• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Carmont (near Stonehaven) derailment - 12 August 2020

Status
Not open for further replies.

WestRiding

Member
Joined
21 Mar 2012
Messages
1,014
In these sorts of conditions with water being above the rail in some parts this morning, would there have been a reduced speed limit set in the rulebook or would it be driver discretion (I am not for one second saying the driver is at fault as it is obvious that it is not). I am also assuming that there would have been adhesion factors to play with too?
There would only be a restriction or block as per the rules, if someone knew about water over the railway. Someones has to find it first. Looks like this train found it. (if of course it was even a factor)
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

61653 HTAFC

Veteran Member
Joined
18 Dec 2012
Messages
17,679
Location
Another planet...
Probably since Polmont sadly
I seem to remember that speculation about DVTs after Heck, similarly to Polmont.

As an aside on Sky News reporting that one vehicle "just looked like a locomotive": Sky will probably make their reporting available to Fox News in the US, where AIUI ex-locomotives are (or were) often used as control cabs to avoid having to run round. Just a thought.
 

yorkie

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Administrator
Joined
6 Jun 2005
Messages
67,826
Location
Yorkshire
This is a fast moving thread; can I ask people please do check what has already been posted before posting, thanks.

Also just another reminder that any concerns regarding any posts must be reported using the report button; no such concerns should be posted in the thread, and any concerning content must not be replied to, quoted, or referred to on the thread please.

This is absolutely dreadful.

Have all of the passengers and staff now been found, either living or deceased?
See BTP statement in a post made a few minutes ago; post #336

https://www.railforums.co.uk/threads/stonehaven-derailment.207648/post-4717429
 

Tom Quinne

On Moderation
Joined
8 Jul 2017
Messages
2,225
Awful situation, and it's difficult to imagine how it could hae been entirely prevented, though it might be interesting to find out in the eventual RAIB report how quickly the train was moving - in an area with that sort of topography where a train has had to reverse due to a landslip, perhaps "dead slow" running might need to be enforced to reduce the loading on embankents that might well be weakened. R.I.P. to those who have died.

When encounter an obstruction, the train can reserve (wrong direction movement) upto 50mph on plain line, and then 10moh over points or crossings.

I’m not saying this happened, that is the rule book instruction.

I’ve had a 12 mile wrong direction move “dead slow” would have caused undue delay to the service, oh course is the key ultimately it’s up to the driver to decide the same as proceed at caution. Caution isn’t defined as a speed.
 

syorksdeano

Member
Joined
7 Jan 2011
Messages
729
Now confirmed as 3 dead. I know people are asking why the delay in the call, and I'm only assuming the delay in permission to go back due to the flooding in the area.

Thoughts are obviously with everyone involved including the person that would have given that final permission to go back.
 

Alanko

Member
Joined
2 May 2019
Messages
641
Location
Somewhere between Waverley and Queen Street.
Absolutely no chance. It's going to take hours if not days to get suitable lifting equipment in place to start moving anything.
I'm certain as well that when reovery starts they won't just be tossing coaches on top of other coaches. That just makes a bigger mess and damages any evidence that investigators might want to collect.
What you see in the photos is how they ended up when everything stopped moving. The bottom one is inverted and everything above the window line and below the sole bar appears to have been torn away. There's another inverted but seemingly intact coach on top of it.
Horrifying.

I doubt there'd be a crane or winch on site by the time those photos were taken. I'd assume that's as they lay after the incident. Harrowing to say the least.

That makes sense, what a terrible outcome.
 

GatwickDepress

Established Member
Joined
14 Jan 2013
Messages
2,288
Location
Leeds
Thoughts and prayers with everyone involved in this harrowing incident. When I saw 'derailment' on the news, I was expecting something like Waterloo a few years ago, not this...
 

Horizon22

Established Member
Associate Staff
Jobs & Careers
Joined
8 Sep 2019
Messages
7,580
Location
London
seems to me like network rail, or possibly a contractor must have been working in the vicinity. if you look at the images showing the lined up emergency vehicles you can see there is already metal sheeting down on the ground, a dumper and a port-a-loo. and in one of the images from the scene of the accident you can see a telehandler in the background.
BB17S1rL.img

Yes it was quoted that track workers were in close proximity and may have been some of the first people on site.
 

LeeLivery

Established Member
Joined
13 Jul 2014
Messages
1,462
Location
London
Just seen the news and the pictures coming out. I'm totally stunned and saddened, full thoughts with everyone involved.
 

najaB

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Aug 2011
Messages
30,830
Location
Scotland
I’ve had a 12 mile wrong direction move “dead slow” would have caused undue delay to the service, oh course is the key ultimately it’s up to the driver to decide the same as proceed at caution. Caution isn’t defined as a speed.
Also factoring into the decisionmaking would have been that the train had already passed over the section in question, so neither the driver nor signallers would have had reason to suspect that there was anything amiss.
 

Chris B

Member
Joined
28 May 2008
Messages
185
Live helicopter pictures just on Sky News - could not even see the (leading presumably) loco.

If you read the whole thread, you'll discover that it was derailed, went down an embankment & caught fire. Beware, there is a photo of it alight on page 4.
 

Dieseldriver

Member
Joined
9 Apr 2012
Messages
974
When encounter an obstruction, the train can reserve (wrong direction movement) upto 50mph on plain line, and then 10moh over points or crossings.

I’m not saying this happened, that is the rule book instruction.

I’ve had a 12 mile wrong direction move “dead slow” would have caused undue delay to the service, oh course is the key ultimately it’s up to the driver to decide the same as proceed at caution. Caution isn’t defined as a speed.
That isn't the Rule Book instruction at all.
 

Bonniepurple

New Member
Joined
5 Aug 2020
Messages
3
Location
Dursley
I’ve only just seen the horrendous picture on the news. Condolences to all those involved, the families waiting for news and those who are involved In the search, rescue and recovery of the wreckag.
 

Swanny200

Member
Joined
18 Sep 2010
Messages
671
If, as appears, both the driver and guard died in the accident (RIP), that might explain the seeming long delay in alerting the emergency services.

Another report stated that one member of onboard staff got to a signal box to raise the alarm (I assume they mean a lineside phone, as I assume a signal box round there would be non-existent) it kind of makes you glad that there were other members of staff onboard that would know to do this in an emergency, even more important if both Guard and Driver have indeed passed especially in such a remote place and probably carries weight when reduction in train staff gets mooted in future (although this is not a time to discuss that)
 

w0033944

Member
Joined
23 Jul 2011
Messages
552
Location
Norfolk
When encounter an obstruction, the train can reserve (wrong direction movement) upto 50mph on plain line, and then 10moh over points or crossings.

I’m not saying this happened, that is the rule book instruction.

I’ve had a 12 mile wrong direction move “dead slow” would have caused undue delay to the service, oh course is the key ultimately it’s up to the driver to decide the same as proceed at caution. Caution isn’t defined as a speed.
Thanks for the information. I realise that delays would result from running at a greatly reduced speed, and that the cost-benefit analysis prior to this incident would probably have suggested that it wasn't worth implementing such a policy, but maybe this might change given what could have happened had the train been more densely-occupied?
 

Chris B

Member
Joined
28 May 2008
Messages
185
seems to me like network rail, or possibly a contractor must have been working in the vicinity. if you look at the images showing the lined up emergency vehicles you can see there is already metal sheeting down on the ground, a dumper and a port-a-loo. and in one of the images from the scene of the accident you can see a telehandler in the background.
BB17S1rL.img

Why don't people please *read* the thread before posting? I made the same points a few pages ago. Might be NR, or might be other works - both drainage & timber works seemed to be going on prior.
 

Chris B

Member
Joined
28 May 2008
Messages
185
Another report stated that one member of onboard staff got to a signal box to raise the alarm (I assume they mean a lineside phone, as I assume a signal box round there would be non-existent) it kind of makes you glad that there were other members of staff onboard that would know to do this in an emergency, even more important if both Guard and Driver have indeed passed especially in such a remote place and probably carries weight when reduction in train staff gets mooted in future (although this is not a time to discuss that)

Or it means someone was spreading false news without proof.....again
 

4069

Member
Joined
8 Aug 2016
Messages
91
Another report stated that one member of onboard staff got to a signal box to raise the alarm (I assume they mean a lineside phone, as I assume a signal box round there would be non-existent)
No, it meant what it said- Carmont signal box.
 

SussexLad

Member
Joined
7 Jan 2020
Messages
193
Location
UK
My thoughts are with the passengers, friends and family of those affected by todays events. Such sad news.

I hope the goverment makes concelling services available to everyone affected.
 

Ianno87

Veteran Member
Joined
3 May 2015
Messages
15,215
Another report stated that one member of onboard staff got to a signal box to raise the alarm (I assume they mean a lineside phone, as I assume a signal box round there would be non-existent)

There is a signal box locally at Carmont. The area appears to be Absolute Block.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top