• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Carmont (near Stonehaven) derailment - 12 August 2020

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

LowLevel

Established Member
Joined
26 Oct 2013
Messages
7,604
If I remember correctly, not long after it was new, 158862 was run into very hard near Stockport - I went past a few days later and the body had had the cab crushed and the body bent upwards by the leading bogie. Needless to say 52862 was written off and the spare bodyshell kept at Derby was fitted up with 52862's interior and running gear. It was numbered 52862 (2) and joined undamaged 57862. If you check the bodyshell serial numbers, imprinted on the mounts over the rear bogie, all other units have both coaches very close in number but 52862 has a very high number.

It was 861 and the cab structure survived fairly intact as did the body itself, the front vestibule buckled. It was generally considered to have performed well I believe.
 

Chris B

Member
Joined
28 May 2008
Messages
185
2B13 Montrose-Inverurie (which was terminated at Stonehaven) passed over that section of track at some point between 0658 and 0713. What we don't know is how much time passed between then, 1T08 passing over it and the emergency services being called at 0943. I'd imagine that having reached the obstruction on the up line, 1T08 would have been stationary for some time while driver, signaller and control liaised on the next move.

Does RealTimeTrains not give a passing time anywhere heading north?
 

Darandio

Established Member
Joined
24 Feb 2007
Messages
10,678
Location
Redcar
As stated earlier, the 158's are Aluminium, the same as the Thames Turbo, which did not fare well at Ladbroke Grove under heavy impact

Which has absolutely no bearing on whether one would have fared worse today. We simply don't know and hopefully we never have something similar again to test the theory.
 

the sniper

Established Member
Joined
4 Sep 2007
Messages
3,499
To me this more proves quite how poor HSTs and Mark 3s are in comparison to modern stock. The 390 involved at Greyrigg came off the line at 95mph, went down an embankment, tumbled and remained structurally sound, mostly intact and coupled. As I understand it linespeed here was 75 but its likely the HST was doing significantly less, and we have one coach demolished, two upside down, one on it own down an embankment and a severely damaged power car.

We have no idea how the crash unfolded yet. I don't know how you can make a comparison at this point. Just because both fulfil the same basic criteria of have ended up off an embankment, there's no way of knowing what forces were involved.

Driving your car off the edge of an embankment into an empty field at 95mph could end up far better than driving your car head on into something solid at 75mph...
 
Last edited:

Journeyman

Established Member
Joined
16 Apr 2014
Messages
6,295
It was 861 and the cab structure survived fairly intact as did the body itself, the front vestibule buckled. It was generally considered to have performed well I believe.

Yup. The vestibules are designed as crumple zones.
 

Royston Vasey

Established Member
Joined
14 May 2008
Messages
2,186
Location
Cambridge
But isn’t the vehicle body that end grey and burnt whereas it should be First Group blue?
The burnt end is the inner end, the cab end is closer to the camera in that picture of the PC. You can see that the bulkhead door visible is on the left hand side, so it must be the cab. I think a combination of muck/dust and sunlight is obscuring the colour of the paintwork. Also the grille is clearly towards the burnt end and you can see some light grey paint near there, as well as possibly the dark window ribbon.
 
Last edited:

Philip Phlopp

Established Member
Joined
31 May 2015
Messages
3,004
We have no idea how the crash unfolded. I don't know how you can make a comparison. Just because both fulfil the same basic criteria of have ended up off an embankment, there's no way of knowing what forces were involved.

Driving your car off the edge of an embankment into an empty field at 95mph could end up far better than driving your car head on into something solid at 75mph...

This.

The precise sequence of events will need to be established before rolling stock experts can assess whether different (note - not necessarily more modern) rolling stock could have resulted in fewer/no fatalities, or would have resulted in more fatalities and severe injuries.
 

rebmcr

Established Member
Joined
15 Nov 2011
Messages
3,851
Location
St Neots
It *looks* to be the case here that the train has jack-knifed and then one of the carriages ended up getting wedged in place. No vehicle is going to come out well in that situation, the energy simply has to go somewhere.

Indeed, there is some similarity to Eschede in that regard.
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
97,879
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
I imagine those working / travelling on 2B13 will be thanking their lucky stars right now. With the aluminium bodies, a class 158 has never really been tested in a high energy accident (bar a few fairly low speed collisions) and the results could have been pretty bad as well.

The not-dissimilar Thames Turbo body has, and it didn't perform well, though that was a much higher speed collision.
 

Domh245

Established Member
Joined
6 Apr 2013
Messages
8,426
Location
nowhere
ScotRail aren't using any blue power cars any more.

I thought that the power cars were still blue underneath, with vinyls applied over the top. You can see this looking at the cab area where the blue goes from the matte of the vinyl to the gloss of the paint.
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
97,879
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
The BBC doesn't appear to care much about accurate reporting any more. The original reports about carriages going down the embankment may have terrified people who were waiting for news about their relatives, not that the correct situation was really any better given that three people had died in this tragedy.

It (mostly) wasn't inaccurate. One coach (plus a power car) did go down the embankment.
 

FrodshamJnct

Established Member
Joined
14 Apr 2019
Messages
3,455
Location
Cheshire
Did you ever see the leading power car from Ladbroke Grove after the crash? There is a picture online somewhere of it at Crewe works. It was blackened/burnt but almost intact.

It kept its structural form.

Did you see the HST after the incident at Neville Hill last year? These things are all relative to the circumstances.
 

ainsworth74

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
16 Nov 2009
Messages
27,679
Location
Redcar
I would ask members to exercise caution. I'm not sure there's much to be gained right now from comparisons between different types of rolling stock. There may be some value to these in the future once the full sequence of events is known in the meantime I think it might be best to leave it here.
 

talldave

Established Member
Joined
24 Jan 2013
Messages
2,184
My thoughts are with those involved today and with everyone who has to deal with the aftermath - either directly on scene or indirectly as a part of the railway family keeping services running tomorrow and beyond.
 
Joined
18 Sep 2018
Messages
79
Tragic situation. My thoughts & prayers are with the family & friends of those who passed away, with all who were on the train and the valient people helping in the rescue.
I will continue to use as a passenger what I consider to be a very very safe and the most pleasant way of travelling.
 

theironroad

Established Member
Joined
21 Nov 2014
Messages
3,697
Location
London
What a tragic day for the families, friends and colleagues of those who've died and been injured.

My heartfelt condolences go to all.

As a driver, it's days like this that remind me that life at the pointy end has its risks and not coming home from ' just another turn' is always a possibility.

I'm not interested in armchair speculation or over analysing pictures, I'll leave all that to the RAIB.

It's been an emotional day, but nothing in comparison to what those near to the incident are enduring.

To all fellow drivers, guards and on board crew, while it's not always possible - stay safe out there.

Good night.
 

Rob_76

Member
Joined
27 May 2020
Messages
31
Location
Newcastle
I read in an earlier post in this thread that one of the news outlets, I forget which one, had reported that the alarm was raised by someone walking to a signal box.
Of course that may not be the case, however, there is a signal box - Carmont (prefix CM), which is manned 24 hrs - located around 2 km in the up direction (e.g. towards Edinburgh) from the accident site (between mileposts 220 and 221). The next box in the down direction is Stonehaven (prefix SV). It appears the area in question is signalled by Carmont.
There is a diagram of the track and associated infrastructure, albeit from a few years ago, on pages 18 and 19 of this Network Rail FOI disclosure document:
 
Last edited:

infobleep

Veteran Member
Joined
27 Feb 2011
Messages
12,661
Does RealTimeTrains not give a passing time anywhere heading north?
When's train takes an unplanned route or returns on itself, Real Time Trains cannot take that into account.

For example if a train is diverted, you will just see no report against the timing points and stations it skipped. You will not see the timings along the route it actually took.
 

156443

Member
Joined
28 Mar 2016
Messages
182
Location
Prudhoe
Scotrail have announced on their social media accounts that the guard died along with the driver and a passenger.

Nobody should go to work and not return.
 

Eyersey468

Established Member
Joined
14 Sep 2018
Messages
2,163
My condolences to all the families involved and I wish all those injured a speedy recovery
 

HamworthyGoods

Established Member
Joined
15 Jan 2019
Messages
3,938
Scotrail have announced on their social media accounts that the guard died along with the driver and a passenger.

Nobody should go to work and not return.

And no passenger should get on a train and not reach their destination alive through no fault of their own.

The death of any person, whether a staff member or a passenger entrusting their safety in the railway is tragic and a sad day for the industry.
 

Clarence Yard

Established Member
Joined
18 Dec 2014
Messages
2,494
Nobody should leave their life at work and it's a horrible job to go and have to tell their other half (in my case with a BTP WPC) - the moment she opened the door and you saw his things - those moments stay with you for ever.

Can I echo the comments about not comparing different traction types as speculation could lead to uninformed press comments. Turbos have great low speed collision strength but the closing speeds at Ladbroke Grove would have adversely tested many a DMU design to a greater or lesser extent. Every build type behaves differently in different situations and I am sure the RAIB will be all over that aspect of the accident.
 

johntea

Established Member
Joined
29 Dec 2010
Messages
2,602
We all die at some point, that’s life, but the thought of leaving the front door as either a member of rail staff or passenger for a routine journey and not returning back home is one I’m still struggling to process almost 12 hours on, (even more so when I woke up this morning here in Yorkshire to a bright blue sky with abroad style humid heat)

A complete tragedy, RIP to victims and a huge thanks to the emergency services of course

Excuse my scientific ignorance but what causes the fire, the force of the impact? Fuel?
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
97,879
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
Excuse my scientific ignorance but what causes the fire, the force of the impact? Fuel?

In most collisions involving vehicles powered by liquid fuels of whatever type (be that trains, cars or planes, though you'd have to put some effort in for that to occur with a ship) what happens is that the collision breaches either the fuel tank or the pressurised fuel line, causing fuel to spray out, and that fuel sprays around, lands on something hot (engine components, typically), evaporates and ignites. The heat from that can then cause a cycle of the remaining liquid fuel evaporating and burning.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top