There is a clear agenda. We all know about Rhys's past. It's getting boring having it dragged up again and again.
It was on the radio yesterday that around 80% of teenagers get involved in something inappropriate on social media, so his internet past is in the majority. He clearly has sufficient finances and willing to take a risk to fund his business idea at a young age unlike many of us, and should be admired for that regardless of his past misdemeanours.
His plans have previously been found out before being reality and this has been his downfall in the past, he has clearly learnt from this as he is now citing commercial sensitivity on his night bus plan. Learning from past mistakes is a big positive.
Let's be fair about all of this.
On one side, talk of illegality of operation and people's sexuality (as has been spread elsewhere beyond this board) is beyond the pale.
It's not appropriate and should not be tolerated. I'm sure that Phil Stockley would not risk his reputation by running outside of the law. Likewise, we should all applaud and embrace entrepreneurship and not seek to denigrate the efforts of others. We all do things in the past that we perhaps regret - I know I do
Look at Velvet - Phil Stockley worked very hard and did some really good things, but would also concede that some mistakes were made on the way (and not those highlighted by armchair experts).
On the flip side, there is a very genuine interest in what CityFox say and do. They've courted publicity before (see KernowFox) and are very active in social media and that is obviously to create interest and demand. I think that interest is fair enough especially in KernowFox where there was no existing product.
So is the past an issue? Well, yes in so far that current perceptions are tainted by the past and it has created a level of cynicism amongst some people. That's why "learning from mistakes" is important.
Unfortunately, even this week, we have CityFox applauded for an innovative advertising campaign. It then gets highlighted in the national press that it's been taken lock, stock and barrel from another unrelated taxi business. It does hark back to previous examples of alleged plagiarism. Have lessons been learned?
To overcome cynicism, the maxim is often that to change views, you have to do things
sufficiently differently and sufficiently long enough to show that things have really changed.
Rhys and Phil appear to be open to taking questions (subject to understandably not divulging commercially sensitive information). There is a raft of conflicting information (part fact, part belief) out there. Perhaps asking some
genuine questions might be more appropriate if people want answers?
As you know, I generally have a PhD in cynicism (in all facets of life) but I have tried to be balanced