Not open for further replies.

MikeWh

Established Member
Associate Staff
Senior Fares Advisor
Joined
15 Jun 2010
Messages
7,870
Location
Crayford
I've just been trying to help my mum with a journey on 17th July from Westbury to Longfield. She has the return portion of a Longfield to Westbury route Newbury super off-peak return. The earliest journey NRE says she can make takes her:

Westbury > Bath > Didcot > Newbury (bus) > Theale (bus) > Reading > Paddington, then as expected.

Given that the train from Bath to Didcot ends up at Paddington and the overall journey is already extended, surely it should be allowed to stay on that train. GWR customer services say she will probably be ok to stay on the first train, especially as she has a senior railcard, but surely NRE should have some easements in place to avoid such ridiculous routings.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

sheff1

Established Member
Joined
24 Dec 2009
Messages
5,484
Location
Sheffield
Of course they should.

It seems someone has attempted to introduce a routeing easement (700785) but has not worded it correctly as it only refers to journeys to Reading and Paddington rather than via Reading and Paddington.

"During engineering works between 04-07 June 2018, 09-12 July 2018, 16 July to 05 August 2018, 08-11 October 2018 and 19-22 November 2018, journeys from Warminster, Frome, Dilton Marsh and Westbury to Reading and London Paddington priced on fare route (00063) VIA NEWBURY are permitted on journeys via Swindon. This fare route easement applies in both directions".
 

Haywain

Veteran Member
Joined
3 Feb 2013
Messages
15,115
I think the problem could be that if you ask any journey planner for a journey from A to C via B (B in this example being Newbury), they will route you via B regardless of any easements that apply to a ticket already purchased. This is one of those cases where journey planners are just not smart enough to interpret the requirements of the request and try to give you a two legged journey rather than a journey using a "ticket route". To do so correctly they really need an option to input the details of a ticket already held, but I can see that being fraught with problems!
 

MikeWh

Established Member
Associate Staff
Senior Fares Advisor
Joined
15 Jun 2010
Messages
7,870
Location
Crayford
Thanks both. The easement looks a good reason to allow travel from Bath to London direct. And Haywain does appear to be correct because if I put in the same journey from Paddington to Westbury for the same dates, it still routes the return via two buses to get to Newbury.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top