That seems a little over the top - it just didn't look a particularly nice pub!
I have to agree totally with scott118, calling a pub scummy is particularly unpleasant. I doubt I find the type of pubs you frequent to my taste, but I don't insult them. The Berney Arms was nominated pub of the year many times by the local CAMRA branch and has been listed by the local council as an "Asset of Communuty Value" so I'm by no means alone in having a view different from you.
In that case, it should close immediately.
Would you expect them to send a helicopter if the train at Altnabreac was cancelled?
More complete nonsense, it is perfectly feasible to drive a normal car/van to Altnabreac. Indeed in season many fisherman do, to fish in the lochs. Yes the road is gated, but when I passed by the gates weren't locked at Forsinain or Strathmore Lodge - indeed at Strathmore the Royal Mail van was entering as I left.
I doubt any gate on the Berney Arms track is locked, since it serves 2 or 3 farms, a few houses and a major pumping station, and Berney Arms the settlement.
I must admit I'm a little surprised the police didn't send a car, having worked on police command and control IT systems in my younger days the emergency services would have the route to Berney Arms on their control system and contact numbers for any locked gates. But they decided to pass it to the Coastguard, perhaps they were busy.
People have to look after themselves properly. If you choose to go somewhere remote, you choose to accept some consequences if, as is inevitable at some point, something goes wrong.
Yes but the railways also have a duty to their passengers. The argument that Berney Arms/Altnabreac are too inaccessible is complete and utter rubbish (although I wouldn't expect anyone from Milton Keynes to comprehend this).
Only if someone who would benefit from the initial deed of covenant (or similar) raised it with the Courts, I guess. Is a descendent of the original landowner in the position to do that? Would they care to do that? It sounds rather similar to the deeds of covenant you get on houses that are basically unenforceable.
More complete and utter poppycock. Your guess is completely wrong and you are again showing complete and utter ignorance of the situation. Its nothing at all to do with "Deeds of Covenants" or the rights of landowners. The High Court decided that an Act of Parliament should be interpreted that trains should serve the station in perpetuity.
As I previously stated, that can only be overridden by the Parliament changing the Act or the High Court changing its mind. If the railway tried to stop serving the station, anybody could apply for a Court Order to prevent it, it would be an illegal act, contrary to the sovereign will of Parliament.
(*Here I have to admit there is a possibility Parliament has changed the bill via subsequent legislation.)
I'm afraid this forum badly needs a block members function.