No excuse for not getting a 2:1 from Richmond Commun, no excuse for not having a part-time job from Ms Patel, and no excuse from emoloyers for not having relevant work experience (not shelf-stacking, and maybe unpaid).
It may seem harsh to you now, but there are realities in life that maybe you've yet to experience fully. Life is all about challenges, overcoming them and any unfairness that you encounter. I've had my share of all those ,and there is no guaranteed way to avoid them.
The fact is that employers don't care about any of the pressures that anyone is under. When they are considering taking someone on, it will all come down to their experience, their character, how they present themselves, what they have achieved, and, yes, how they may have overcome obstacles and difficulties they have faced may also be a factor.
Usually there will be an element of most, if not all of the above involved. Shelf stacking can certainly play a part. It proves a candidate can turn up for work at the appointed time, can follow instructions, work within a team and possesses a whole host of other competencies as well.
This is what employers are looking for. If an applicant hasn't got enough strings to their bow, they are going to struggle tog et very far.
See what I mean about unrealistic expectations? If there is a person alive who can do all of those things while maintaining a healthy lifestyle and participating in society (by, I don't know, having friends) I will eat my sandals.
There are plenty of students who manage to do this, and more. My wife sees them almost every day!
The fact is that not everyone is able to do it. We are all individuals, we have different strengths, weaknesses and abilities. embrace them all, and accept that sometimes you won't succeed, but that doesn't make you any less of a person.
It all stems from the continuing obession with the idea that if you're not rich and successful, it must be because you didn't try very hard. And it's just nonsense.
Some people are rich and successful despite never having tried much at all. Others try and never succeed (see above). Some people work very hard indeed and eventually reap the rewards of that, though usually with an element of luck. I've never been aware of any obsession, though, that everyone must be rich and successful. it would be impossible to achieve!
It isn't. I know people who were lazy at uni and came out with a 2.2 but could have got a First. I also know people who got a 2.2 while trying their best. I see no reason we shouldn't push the former to put the effort in.
If you know you're putting the effort in, why "succumb" to the pressure?
Maybe I could have got a first, with a little more application. I don't know, but my grades varied between a high 2:2 and a first all the way through, though most of them were mid range 2:1. Would the sacrifices I'd have had to make in terms of cutting down on work and socialising have been worth the improvement? Well, I didn't think about it the time, but with hindsight, I'd say no!
As someone who has just graduated with a 2:1 (0.25% off a first, but there you go!), with a job due to start imminently and already with the weight of professional responsibility, I agree with Priti Patel and RichmondCommuter.
Congratulations on your result and your job.
It may be difficult to accept, but employers do not just want a good degree, they also want a well rounded person with relevant experience. That's life. You can refuse to get experience because you don't think you can manage it, but ultimately the only person you're hurting in the long term is you.
You've put it much better than my feeble attempts earlier in this post. However, I maintain that not everyone is capable, for various reasons, of achieving a good degree, holding down a part time job and remaining healthy in mind and body.
I'm well aware of how stressful university can be, but I'm also of the experience that it is (barring external problems) as stressful as you make it. Leave assignments to the last minute then of course you're going to do worse and be more stressed.
It's easy to give this sort of advice, and my experience is almost identical to yours (I always started assignments early, and finished them early too!), but I maintain that some are unable to cope properly. That's why there are drop outs, counselling services and the like, not all of the stress is from external factors.
I think it's rather telling that all those who have graduated or have jobs are all of a similar opinion on this point.
True, but I suspect that we are the ones that were able to cope with it all. I;m the first to admit that I think I was greatly helped by the fact that I'd matured a lot by the tiem I went to higher education. I'd had several years of holding down a reasonable job, working shifts, and I was well aware of how to manage money and time.
I do feel that not everyone is equipped for university at a younger age. I don't feel that I was. So I do have some sympathy with those that start a course and then succumb to the pressures involved. I honestly believe that had I gone at the age of 18 or 19 instead of 29, I would have ended up with serious mental health issues. By the time I went I was able to cope with it.
I don't agree with you! I will agree that it may well depend on what kind of job/career you are looking for. My chosen profession (I am now on my second ) had a very defined and structured graduation to certification route to which university bar work offered roughly nothing.
The point that some careers might be far less interested in irrelevant part time jobs is a fair one. My instinct is that these are very much in the minority, though.
I would agree with that. Although if you were recruiting two English teachers, would you take the one with a first from York, or the one with a 2:1 from Newcastle but had also worked as a teaching assistant part time/worked with special needs pupils etc? I know which one I would choose!
The point that it isn't just about academic achievement is also a fair one. Base don the criteria you've put forward, the 2:1 candidate appears stronger overall. But, having worked in recruitment, I feel it's not clear cut by any means. There may be other strengths and attributes that the first candidate has which are not confined to [part time work alone, such as voluntary work, experience when travelling abroad.
These are things that can be explored at interview, which is, of course why hardly anyone is ever taken on without one!