47827
Member
Seems tight on timings unless thats F1 pit stop style servicing.
Ample time to refuel which would be one of the important things.
Seems tight on timings unless thats F1 pit stop style servicing.
All ECS movements at Scarborough are timed. So unless there is an ECS to and from the depot...So stabling in Scarborough still? Would that be station of the depot?
Maybe so due to the nature of the network currently, although if those services stick it will be logical to run sets to the depot for fuel in the daytime if the diagrams give them time to do that.All ECS movements at Scarborough are timed. So unless there is an ECS to and from the depot...
I suspect the plans currently showing in RTT are basically a work of fiction. There will likely be rather fewer sets out - at least at the commencement of the timetable.
If the sets are doing all day diagrams with runs to and from Liverpool etc., then yes they'll have to be fuelled at Scarborough. Doing so during the daytime avoids the noise complaints but obviously takes a set out of action for about an hour at a time.Maybe so due to the nature of the network currently, although if those services stick it will be logical to run sets to the depot for fuel in the daytime if the diagrams give them time to do that.
If the sets are doing all day diagrams with runs to and from Liverpool etc., then yes they'll have to be fuelled at Scarborough. Doing so during the daytime avoids the noise complaints but obviously takes a set out of action for about an hour at a time.
If they're mainly doing York shuttles as now, they can get away without fuelling, because the turnarounds are so long that effectively the set is only working for 6-7 hours a day vs. perhaps twice that on Liverpool workings.
These have started with little, that I've noticed, fanfare. I tried doing the evening service on Day one (yesterday) but was severely defeated by a broken down freight train (that killed the service between Middlesbrough and Saltburn full stop from around 1900 to the end of the day). However today it came off smoothly!
View attachment 114828
View attachment 114829
View attachment 114830
View attachment 114831
My passenger count had three from Redcar to Saltburn and two on from Saltburn (including me!). Jolly good fun to have a 185 down here though and go non-stop to/from Redcar. Arrived around 5 early at Redcar, clearly time for a stop at Marske both ways!
Hopefully when the full timetable starts it'll get more use though rather just being an operational convenience.
Very unlikely. TPE only serve Thornaby, Middlesbrough, Redcar Central and Saltburn. That would still cut Dinsdale, Allens West, Eaglescliffe, Redcar East, Longbeck and Marske. Its a non-starter from a service point of view and that's quite apart from us being the darling of the Tory Party with our shiny mayor and new Tory MPs.Although I fear when TPE does start up with the full timetable, it will give Northern the excuse to permanently cut back their service to 1tph for the entire line.
Not meaning to sound dense, but where would this be located? Would they need to erect a new structure/cabin?It will be non-stop.
Saltburn will see the addition of a messroom, but no additional passenger facing facilities AFAIK.
Various parts of old station with unoccupied rooms.Not meaning to sound dense, but where would this be located? Would they need to erect a new structure/cabin?
Interesting! Seems a bit of shame for them not to use part of the station building. Must surely be enough space as I don't think it's all used? Though I haven't paid close attention to what businesses are set up within.There is a new portacabin at the west end of the station. This will have toilet and cooking facilities.
I wouldn't want to pay the rents for any if the units in the old station building. In dire need of repair and astronomical.One thing that intrigues me now that the service has appeared in RTT is that there is going to be one hour in the day where, for a few minutes at least, there will be two TPEs in the station at the same time. Typically from mid-morning onwards the TPEs arrive at xx58 and the depart at xx51. But then in the evening we have a 1906 arrival which doesn't depart until 2008 meaning that it will be there at the same time as the 2004 arrival. I'm mildly curious as to why the 1906 arrival doesn't depart at 1951 like you'd expect it to.
Interesting! Seems a bit of shame for them not to use part of the station building. Must surely be enough space as I don't think it's all used? Though I haven't paid close attention to what businesses are set up within.
There's the Miniature Railway (usually runs at weekends but check their website / facebook page for running days) in the Valley Gardens and the funicular railway down to the pier that are worth a go.I definitely need to give Saltburn a try one day. Now there's a direct train it would be rude not to.
Ah shame! It would be nice to get the building more in use but if the landlord isn't be sensible/pragmaticI wouldn't want to pay the rents for any if the units in the old station building. In dire need of repair and astronomical.
Oh interesting! I was wondering what they were doing down there last year (or maybe earlier this year, can't recall now!) when they were digging that area up and fiddling around. Presumably it was laying foundations for the portacabin that has appeared since!I can only see a green tin cabin not accessed from the platform as shown in the first picture.
I spotted some new screens at Redcar East this morning so I wonder if Northern are having a little upgrade of screens along the line? Certainly though Saltburn's one summary screen hasn't been sufficient since day one. It doesn't even tell you calling patterns which I suppose you could just about get away with when the only trains were, with a few exceptions, to Bishop or Darlington but certainly isn't fit for purpose now there will be trains to Manchester (still feels like a strange thing to say about Saltburn!).Also seems that there's going to be new departure screens- the one already installed is inadequate!
As with many of these things on the railway, it's driven more by operational convenience than anything else. Saltburn doesn't really receive a half hourly service to Darlington because there are millions of people wanting to make that journey, but rather because that service serves many intermediate flows and there isn't really anywhere convenient to terminate alternate services, with a decent turnround, between Middlesbrough and Saltburn.There's little old Saltburn getting 3 trains an hour connecting it with the ECML, and then there's Scarborough, about 10 times as big, getting one. Somethin' wrong surely.
(Yes I know there's another hourly train to Scarborough that wanders along the east coast, but that doesn't count.)
and how many of the Scarborough-York trains actually operate seeing as though it’s a TransPennine Express service…?There's little old Saltburn getting 3 trains an hour connecting it with the ECML, and then there's Scarborough, about 10 times as big, getting one. Somethin' wrong surely.
(Yes I know there's another hourly train to Scarborough that wanders along the east coast, but that doesn't count.)
Thanks to the majority of services being Scarborough <> York shuttles we've been doing rather well for quite a while now. When TransPantomime start running to and from Scarborough over the Pennines again I'm sure things will get back to 'normal'.and how many of the Scarborough-York trains actually operate seeing as though it’s a TransPennine Express service…?
That deserves a mention in the unofficial nicknames thread... a bit more imaginative than the usual First/Worst, Great/Late, and Rail/Fail ones!Thanks to the majority of services being Scarborough <> York shuttles we've been doing rather well for quite a while now. When TransPantomime start running to and from Scarborough over the Pennines again I'm sure things will get back to 'normal'.
Well I hope the half-hourly service happens because I would probably use the line more. What I find strange is that a place with the prestige of Scarborough doesn't kick up more of a fuss about the poor train service they receive. This especially so because the main road, the A64, tends to be beset with traffic hold ups.As with many of these things on the railway, it's driven more by operational convenience than anything else. Saltburn doesn't really receive a half hourly service to Darlington because there are millions of people wanting to make that journey, but rather because that service serves many intermediate flows and there isn't really anywhere convenient to terminate alternate services, with a decent turnround, between Middlesbrough and Saltburn.
I think there is every prospect of Scarborough getting a more frequent service to York in the future. From December, the headcodes of services go up in 4s (e.g. 1U24, 1U28, 1U32 to York), leaving a gap (1U26/30). That does suggest some level of intention to introduce services to fill (a few?) of these gaps.
I think that it does. There are occasionally political demands for some through London services, though the option in the tender for these was ultimately rejected in favour of the Harrogate and Middlesbrough services by the Virgin Trains East Coast bid team. There was also a successful campaign to increase the Sunday service to York to hourly, and Monday - Saturday to make hourly through services to Leeds a requirement and to increase the service to Hull to hourly.Well I hope the half-hourly service happens because I would probably use the line more. What I find strange is that a place with the prestige of Scarborough doesn't kick up more of a fuss about the poor train service they receive. This especially so because the main road, the A64, tends to be beset with traffic hold ups.
To be fair, its not all about getting connections with the ECML - although that is useful!There's little old Saltburn getting 3 trains an hour connecting it with the ECML, and then there's Scarborough, about 10 times as big, getting one. Somethin' wrong surely.
(Yes I know there's another hourly train to Scarborough that wanders along the east coast, but that doesn't count.)
But traveling from York, and other places, you have the choice of direct and via Darlington and now that the dread pacers have gone, the Darlington journey isn't all that bad.To be fair, its not all about getting connections with the ECML - although that is useful!
It's more about having direct links with regional centres such as York, Leeds and Manchester - which Scarborough already has!
Yes, before people say, this extension isn't just about providing links to Redcar and East Cleveland, it's about operational benefits, it will help the area *.
*providing the proposed timetable is implemented in full!
Maybe it could be considered by Hull trains to put on a SCA-HUL-KGX service.Scarborough - York was identified as having sufficient demand to support 2tph which had previously been due to start in 2019.
Obviously the delivery of that was long delayed and now the pandemic and the new agenda changes things. But as above providing the funding were in place it would be fairly straightforward to run 2tph for some or all of the day.
Scarborough - York was upgraded to hourly on Sundays less than a decade ago too. Shame the current provision on Sundays is little more than a shrug of the shoulders, as with many TransPennine Express routes.
Unfortunately the journey times would simply be far too slow, although Hull Trains probably could have served Driffield or Bridlington competitively enough if they had the resources.Maybe it could be considered by Hull trains to put on a SCA-HUL-LKX service.