route:oxford
Established Member
- Joined
- 1 Nov 2008
- Messages
- 4,949
Railway Byelaw 6(2):
Does that mean torrid intimacy is prohibited in a sleeper cabin?
Railway Byelaw 6(2):
Well you know. Share and share alike !!
I didn't know till they come out. For all I know it could have been Susan Boyle in there
No, they were not a safe environment to travel in.Pity there are no longer any non-corridor compartment coaches ?
No, they were not a safe environment to travel in.
Perception of some rather than reality. Did you ever see a report from the BTP saying crime was higher?
There were some very serious incidents and I'd rather not subject anyone to the possibility of them occuring regardless of how rare they may be.Perception of some rather than reality. Did you ever see a report from the BTP saying crime was higher?
Perception of some rather than reality. Did you ever see a report from the BTP saying crime was higher?
If is like all these parents driving kids to school because it is unsafe to walk!
Yes, there were, and some quite nasty murders as well.Weren't there a few murders and rapes in non-corridor stock?
I know the government/police guidelines for seeing 2 people in the act in a public place is to ignore it, try not to look and move it..so ideally should be the same concept here
Yes, there were, and some quite nasty murders as well.
A particulary bad one on an Orpington - London service with a 4EPB one afternoon , and in the last days of this stock , attempts were made to keep them off off peak services , and a red stripe (nowt to do with refreshment facilities) applied to highlight the non corridor compartments.
Not a joke , as you never knew (a) what you would find in those compartments (b) who you would end up meeting in them
The Victorians had concern about them , never mind the recent past.
(a good number of suburban workings from the 1970's had them removed - the condition of the 501 sets on the Euston/Watford and NLL services before the compartments were opened up to saloons proved this - never have I seen such vandalism bar the NYC subway in its lowest years)
Didn't realise it was that bad, makes you wonder why the 442s had then as built.
I'd have let them carry on.
But if they lit up a post-coital fag, I would have thrown the book at them. Disgusting behaviour.
It seems the general opinion was I was right then. Did feel bad at the time for spoiling their fun. The girl was pretty hot though. Wouldn't have minded a go myself !!
If it had been me on that train walking past, I'd have had a wry smile on my face and not bothered doing anything about it, and if with mates tell them and let it spread around the carriage
If is like all these parents driving kids to school because it is unsafe to walk!
So my question is. Right or wrong. Should I have just let them carry on. Or was I right to put a stop to it
The 442s had corridor compartments though, which are much safer as you could always move down the train to a different compartment. The 4-EPBs had non-corridor compartments, so once you were in a compartment the only way to move to a different one is outside of the train whilst it's stopped at a station.
Pity there are no longer any non-corridor compartment coaches ?
I thought Europeans were liberal about intimacy. I didn't expect this to be a big deal.