Trains to Derby etc are now well outside the original station area.Please explain your reasoning. I would not say that St. Pancras has moved.
Trains to Derby etc are now well outside the original station area.Please explain your reasoning. I would not say that St. Pancras has moved.
I agree but would class that are as a extension to the station. Not a station that has been moved.Trains to Derby etc are now well outside the original station area.
That's why I specifically stated "the London terminus of the former Midland Railway"I agree but would class that are as a extension to the station. Not a station that has been moved.
That's why I specifically stated "the London terminus of the former Midland Railway"
Docklands Light Railway- Island Gardens, Mudchute,
Gateshead - now a sub-surface Metro station.These two were vertical as well (??) as horizontal. Were the others? Any more vertical moves? City Thameslink I suppose.
Liverpool Moorfields/Exchange, and St. Pancras suburban/Thameslink spring to mind...These two were vertical as well (??) as horizontal. Were the others? Any more vertical moves? City Thameslink I suppose.
Manors would probably be in scope for this thread twice, because the completely closed Manors North side on the old loop line replaced the original Blyth and Tyne terminus a bit further north on New Bridge St, and the Manors East platforms on the mainline side (of which only the single island remains), replaced the original terminus of the Newcastle and North Shields line, which was a bit further west on a straighter alignment than the present route towards Central Station.Do non-geographical "moves" count? Manors has moved in status from being a major and bustling junction to being a rather run-down inner-city hovel with a skeleton service!
Hounslow WestThese two were vertical as well (??) as horizontal. Were the others? Any more vertical moves? City Thameslink I suppose.
Hounslow West
Highgate
And on BR, Retford on the east-west lines, was at ECML level, put into underpass.
I wouldn't call City Thameslink a move because there wasn't a previous one. It's a new station.
City Thameslink replaced Holborn Viaduct which was on a higher level above the station occupying the sites of that station and Ludgate Hill (closed 1929). The original entrance to Holborn Viaduct station forms one of the entrances to City Thameslink station.
Just looking at my documentation, there are over 350 present day operational National Rail Stations that have been moved/rebuilt from their original site.
Surely, this and this huge long list - I mean, it feels as if more stations have been moved than remain on their original sites - surely this only goes to prove that the railway pioneers should have waited, say, 20 - 25 years before building the stations, then they'd have been more likely to get it right in the first place, and save the relocation?
It's common sense, surely?
I was once told that when Lancaster University was built on a green and brownfield site in the 1960s the builders built all the fixed things, like buildings and roads, but deliberately waited a while until people had trodden footpaths, then that's where they tarmacked them.
It could be an urban myth.