7522
Member
- Joined
- 28 Dec 2018
- Messages
- 196
No WiFi on my classic HST from Inverness either this evening (the 15:54 to Edinburgh) and also the disabled toilet was out of order but other than that it was a much better experience than a 170. The lack of underfloor engines is a big advantage and also the end doors.
Interior is a bit tired but was still comfortable.
I imagine the conductors don't like the slam doors though obviously due to dwell times but also because of people potebtially leaning out of windows. Our conductor had to give a strong reminder to a passenger doing this on board.
The HST's are much nicer than the 170's so would be disappointing to see the project abandoned. 158's are actually quite nice on these routes too as they have a good seating layout with plenty of tables and proximity to windows. The 158's also have a good interior with nice seats, reliable WiFi and USB charging. The lack of first class and underfloor engines does though make the HST have the edge over a 158.
Edit: and also 158's would need to be doubled up for capacity reasons.
Interior is a bit tired but was still comfortable.
I imagine the conductors don't like the slam doors though obviously due to dwell times but also because of people potebtially leaning out of windows. Our conductor had to give a strong reminder to a passenger doing this on board.
The HST's are much nicer than the 170's so would be disappointing to see the project abandoned. 158's are actually quite nice on these routes too as they have a good seating layout with plenty of tables and proximity to windows. The 158's also have a good interior with nice seats, reliable WiFi and USB charging. The lack of first class and underfloor engines does though make the HST have the edge over a 158.
Edit: and also 158's would need to be doubled up for capacity reasons.
Last edited: