• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Should Bus Travel be Free

ikcdab

Member
Joined
3 Feb 2012
Messages
355
Location
Cogload Junction
Moderator Note - split from:

To be honest, it's about time all local bus journeys were free or only a nominal charge. If they really are serious about reducing pollution then the ULEZ zone charges should be increased and bus fares reduced. It's the easiest way to reduce traffic.
In my own part of the country we have had £1 flat rate fares. This has been so successful that guess what... The flat fare is being increased to £2. How to kill a good thing.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Joined
1 Nov 2021
Messages
172
Location
Berwick
To be honest, it's about time all local bus journeys were free or only a nominal charge. If they really are serious about reducing pollution then the ULEZ zone charges should be increased and bus fares reduced. It's the easiest way to reduce traffic.
In my own part of the country we have had £1 flat rate fares. This has been so successful that guess what... The flat fare is being increased to £2. How to kill a good thing.
Why should London have free bus fares? The rest of the country do not. Simply those who fail to pay their fare should be taken to task as should those who fail to pay their rail fare.
 

FenMan

Established Member
Joined
13 Oct 2011
Messages
1,444
To be honest, it's about time all local bus journeys were free or only a nominal charge. If they really are serious about reducing pollution then the ULEZ zone charges should be increased and bus fares reduced. It's the easiest way to reduce traffic.
In my own part of the country we have had £1 flat rate fares. This has been so successful that guess what... The flat fare is being increased to £2. How to kill a good thing.

For large parts of the country having a bus service at all would be a start.
 

fandroid

Established Member
Joined
9 Nov 2014
Messages
1,844
Location
Hampshire
Why should London have free bus fares? The rest of the country do not. Simply those who fail to pay their fare should be taken to task as should those who fail to pay their rail fare.
If London paid for free bus travel via the Council Tax, as it already does for Freedom Passes, then it's entirely up to London to do it. Fare policies in the rest of the country are irrelevant.
 

Wolfie

Established Member
Joined
17 Aug 2010
Messages
6,791
If London paid for free bus travel via the Council Tax, as it already does for Freedom Passes, then it's entirely up to London to do it. Fare policies in the rest of the country are irrelevant.
As a Londoner l would be happy for people who live here to get free travel paid for by Council Tax. People from the rest of the country though? Hell no! Why should l pay for their bus ride?
 

MrJeeves

Established Member
Associate Staff
Senior Fares Advisor
Joined
28 Aug 2015
Messages
2,888
Location
Burgess Hill
People from the rest of the country though? Hell no! Why should l pay for their bus ride?
Why should tourists make use of the same government rail subsidy that we pay for in taxes?!?!

Because they help to fund your economy...
 
Joined
1 Nov 2021
Messages
172
Location
Berwick
If London paid for free bus travel via the Council Tax, as it already does for Freedom Passes, then it's entirely up to London to do it. Fare policies in the rest of the country are irrelevant.
Does London Council tax actually pay the whole cost of running TFL or do we tax payers help out too?
 

TheSel

Member
Joined
10 Oct 2017
Messages
914
Location
Southport, Merseyside
To be honest, it's about time all local bus journeys were free or only a nominal charge. If they really are serious about reducing pollution then the ULEZ zone charges should be increased and bus fares reduced. It's the easiest way to reduce traffic.
In my own part of the country we have had £1 flat rate fares. This has been so successful that guess what... The flat fare is being increased to £2. How to kill a good thing.
Yet another attack on pensioners and on one of the few remaining perks of having an ENCTS pass.

ENCTS has already been significantly devalued. Pass holders used to save £5 and more per journey. Now cut to a £2 saving. Diabolical.
 

ikcdab

Member
Joined
3 Feb 2012
Messages
355
Location
Cogload Junction
Why should London have free bus fares? The rest of the country do not. Simply those who fail to pay their fare should be taken to task as should those who fail to pay their rail fare.
I meant that all local bus fares should be free or a nominal sum. If we are really serious about reducing car usage, and local usage is the most damaging, then all local buses should be free and funded through local taxation of some sort.
Back in 2017 I visited Kiev. The metro there was a flat rate of 5 HR which is about 10p. And it was busy with very few cars. Mind you, that probably reflects more the local economy rather than a drive to reduce cars on the road.
 

Benjwri

Established Member
Joined
16 Jan 2022
Messages
2,294
Location
Bath
I think it’s worth thinking about all the other issues in London first. There are a significant amount of other things that money should be spent on before we start making buses free, which is a significant undertaking and pretty much unheard of across the country.
Does London Council tax actually pay the whole cost of running TFL or do we tax payers help out too?
The government has contributed limited funds to TfL since Covid. The level of funding is similar or lower when population is accounted for to the rest of the countries transport systems.
I hope this dog in a manger comment is ironic!
I would hope so, although a sentiment I have heard before. The idea that other people shouldn’t get a good thing because it would seem less exclusive to those that have it is ridiculous, given others having it doesn’t affect them at all.
 

TheSel

Member
Joined
10 Oct 2017
Messages
914
Location
Southport, Merseyside
The idea that other people shouldn’t get a good thing because it would seem less exclusive to those that have it is ridiculous, given others having it doesn’t affect them at all.
Slightly off topic perhaps, but does that argument work with respect to staff travel passes? A travelling Revenue Protection Officer, for example, presumably is not paying for the journey on which they "catch" a fare dodger. Just saying!
 

Benjwri

Established Member
Joined
16 Jan 2022
Messages
2,294
Location
Bath
Slightly off topic perhaps, but does that argument work with respect to staff travel passes? A travelling Revenue Protection Officer, for example, presumably is not paying for the journey on which they "catch" a fare dodger. Just saying!
They are paying, in my opinion, for staff travel facilities in that they are a perk of the job and therefore potentially in lieu of a higher wage.
 

Wolfie

Established Member
Joined
17 Aug 2010
Messages
6,791
Slightly off topic perhaps, but does that argument work with respect to staff travel passes? A travelling Revenue Protection Officer, for example, presumably is not paying for the journey on which they "catch" a fare dodger. Just saying!
The Revenue Protection Officer in your example is doing his job so why would he be expected to pay to do so? What next? A proposal that the driver and guard have to buy tickets for the train they are working?

I am assuming that you were joking - if not you really hadn't thought it through!
 

HullRailMan

Member
Joined
8 Oct 2018
Messages
424
I think it’s worth thinking about all the other issues in London first. There are a significant amount of other things that money should be spent on before we start making buses free, which is a significant undertaking and pretty much unheard of across the country.

The government has contributed limited funds to TfL since Covid. The level of funding is similar or lower when population is accounted for to the rest of the countries transport systems.

I would hope so, although a sentiment I have heard before. The idea that other people shouldn’t get a good thing because it would seem less exclusive to those that have it is ridiculous, given others having it doesn’t affect them at all.
Central government produced £1.2bn to TfL in the last funding period. Is that what you call ‘limited’?

 

Wolfie

Established Member
Joined
17 Aug 2010
Messages
6,791

Benjwri

Established Member
Joined
16 Jan 2022
Messages
2,294
Location
Bath
Central government produced £1.2bn to TfL in the last funding period. Is that what you call ‘limited’?

As mentioned by @Wolfie you ignored where I said when population is taken into account. In 2023 TfL had an operating surplus, government money is spent on upgrades such as new Piccadilly Line trains. The actual day to day service is not funded by the government.
This will mean that TfL will achieve an overall operating surplus of £79m, which will then be reinvested directly into enhancements across the transport network as part of TfL's wider £2bn capital programme as outlined in its Business Plan, with any government funding in 2023/24 allocated to fund capital investments across the network.
 

Djgr

Established Member
Joined
30 Jul 2018
Messages
2,009
I meant that all local bus fares should be free or a nominal sum. If we are really serious about reducing car usage, and local usage is the most damaging, then all local buses should be free and funded through local taxation of some sort.
Back in 2017 I visited Kiev. The metro there was a flat rate of 5 HR which is about 10p. And it was busy with very few cars. Mind you, that probably reflects more the local economy rather than a drive to reduce cars on the road.
Free is much better than nominal because with one step you remove a whole load of non-productive costs.

Ticket selling, ticket checking, prosecution. You also remove a lot of idle time when the driver could actually be driving.
 

A0wen

On Moderation
Joined
19 Jan 2008
Messages
7,747
Moderator Note - split from:

To be honest, it's about time all local bus journeys were free or only a nominal charge. If they really are serious about reducing pollution then the ULEZ zone charges should be increased and bus fares reduced. It's the easiest way to reduce traffic.
In my own part of the country we have had £1 flat rate fares. This has been so successful that guess what... The flat fare is being increased to £2. How to kill a good thing.

Why should some people be subsidised to travel ?

If you want to peddle the green agenda you need to discourage travel period, except by walking or cycling.
 

miklcct

On Moderation
Joined
2 May 2021
Messages
4,907
Location
Cricklewood
I don't agree buses should be free. They should be as cheap as the break even level for the whole network.

Buses in Hong Kong are cheap but the aim is to make a profit on a network level basis. This is done by aggressive route planning with the aim to carry as many people on a bus as possible to run them fast to the destination.

It was a shame that the M4 bus lane wasn't aggressively used by TfL to run premium express commuter buses from the whole of West London to warrant its existence.
 

HSTEd

Veteran Member
Joined
14 Jul 2011
Messages
18,064
As the bus statistics indicate, the state already pays a large fraction of the cost of operating the bus industry.

In England, bus industry revenue is ~£5.54bn, of which only £3.12bn is actually fares. The rest is various forms of governmetn support, including concessionary travel passes paid for by the state.

The actual cost of eliminating bus fares would likely be less than this because there would be major operational savings from eliminating revenue protection requirements.
Buses could practically use multiple doors, load and unload faster and all the ancillary costs would be eliminated.

Considering the bus driver wage bill is ~£2.3bn, even modest improvements in bus driver productivity would yield significant savings.
 
Last edited:

6Gman

Established Member
Joined
1 May 2012
Messages
8,664
One fundamental question about "free" bus travel.

How would the level of service be determined?
 

mangyiscute

Established Member
Joined
6 Mar 2021
Messages
1,462
Location
Reading
Can I suggest that rather than making it free for absolutely everyone, we follow in Scotlands path and make it free for youngsters to encourage travel for those who can't use a car?
I would also suggest a system by which anyone who doesn't own a car gets free bus travel, but this may be harder to implement. Perhaps anyone who doesn't have a valid drivers licence.
Ensuring those who can't drive can still travel is super important, and this is one way to target it.
 

ikcdab

Member
Joined
3 Feb 2012
Messages
355
Location
Cogload Junction
Can I suggest that rather than making it free for absolutely everyone, we follow in Scotlands path and make it free for youngsters to encourage travel for those who can't use a car?
I would also suggest a system by which anyone who doesn't own a car gets free bus travel, but this may be harder to implement. Perhaps anyone who doesn't have a valid drivers licence.
Ensuring those who can't drive can still travel is super important, and this is one way to target it.
That may well help disadvantaged people, but it does nothing to get cars off the road and people using buses instead. I want to be able to stop using my car and I would be encouraged hugely by free or very low bus fares.
 

TheSel

Member
Joined
10 Oct 2017
Messages
914
Location
Southport, Merseyside
By demand, just as it is now. Unpopular routes have service reduced, popular routes have service enhanced.
Popularity has the square root of diddly-squat to do with social necessity.

A route passing a remote point where Mr or Mrs Bloggs needs to visit the shops / dentist / doctor (etc) is just as (or more) important than one taking half a dozen punters on a day out to enjoy the scenery.

... I want to be able to stop using my car ...
There's a way of doing that. Stop using your car!

OK - somewhat tongue in cheek. But there's always a way. It may mean a change in your lifestyle. Maybe one you don't wish / can't afford to make.

But everything is possible. At a price.
 

dk1

Veteran Member
Joined
2 Oct 2009
Messages
17,243
Location
East Anglia
£1 bus fares minimum for short central journeys yes I agree but how do you enforce it especially when changing drivers? Nothing should be totally free in life and even my 80 year old mum has said for 15 odd years she’d be happy to pay a minimum 50p per trip.
 

HSTEd

Veteran Member
Joined
14 Jul 2011
Messages
18,064
Can I suggest that rather than making it free for absolutely everyone, we follow in Scotlands path and make it free for youngsters to encourage travel for those who can't use a car?
I would also suggest a system by which anyone who doesn't own a car gets free bus travel, but this may be harder to implement. Perhaps anyone who doesn't have a valid drivers licence.
Ensuring those who can't drive can still travel is super important, and this is one way to target it.
The problem with targeting is that it would still require the existing payment infrastructure to be maintained, along with all the operational headaches that it causes.
I'm not convinced it is worth the effort.

£1 bus fares minimum for short central journeys yes I agree but how do you enforce it especially when changing drivers? Nothing should be totally free in life and even my 80 year old mum has said for 15 odd years she’d be happy to pay a minimum 50p per trip.
Even including the concessionary pass income as fares, the average fare income per journey in England isn't much more than £1 as it is!

We are at the point where a significant portion of the entire fare income vanishes into the operational costs of collecting payment at all.

The bus system is already suffering due to reducing economies of scale from shrinking passenger numbers - we need bulk if the system is to survive at all.
 
Last edited:

Top