penaltyfines
Member
- Joined
- 4 Sep 2010
- Messages
- 298
But we aren't allowed to know what station it is! It's hard to judge.
Southall
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
Oh I am sorry if I have not made myself clear.
You hadn't.
A passenger completing a journey at a station is expected to either (a) pass through a ticket operated barrier, pass through a barrier line (something different) - which may or may not be unmanned, or pass through a station which does not have a barrier at all.
The latter was applicable, no barrier, no ticket checks in the station.
So if they followed me to the supermarket, it's still reasonable to ask?Now it would seem reasonable that a passenger in possession of a ticket,which has not been collected, would have that ticket on their person and thus would be able to produce it immediately on request.
The overriding point of this thread is *when* are you no longer required to retain your ticket?
Until a person completes their journey, they can expect that at some time they may be asked to produce the ticket for inspection so as to be able to demonstrate that they actually HAVE paid.
I most certainly have completed my journey when I have left the station. I have also finished my journey when I step from the train, as I am no longer travelling!
If you are required to produce a ticket anywhere within the station, why were CTA invented?
This is no different to being in a shop with an item which was purchased before a customer leaves a store.
Actually, the old saying of posession being 9/10ths of the law... a shop has no requirement to even issue a receipt, much less for me to retain one. I can walk out of the shop with my shopping and refuse to produce a receipt if requested. If they want to detain me for shoplifting, and end up being charged for wrongful imprisonment, on their head be it. Again comparing a train to a shop makes rail travel look a bit antequated, bit I digress...
Clarity? Practice? I see 3 different times, how clear!For the sake of clarity, the journey is completed when the passenger leaves Railway premises. In practice we accept that the journey ends when the passenger passes through a ticket barrier, past the defined barrier line, or in some cases leaves the platform.
I don't think you'll find much consensus on that, Southern TET (or whatever they're called) anyone?RPIs are generally pragmatic people who do not enter the job as a means of antagonising the travelling public, and will use their judgement.
Stopping people immediately outside of the station simply demonstrates without any discord, intent to avoid payment UNLESS a passenger specifically approaches the RPI for the purpose of paying the fare.
Past the ticket office, maybe. Off the premises, no.
That said Railway Byelaws make it an offence to be on a train without a ticket in specific situations. Situations which are not clearly defined will then fall under the 1889 Act once the passenger has attempted to leave the station.
Quite agree. Citizens arrest away, at their peril of it being false imprisonment/wrongful arrest.
Again, bad example. What alarm have I set off? And again there's no need to issue, or retain, a receipt.I see being asked to produce evidence of having purchased a ticket on departing the station no differently to being asked to produce a sales receipt in the event of an item in your bag setting off a store alarm. Do people start arguing with the security guard ? No, not in my experience unless they are trying to thieve.
On the train. Perhaps in the station, if within a CTA. How is this even relevant?The Regulation of Railways Act 1889 is quite clear in that it is the responsibility of the passenger to produce a valid ticket when asked to do so.
You are showing your age. How does a uniform confer respect so any other human being. Equally, what gives them the right to interfere with my business outside of the premises?I really do not see what the issue is here, other than this modern attitude towards questioning even the most reasonable of request when made by staff in uniform.
See above. Finished journey. No need to produce a ticket after journey has finished, much less of the premises.The 1889 Act makes quite clear the consequences of not being able to produce a ticket.
I believe that the Conditions of Carriage direct passengers to retain their tickets until they have completed their journey. This is so as to get around this issue.
An RPI will NOT be asking someone to produce a ticket somewhere down the High St. They will be operating from Railway premises in practically every case, and when stood outside of the station will again almost always be on Railway Property. Even if they are not they are still entitled under the 1889 Act to request a ticket.
HOW is this applicable? If you're off the premises, you have NO need to retain or produce a ticket. Sure they can arrest under 1889 act, but what proof do they have? They're setting themselves up to be arrested themselves. I can say 'no comment', and what do they have?
If you feel that there are many "heavy handed RPI types" then maybe a clue as to why can be read in the second sentence of the OPs first post. Had the OP done so in my time (when I would have had BTP around almost certainly) then they would have been having a word at the very least, as I would never tolerate under any circumstances my staff being abused by passengers in such a manner. Make of that how you wish, but I finally gave up frontline duties because of the hostile attitudes of passengers, which made the job so much harder. I admire those who can deal with such morons day in, day out, as I found myself becoming less and less tolerant with them as time went on.
I'm glad 'your time' is coming to and end as time goes on
If you feel that there are many "heavy handed passenger types" then maybe a clue as to why can be read in the second sentence of the OPs first post. Had the RPI done so in my time I would never tolerate under any circumstances passengers being irritated by RPIs abusing their powers in such a manner. Make of that how you wish, but I finally gave up travelling by train because of the hostile attitudes of RPIs, which made putting up with rail travel so much harder. I admire those who can deal with such morons day in, day out, as I found myself becoming less and less tolerant with them as time went on.
Perhaps a new thread is needed.
Last edited: