How long will it take by Slashing everything in sight and trying to squeeze as much out of everyone in taxes to conceivably make the slightest dent in £900,000,000,000? And what is the actual ambition, if & when they should ever succeed in paying off that £900,000,000,000? Isn't it just so that the Uk's credit Rating isn't downgraded; i.e. so that they could borrow and get back into debt all over again?
I'm afraid it's easy to say things like "Roads are the enemy", but exactly the same increases in Fuel prices have to be paid by bus operators too, and the situaiton where everyone could use rail for all their transport needs is never likely to arise; not to mention that all the stuff that people want from shops has to get their by road transport (even if it uses Rail for part of the way), so costs & hence prices will inevitably rise there too.
Yes, I know I'm being rather simplistic (and I make a rather hypocritical exception for the Great North Road because I live on it). I'd have done things differently, partly by abolishing VED as part of a tax simplification programme and putting the cost onto fuel instead. I'd also start taxing aviation fuel, but then I'd have restarted bus regulation among other things. But is it good for the railways if we do our level best to tax motorists off the roads? I'm not sure. It's certainly good for the planet if we reduce road mileage. Going to the extreme with "Is your journey really necessary?" posters and fuel rationing might be taking it too far. Reducing the national speed limit by 10 mph is another option worth looking at.
As for borrowing, the target would be an equivalent of the Gold Standard by 2050. Following governments might abolish that, but I think it's reasonable. Also, AIUI, our interest payments will go up if we lose AAA credit rating, thus making the problem worse.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
So why cut the top rate of tax? Why are they cutting jobs at HMRC instead of focussing on tax evasion and tax avoidance, typically by the super rich?
I understand the 50p tax rate was only ever temporary but it gives plenty of ammunition to suggest that these cuts are as much ideology as necessity.
Money is available for certain projects though, Universal Credit and HS2 to name two, the latter being a perfect example of borrowing to invest. The former on the other hand is an unworkable farce but then what do we expect when policymakers have never struggled to make ends meet.
What the Conservatives either don't understand or actually approve of is that the private sector does nothing for free. Look where privatisation of energy and transport got us :roll:. I suspect there was a good budget in 1997 because Major and Thatcher sold Britain to the highest bidder :roll:
Cutting the top rate was daft, I reckon. Mostly because of the signal it sent rather than any serious financial loss. Again, I'd have done things differently, by tearing up the entire tax code and starting from scratch using something resembling negative income tax. There would be no exemptions of any kind, but the child benefit, the state pension and various other things would go up to compensate for the loss of tax credits. I'd consider getting rid of capital gains tax to encourage investment, and allow one home to be exempted from inheritance tax, although it would be charged for all. Reducing the size of Revenue and Customs might be workable then, they would have less to do apart from preventing people from hiding their income. PFI would go completely, and there's a nationalisation list starting with the communications industry, passing through all utilities and finishing with airports. We'd also have no nuclear weapons by now, but would have airworthy Harriers in exchange, and two aircraft carriers to fly them off.
As for HS2, that would be under construction ASAP. That's true investment.
I also seem to have gone past 3,000 posts somewhere.