the steamer would have to stop at ashford attatch to a 92 or something and be towed to calais frethun regional platforms, to not to desturb eurostar traffic, and then on to wherever!
My own approach to the problem would be to calculate the entry speed required for the kettle to coast straight through the tunnel and emerge on the other side, then simply thrash it headlong into Folkstone TML yard at that speed plus 75mph!
hock:
Not only would that be less of a headache for Eurotunnel to deal with - There being no 92 needing digging up, not much work required to fit it into standard workings etc. - But the experience would be simply unforgettable from a passenger perspective! I'm not particularly a steam fan, myself...But that's one railtour I'd be
definite first in line for!
Anyhow...Moving onto stuff that does fit the scope of 20th/21st century technology...
Interesting to read above about Eurostars and why they have the odd bogie arrangement (Mostly articulated, except for the locos and the connection between cars 10 and 11) on them - I'd always wondered why they'd not used an articulated bogie on that bit, and now I know! 8)
Although mind ye, exactly the same could be done with an APT-P in a high-power configuration (Two power cars) too...Thus, not only was the APT-P well ahead of it's time in being compatable with an international rail tunnel that hadn't even been
proposed back then, but it would also have been compatable with TGV signalling systems with only a slight addition to the existing C-APT system!
To be honest...The more I look at the "downfall" of the APT-P, the more I'm inclined to think that every single smeghead on BR's board of
see you next Tuesdays directors should be nominated for the biggest and most shameful Darwin awards of all time!