I have two separate advance tickets (one to and one from Derby). If the incoming train were to be delayed such that I missed my connection, would I be forced to buy another ticket for my connection?
You should technically have to buy a new ticket as when splitting tickets you have no protection if you miss a connection, however long it is but as others have said if you ask the Train Manager they may say yes.
No this isn't true. The circumstances where you would have to buy another ticket would be if you didn't leave the minimum required connection time at the station, if you were transferring onto the rail service from a non National Rail transport mode which caused your delay (e.g. a Tram network).
But the National Rail Conditions of Carriage do allow combinations of tickets to be valid.
National Rail Conditions of Carriage (NRCoC), Condition 19,.......
And the only place in the NRCoC that talks about missing connections is here:
43. Help from Train Companies if you are stranded .......
And thus shows no exclusions from Advance tickets (which are valid as combinations) and nowhere in the training of my job or through the course of carrying out my job have I come across this rule that Advance purchase tickets are exempt from being allowed on the following train if another TOC has caused you a delay that in turn misses your connection.
You post was really too long to just cut and paste, so I have removed the passages contained in the NCoC and have provided this link to reference them.
I think this has been discussed before. The NCoC can be dubious at times, but I think you need to take note of the introduction (third paragraph), Condition 7 and Conditions 44 and 45.
The situation would stand that the train company involved in your first ticket could, quite rightly, say they got you to your contractual destination (as printed on your ticket). The train company involved in your second ticket could, quite rightly, say they had provided your contracted service and you failed to board it before it left. Just because the NCoC says you can use two tickets to complete a journey doesn't mean they have the same conditions that a through ticket would have. Now I would think that most staff would just try and arrange a service for you to use, but, from my reading of the NCoC, you have no legal right to it.
Condition 44 and 45 really have nothing whatsoever to do with the case in hand....
This would never stand up in court, and remember that if there is any doubt the customer is deemed to be right in consumer law....The situation would stand that the train company involved in your first ticket could, quite rightly, say they got you to your contractual destination (as printed on your ticket). The train company involved in your second ticket could, quite rightly, say they had provided your contracted service and you failed to board it before it left. Just because the NCoC says you can use two tickets to complete a journey doesn't mean they have the same conditions that a through ticket would have....
This would never stand up in court, and remember that if there is any doubt the customer is deemed to be right in consumer law.
A journey is a journey - singular. In a journey there is one destination. Anywhere else is a stop over point.
Destination is "The place set for the end of a journey, or to which something is sent; place or point aimed at." (Source: dictionary.co.uk)
The NCoC explicity states that a combination of tickets can be counted as one journey.
I rest my case!!