• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Stop-and-search powers ruled illegal by European court

Status
Not open for further replies.

the sniper

Established Member
Joined
4 Sep 2007
Messages
3,499
Yes I think you are right it is the MET I was reffering to. I apologise for omitting that information. I have a close friend in the BTP. It is a good force to work for. Have you applied yet?

Yep, a little while back. I've passed the paper shift and have got my assessment coming up soon. :)
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Polls

Member
Joined
16 Dec 2009
Messages
81
Location
West London
Yep, a little while back. I've passed the paper shift and have got my assessment coming up soon. :)

Well done! I actually think the paper sift is the hardest bit. I did the MET specials and believe the assesments are the same so let me know if you want any advice :D
 

the sniper

Established Member
Joined
4 Sep 2007
Messages
3,499
Well done! I actually think the paper sift is the hardest bit. I did the MET specials and believe the assesments are the same so let me know if you want any advice :D

Thanks, I will most probably take you up on that offer. :)
 

Old Timer

Established Member
Joined
24 Aug 2009
Messages
3,703
Location
On a plane somewhere at 35,000
I agree with much of what you say on this topic, but I think it's not a good argument to use the race card in this. By that logic, in the 1980s and 1990s they should have stopped mostly Irish people as it was the IRA bombing us then. Manchester, Warrington, London, to name just three places out of several that were bombed and where innocent people killed by the IRA. Also remember the station closures as a result of IRA bomb scares?
The Special Branch were permanently based at the three Sea Ports and Irish people were stopped and questioned.

However because most Irish people did not support the IRA there was much more "intelligence based" information. There was never any rejoicing in the streets or parties when there was a bombing, neither were there people willing to stand up and applaud the deaths of Soldiers, as is the case today.

In the current scenario there is a sizeable chunk who do sympathise with the likes of Choudary and who are unwilling to become involved in giving evidence against a "fellow brother".

The 70s and the early 80s were definitely NOT a time to speak with an Irish accent and many innocent people were sent down on the basis of fabricated evidence. Any Muslims who protest about being singled out ought to read up a bit of history from then or talk to some of the older Irish people.
 

jon0844

Veteran Member
Joined
1 Feb 2009
Messages
28,055
Location
UK
The 70s and the early 80s were definitely NOT a time to speak with an Irish accent and many innocent people were sent down on the basis of fabricated evidence. Any Muslims who protest about being singled out ought to read up a bit of history from then or talk to some of the older Irish people.

I remember the check points in the Square Mile (City of London) and they were clearly looking for Irish people then. When the threat from the IRA and splinter groups went, so did the checkpoints.

Well, they are still there but empty. I am really tempted one day to bring a stool and sit in one with my laptop and see how long I can work there without being approached!! Cheap office space in the City is hard to find you know!

@thesniper; good luck with everything. At least you'll be adding to the list of 'good' cops, thus reducing the percentage of bad ones!
 

HaxbyFur

Member
Joined
20 Oct 2009
Messages
70
Location
York, UK
Now our own courts have revealed misuse of "reasonable suspicion" stop & search (a different kind to s44).

"The stop and search of 11-year-old twins at the Kingsnorth Climate Camp was unlawful, Kent police have admitted at London's High Court."

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/kent/8454959.stm

I had some degree of sympathy at first.. then I thought, what right minded parent takes their 11 year old twins to a protest rally?!
 

jon0844

Veteran Member
Joined
1 Feb 2009
Messages
28,055
Location
UK
...And please keep your eyes open if you're out and about in a police car!

Today, a funny thing happened on the way home from picking up my wife.

On the A1(M) towards the Hatfield tunnel, which is being renovated and with lane restrictions and a 40mph limit, I was pulling off the road but still in a 40mph restriction until the end of the sliproad; a van comes up behind me at speed and wants to try and nudge me to go faster. I don't, simply because the car in front is a fully marked police car!!

What happens next? Well, the van undertakes, using part of the hard shoulder and then tries to overtake the police car, which he does when it opens up near the roundabout!

What the hell is going on when a van can try and force a cop car over!

He then has to stop at red lights on the roundabout and the police car drive merely looks over at him and proceeds to turn off to the left, letting the crazy van driver continue pushing vehicles out of his way on the roundabout and into Hatfield.

If the cop took the registration and referred it to other units, I'd be shocked as he didn't seem to be doing anything at all - except looking rather shocked at what he'd just seen! The wife suggested he was probably returning to Police HQ in WGC to finish his shift, so turned a blind eye.
 

ralphchadkirk

Established Member
Joined
20 Oct 2008
Messages
5,753
Location
Essex
Maybe, maybe not. It may be that the policemen inside were response officers, so may not be equipped with the correct knowledge and paperwork for traffic law. Also, IIRC a policeman can only pull a car over if he is pursuit trained, and in an appropriate car (volvo t5 etc). Response officers are not pursuit trained, and won't be in an appropriate car (more likely a Vauxhall Astra!). So there's not much they can do apart from take down the number plate and circulate it to the traffic officers.
 

royaloak

Established Member
Joined
11 Oct 2009
Messages
1,389
Location
today I will mostly be at home decorating
Wrong Ralph, any copper can pull a vehicle over, I have even seen a beat bobby pull a car because the driver was on a mobile phone. ordinary officers cannot get into a pursuit though they can follow a vehicle discretely until traffic cops can make it to the area.
 

ralphchadkirk

Established Member
Joined
20 Oct 2008
Messages
5,753
Location
Essex
I stand corrected then, my understanding was that response policemen couldn't. Just to be on the safe side, I have asked at a police forum I am a member of.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
I just checked, and most officers can pull cars over, but some do not hold the correct driving permits to do so, so jonmorris0844 may have seen one of them.
 

jon0844

Veteran Member
Joined
1 Feb 2009
Messages
28,055
Location
UK
He was on his own and wasn't on a radio and his lips weren't moving, so he wasn't talking to anyone on a hands free.

I suspect he just wanted to return to base. If he remembers the plate and does a subsequent check later, I hope for his sake it doesn't flag up as being stolen or something and he has to pretend he didn't see it!
 

David

Established Member
Joined
9 Jul 2005
Messages
5,103
Location
Scunthorpe
I'll just repost something I said in a similar topic not so long back ....

Control is nothing without fear. Where none exists, you create it.

That is a line in a book called State of Fear written by Michael Chrichton. It will explain how governments and organisations go about creating a state of fear about something, even if the plot is a bit far fetched. All Section 44 is designed to do, is to create a state of fear (reinforced by the media) among us so the government can "justify" extra control over everyone through the likes of ID cards, CCTV, etc ....
 

jon0844

Veteran Member
Joined
1 Feb 2009
Messages
28,055
Location
UK
It works well. If done effectively, the public will back it and support it. In fact, they'll even defend it; 'If you've nothing to hide', 'I'd rather be stripped naked than end up blown up' etc.

If anyone thinks this is an exaggeration or a conspiracy theory, I'll just say that when I went to New York in 2003 - just before the approval to 'go in' to Iraq - they had the Army out at Heathrow. They had soldiers standing in high-profile locations in and around the airport, even the approaching roads. It was like we were under siege.

They were there for a few days max, but it helped convince us that something had to be done. The troops were already in Iraq, the decision was made (now proved by Tony Blair's admission on GMTV!) and we supported it because we didn't want to die!

I used to be in the 'if you've nothing to hide' camp. I guess most people were. History has woken me up to think a bit more intelligently.
 
Last edited:

ChampsRacing

Member
Joined
10 Jun 2007
Messages
269
Location
London
To be honest ive only ever been stopped and searched one by btp and asked what my activities where by a station manager at ealing broadway and both ended up with me continuing filming/photographing trains, im not sure if being a railway employee helps me in some cases or if ive just been lucky.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top