Theresa Villiers says Northern Hub to only go ahead in part

Discussion in 'Infrastructure & Stations' started by sittingnev, 26 Oct 2011.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. aformeruser

    aformeruser Veteran Member

    Messages:
    30,637
    Joined:
    23 Jan 2009
    Which lost a 4 car Voyager every 2 hours and TPE were expected to plug that gap using 185s.

    It's be like making Manchester-Hull 2 hourly and then commenting on there being more doubled up services.



    And the west side has only 142s which is inferior to a combination of 144s and 142s.

    I said about inferior rolling stock on the west side and you came back with capacity in your response.

    Statistically the North West has more passengers than Yorkshire and Yorkshire has more passengers than the North East. So if you're saying the North West has more carriages than Yorkshire then it means Northern (and TPE) have got one thing right.
     
  2. Lampshade

    Lampshade Established Member

    Messages:
    3,565
    Joined:
    3 Sep 2009
    Location:
    South London
    That's because it's portion worked to Barrow/Glasgow and Edinburgh/Windermere. Best way to look at it is 2 3-car services departing Piccadilly concurrently, not 1 6-car service.
     
  3. tbtc

    tbtc Veteran Member

    Messages:
    15,601
    Joined:
    16 Dec 2008
    Location:
    Sheffield
    Manchester - Preston is four/hour (albeit some services run by Northern with doubled up 156s or single 180s), Manchester - Leeds is four hour (plus some significantly slower services via Rochdale)
    --- old post above --- --- new post below ---
    Its still a six coach train (on the four/hour services from Manchester to Preston).

    I'd be happy if some of the TPE services through Leeds had portions to/from Middlesbrough/Scarborough (etc), if it meant a six coach train on the busy section.
     
  4. LNW-GW Joint

    LNW-GW Joint Veteran Member

    Messages:
    13,538
    Joined:
    22 Feb 2011
    Location:
    Mold, Clwyd
    In addition to Ordsall curve:

    a) Two more platforms (P15/16) at Piccadilly to improve throughput via the MSJ&A line and the Ordsall curve. This is all elevated fancy engineering and will cost a bomb.
    But without them the new curve is crippled, so improvements on to Yorks/Lancs will suffer.

    b) Upgrade of Manchester Victoria

    c) New loops and speed upgrade Manchester-Leeds

    I guess they are baulking at the cost of the Piccadilly work.
     
  5. aformeruser

    aformeruser Veteran Member

    Messages:
    30,637
    Joined:
    23 Jan 2009
    Like for like comparison please.

    Manchester to Leeds: 4 fast trains per hour, 3 slow trains per hour. Additional (slow) services between Manchester and Huddersfield and between Huddersfield and Leeds.

    Manchester to Preston: 2 fast trains per hour, 2 slow trains per hour. Additional (slow) services between Bolton and Manchester.

    Let's also bring in another similar route:

    Manchester to Liverpool: 3 fast trains per hour, 3 slow trains per hour. Additional (slow) services between Warrington and Liverpool.

    Villers did say it wasn't an all or nothing, so it's possible one idea will be dropped and two will go forward or that two will be dropped and one will go forward.
     
    Last edited: 26 Oct 2011
  6. WatcherZero

    WatcherZero Established Member

    Messages:
    9,228
    Joined:
    25 Feb 2010
    That wouldnt make sense as the Piccadilly work is the core of the whole scheme, required for the benefits of everything else to be realised. The chord has already been approved (as it will have the longest lead times) and the platforms will have to be approved next otherwise your just adding capacity midpoint along lines which dont have it at the end.

    Lot of forumers are getting over excited and turning on each other when shes just being a Conservative and saying no unconditional approvals, you have pry every penny for the North from our cold dead hands.
     
  7. YorkshireBear

    YorkshireBear Established Member

    Messages:
    7,656
    Joined:
    23 Jul 2010
    I think we all need to stop argueing i dont think there is an answer to which side is worse.

    Btw so london and the south east has 15 million and has x billion spent on it...
    the North has 14 million so should get y billion spent on it (where y is approximately 95% of x). It doesnt matter that the South East has more people in less space. That doesnt alter facts at all. The north would be getting a fair deal as same amount of money is being spent on a much larger area.... so per land area the south would still get more spent on it like it should but the proportion of money spent in terms of populations numbers remains fairly steady. With most likely higher per person in south due to higher wages down there.

    And i hate warm weather so i am staying up north :)
     
  8. tbtc

    tbtc Veteran Member

    Messages:
    15,601
    Joined:
    16 Dec 2008
    Location:
    Sheffield
    True, it just seems quite symbolic from us talking about aspirations like TPE North electrification, as if they were guaranteed to happen to now talking about things that we assumed *would* happen now being scaled back.

    Suddenly the optimism looks to have left the building.
     
  9. aformeruser

    aformeruser Veteran Member

    Messages:
    30,637
    Joined:
    23 Jan 2009
    North TPE electrification with Valley Lines electrification was suggested as Network Rail's preferred method of getting Pacers replaced.

    Electrification obviously has high initial costs, so the government has a choice between ordering new DMUs as direct Pacer replacement (lower initial costs but higher lifetime costs) or electrification.

    Part of the reasoning behind North West and Thames Valley electrification is new units are needed for Thameslink due to the requirements of Thameslink and the alternative would involve putting trains in to store or writing them off early, so an electrification program made sense to the last government and they just needed to decide which areas and with a new DMU order for Northern, TPE and FGW being proposed - that's how they made their decision.
     
    Last edited: 26 Oct 2011
  10. tbtc

    tbtc Veteran Member

    Messages:
    15,601
    Joined:
    16 Dec 2008
    Location:
    Sheffield
    Agreed, but if the Northern Hub improvements (which we assumed were all going ahead) are now "up for debate" then "wishlist" plans like further electrification are now (in my eyes) less likely.

    Sad that this has come out shortly after our new Transport Minister got her job, which doesn't set out a very positive message (even if little *real* has changed, and "stage two" of Northern Hub was never guaranteed, its a pretty negative indication of The Future.
     
  11. swt_passenger

    swt_passenger Veteran Member

    Messages:
    21,209
    Joined:
    7 Apr 2010
    If you go back 18 months or so, the rail media were generally assuming that Thameslink would be cut back to the MML side only, and Crossrail would lose a couple of its branches, because the new government were conducting a 'major review'.

    So IMHO this is simply the usual horse trading in advance of the HLOS/SofA for CP5. It's far too early for any promises to be made about what will or won't be included...
     
  12. Nym

    Nym Established Member

    Messages:
    8,124
    Joined:
    2 Mar 2007
    Location:
    Somewhere, not in London
    Sorry, but where are these doubled up 156s you speak of, every Hazel Grove - Preston diagram I've seen this week (and I should know, I commute on it!) has been a single 150, so I've given up and gone to Victoria instead...
     
  13. cle

    cle Established Member

    Messages:
    1,884
    Joined:
    17 Nov 2010
    Two things.

    TPE electrification is not necessarily part of The Northern Hub. It might be an NR/RUS-led project with money coming from a national pot.

    Secondly, with parity in rail investment - would the North be happy to pay Southern rail fares?
     
  14. tbtc

    tbtc Veteran Member

    Messages:
    15,601
    Joined:
    16 Dec 2008
    Location:
    Sheffield
    When I mentioned that four coach EMU (e.g. 319?) would be a capacity increase on the Pacers/Sprinters currently used in Manchester, I was told that all the peak diagrams on the Preston line into/out of Manchester were at least four coach.
     
  15. yorksrob

    yorksrob Veteran Member

    Messages:
    21,291
    Joined:
    6 Aug 2009
    Location:
    Yorks
    No - although it has to be said that outside of PTE areas, the North generally does pay Southern rail fares.
     
  16. snail

    snail Established Member

    Messages:
    1,818
    Joined:
    16 Jun 2011
    Location:
    t'North
    That's not quite the same tone as the news article in the OP. Better to get some of it than none at all?
     
  17. ainsworth74

    ainsworth74 Moderator Staff Member Moderator

    Messages:
    20,919
    Joined:
    16 Nov 2009
    Location:
    Redcar
    Very true! For instance it's £4.90 for a Cottingham - Hull anytime day return. That's a journey of 6 minutes each way covering slightly under 4 miles! Burley Park - Leeds anytime day return is £2.35 for a 3 mile journey of about 4/5 minutes. Wish I lived in a PTE area.
     
  18. Oswyntail

    Oswyntail Established Member

    Messages:
    4,183
    Joined:
    23 May 2009
    Location:
    Yorkshire
    Yes, I am quite surprised that, even once we had located the text of the full speech (which amounted to not very much to write home about), the forum gloom machine went into overdrive. Even the quoted post, which, if you removed the bits I have put in bold, would just be common sense.
     
  19. aformeruser

    aformeruser Veteran Member

    Messages:
    30,637
    Joined:
    23 Jan 2009
    In a previous thread I pointed out that there are two morning TPE peak arrivals in to Manchester from Preston operated by 6 car 185s and two morning Northern arrivals operated by 180s. This was in relation to 4 car EMUs without SDO not being best suited.

    There was no mention in that thread about how many carriages are on services in the other direction at peak times, so no-one should have drawn the conclusion that all Manchester-Preston services were more than 2 carriages.

    I'd pay a higher fare for a regular journey on a 142/150 in Cheshire then equivalent journeys in Kent on a 465.

    The only investment I know about in Cheshire in the last couple of years is information points at a couple of village stations on the WCML, a Harrington hump at Northwich station (really given it's usage it should have got a platform rebuild) and some newly installed second hand benches on the Manchester bound platform at Knutsford and new seat covers on a few of the trains that operate in the area.
     
    Last edited: 26 Oct 2011
  20. Lampshade

    Lampshade Established Member

    Messages:
    3,565
    Joined:
    3 Sep 2009
    Location:
    South London
    To be fair, Southern rail fares are quite reasonable. London - Bristol is roughly on a par with Liverpool - Scarborough (similar in terms of distance and cost per mile) and off peak fares are very good value.

    Preston - Blackburn return is £5.40 SDR and similar in distance as Faversham to Canterbury which is £5.60 SDR, so not that different really. Also remember wages are higher in the south east in line with everything else.
     
  21. Nym

    Nym Established Member

    Messages:
    8,124
    Joined:
    2 Mar 2007
    Location:
    Somewhere, not in London
    The're ment to be, but I coudn't fit on the 0856 this morning, and the 0912 was delayed as usual so I jumped ship onto an empty victoria service.

    It's usually the case that even the off peak services would need to be 3 or 4 car for every passenger to be able to be comfortable.
     
  22. HH

    HH Established Member

    Messages:
    4,060
    Joined:
    31 Jul 2009
    Location:
    Essex
    Fact is southern railways make money. Rest of country generally loses money. Whether the fares are cheaper, or they carry more fresh air, or the journeys are longer - or all 3 most likely - isn't important. I'm sure it's the same reason why money in the north is concentrated on Madchester. More passengers means more investment.
     
  23. LNW-GW Joint

    LNW-GW Joint Veteran Member

    Messages:
    13,538
    Joined:
    22 Feb 2011
    Location:
    Mold, Clwyd
    Plenty spent recently on station upgrades at Chester, Crewe and Warrington (both BQ and Central).

    On fares it's the PTEs who have very low fares.
    "Regional" fares are pretty much on a par with anywhere else.
     
  24. RAPC

    RAPC Member

    Messages:
    195
    Joined:
    30 May 2010
    As a commuter on those services, I can confirm they are definitely not. If it isn't a 180 rostered service, or if a 180 isn't available, then it is normally a single 150 or 156 if we're lucky.
     
  25. davo882000

    davo882000 Member

    Messages:
    32
    Joined:
    12 Sep 2011
    Anyone writing to their MP? If so could i have a copy and i will send it to my MP too!!
     
  26. sittingnev

    sittingnev Member

    Messages:
    6
    Joined:
    13 Apr 2011
    Hi guys
    like i said in my orig post, i dont usually post, just tend to lurk, so no big deal really.
    Its not often I am first with anything, and actually have the time @ work to post let alone reply. (and even less often have the knowlege to)
    I wouldnt be to offended if this one gets closed in favour of the other one.
    Cheers
     
  27. aformeruser

    aformeruser Veteran Member

    Messages:
    30,637
    Joined:
    23 Jan 2009
    One reason for that is because electric trains that are used on most South East services are more cost effective than diesel trains that are used on most North of England services. If the South East were using 150s for a lot of their services the amount of money they make would drop significantly.
     
  28. 87015

    87015 Established Member

    Messages:
    4,324
    Joined:
    3 Mar 2006
    Location:
    GEML/WCML/SR
    That sounds like a claim, what about Chiltern and Thames operations? Leasing, maintenance and track access charges for 12-EMU vice 4-DMU are far higher, and it can be cheaper to use a diesel than pay NR's electricity charge (see also freight).
     
  29. aformeruser

    aformeruser Veteran Member

    Messages:
    30,637
    Joined:
    23 Jan 2009
    Do you know the meaning of the word 'most'. I didn't claim there were no diesel services in the South East nor did I claim there were no electric services in the north.

    What's the cost comparison like for a 6 car 185 over an 8 car EMU?
     
  30. cle

    cle Established Member

    Messages:
    1,884
    Joined:
    17 Nov 2010
    Hopefully patronage will shoot up when 319s or similar are used on services from Manchester to Liverpool, and both to Blackpool.

    And the economics should add up, especially with much quicker and more frequent services. And then the investment should follow.

    Unfortunately, the government don't like taking risks and so are much more keen on investing in growing established big markets than developing new ones.

    Finally - Cheshire no investment? How about the hourly Virgin trains to Chester? A huge boost to the local economy. If east of there, choose from any of Warrington, Stockport, Wilmslow, Macclesfield for fast and frequent trains to London, Manchester and Birmingham.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page